Advanced Search Results

Present: M/S Sukhdeep Singh Sandhu and Y.K.Saxena Advocates for the Vs ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Land Acquisition

with Section 120 B IPC; under Section 25 of the Arms Act and under Section 4 of the Anti Hijacking Act, 1982 and sentenced to undergo for varying terms as mentioned in the order of sentence.2. CR.A.No.292-DB of 2009 is … admissible as evidence; a civil Court is bound to find the facts for itself. ……”.62. In terms of Section 8 of the Evidence Act, any fact is relevant which shows or constitutes a motive or preparation for any

Amrinder Singh Vs. Unon of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992(3)WLC307; 1992WLN(UC)389

Singh S/o Tara Singh, who is being tried for the offence under sections 4 and 5 of the Anti Hijacking Act, 1982 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act') in case No. ASC/Ajmer/1 /1985 pending before the Addl. Special … petition has been filed by Amrinder Singh S/o Tara Singh, who is being tried for the offence under sections 4 and 5 of the Anti Hijacking Act, 1982 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act') in

Kartar Singh Vs. State of Punjab.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 1994SCC(3)569; JT1994(2)423

Sections 121, 121-A, 122 and 123 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 5 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 and deleted the rest from the original schedule.7. It has been brought to our notice by Mr K.T.S. … a question as to whether mens rea or actual knowledge is an essential ingredient of the offence under Section 8(1) read with Section 23(1)(a) of the Foreign Exchange Regulation Act, 1947, when it was shown that the respondent

Pragyasingh Chandrapalsingh Thakur and Another Vs. State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

having national/ international implications, which have an effect on the sovereignty, integrity and security of India. (iii) The Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 gives effect to Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft and for matters connected therewith, signed … be called the Delhi Special Police Establishment for the investigation in any Union Territory of offences notified under Section 8. Moreover, by virtue of Section 6 of the DSPE Act, the Delhi Special Police Establishment cannot exercise powers

Vignesh Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu.

Court : Chennai

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 341, 395, 386, 167(2), 467; TNPPDL Act - Section 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(2), 439, 173; Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 5 and 9; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19; Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 - Section 4

of not less than fifteen years and which may extend to thirty years. Section 4 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 provides a minimum term of imprisonment for life. The important fact to notice is that in 1978 when

Om Prakash Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 121A, 122, 128, 130, 131, 132, 194, 238, 255, 304, 313, 314, 326, 329, 364, 371, 372, 376, 376(2), 377, 386, 394, 395, 400, 409, 412, 413, 436, 438, 449, 459, 460, 467, 489A, 489B, 489D and 506; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment), 1973 - Sections 167; Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19; ;Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 - Sections 4

Reported in : 121(2005)DLT686

of not less than fifteen years and which may extend to thirty years. Section 4 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 provides a minimum term of imprisonment for life. The important fact to notice is that in 1978 when … on two decisions:(1) Rajeev Chaudhary v. State (N.C.T.) of Delhi: : 2001CriLJ2941 (2) Rajeev Chaudhary v. State: : 86(2000)DLT203 2.2.3 I shall examine each of these decisions. But, before I do so it would be appropriate to

Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 1962 (33 of 1962); 2. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (37 of 1967); 3. The Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 (65 of 1982); 4. The Suppression of Unlawful Acts against Safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982 (66 of … Yafai was in contact through the internet with members of the Islamic 8 9 10 State /Islamic State of Iraq and Syria /Islamic State of … Criminal Appeal No 1166 of 2021 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are: A Facts B Submissions C Provisions of the NIA Act D Continuation of

Deepa Singh vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1989 (Act 33 of 1989), section 5-B of the Suppression of Unlawful Act against safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982 (Act 66 of 1982), section 6-A of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 (Act 65 of 1982), sub-section(2) of section … that this Court had given directions in Rambeer Shokeen v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2017 SCC OnLine Del 8504, that in the event of the presiding officer of Special Court being not available either on account of

Anuradha @ Chiku vs State(Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

1989 (Act 33 of 1989), section 5-B of the Suppression of Unlawful Act against safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982 (Act 66 of 1982), section 6-A of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 (Act 65 of 1982), sub-section(2) of section … that this Court had given directions in Rambeer Shokeen v. State (NCT of Delhi), 2017 SCC OnLine Del 8504, that in the event of the presiding officer of Special Court being not available either on account of

Rajeev Chaudhary Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167(2)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2023; 86(2000)DLT203; 2000(54)DRJ722

of not less than fifteen years and which may extend to thirty years. Section 4 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 provides a minimum term of imprisonment for life. The important fact to notice is that in 1978 when