Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: anti hijacking act 1982 section 5 · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.028 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 14 1992

Amrinder Singh Vs. Unon of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-14-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992(3)WLC307; 1992WLN(UC)389

Singh S/o Tara Singh, who is being tried for the offence under sections 4 and 5 of the Anti Hijacking Act, 1982 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act') in case No. ASC/Ajmer/1 /1985 pending before the Addl. Special … commits the offence of hijacking shall be punished with imprisonment for life and shall also be liable to fine.Section-5 Punishment for acts of violence connected with hijacking- Whoever, being a person committing the offence of hijacking of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 30 2012

Vignesh Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 341, 395, 386, 167(2), 467; TNPPDL Act - Section 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(2), 439, 173; Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 5 and 9; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19; Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 - Section 4

of not less than fifteen years and which may extend to thirty years. Section 4 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 provides a minimum term of imprisonment for life. The important fact to notice is that in 1978 when … person convicted under Section 302 IPC and sentenced to life imprisonment is not entitled to the benefit of Section 5 of the said Act as the offence of murder is punishable with death. (See Sube Singh v. State

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2013

Pragyasingh Chandrapalsingh Thakur and Another Vs. State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-11-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

having national/ international implications, which have an effect on the sovereignty, integrity and security of India. (iii) The Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 gives effect to Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft and for matters connected therewith, signed … place of the same and which enactment can be other than the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. 51 Section 5 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 enacts the saving clause and states that nothing in the Code

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 25 2014

Present: M/S Sukhdeep Singh Sandhu and Y.K.Saxena Advocates for the Vs ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-25-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

with Section 120 B IPC; under Section 25 of the Arms Act and under Section 4 of the Anti Hijacking Act, 1982 and sentenced to undergo for varying terms as mentioned in the order of sentence.2. CR.A.No.292-DB of 2009 is … with Sections 408 & 477A IPC. The prosecution adduced its evidence that the offence disclosed is punishable under Section 5 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1947. Thus an argument was raised that the Indian Penal Code stands

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1984

State of Punjab Vs. Piara Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-21-1984

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1985CriLJ146

Act, 1885, The Indian Railways Act, 1890, the Explosives Substances Act, 1908, the Arms Act, 1959, The Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982. The Suppression of Unlawful Acts against Safety of Civil Aviation, and The Prevention of Damage to Public Property … number of bail applications. The question being of jurisdiction, affecting the power of the Court of Sessions Under Sections 438, 439 and 439A (as applicable to the State of Punjab and extended to the Union Territory, Chandigarh) … Punjab prayed for revision of that order. And in Criminal Misc. No. 5033-M of 1984, the complainant has prayed for cancellation of bail of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1994

Kartar Singh Vs. State of Punjab.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-11-1994

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 1994SCC(3)569; JT1994(2)423

Sections 121, 121-A, 122 and 123 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 5 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 and deleted the rest from the original schedule.7. It has been brought to our notice by Mr K.T.S. … a judgment of Bombay High Court in State v. Abdul Aziz49 wherein a Division Bench while dealing with Section 5 of the Imports and Exports (Control) Act, 1947 under which the respondent (accused) was prosecuted has held thus

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2005

Om Prakash Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-22-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 121A, 122, 128, 130, 131, 132, 194, 238, 255, 304, 313, 314, 326, 329, 364, 371, 372, 376, 376(2), 377, 386, 394, 395, 400, 409, 412, 413, 436, 438, 449, 459, 460, 467, 489A, 489B, 489D and 506; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment), 1973 - Sections 167; Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19; ;Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 - Sections 4

Reported in : 121(2005)DLT686

of not less than fifteen years and which may extend to thirty years. Section 4 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 provides a minimum term of imprisonment for life. The important fact to notice is that in 1978 when … on bail. But, how long does this right ensure to the benefit of the accused? In Sanjay Dutt v. State through CBI, Bombay (II): : 1995CriLJ477 , the Supreme Court held that (page 442): 'The indefeasible right

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2021

Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 1962 (33 of 1962); 2. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (37 of 1967); 3. The Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 (65 of 1982); 4. The Suppression of Unlawful Acts against Safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982 (66 of … Facts 1 This batch of two appeals arises from a judgment dated 5 July 2018 of a Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature … Criminal Appeal No 1166 of 2021 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are: A Facts B Submissions C Provisions of the NIA Act D Continuation of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2017

Rambeer Shokeen vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-22-2017

Subject : MRTP

1989 (Act 33 of 1989), section 5-B of the Suppression of Unlawful Act against safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982 (Act 66 of 1982), section 6-A of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 (Act 65 of 1982), sub-section(2) of section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 17 2026

Deepa Singh vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Feb-17-2026

Subject : Land Acquisition

1989 (Act 33 of 1989), section 5-B of the Suppression of Unlawful Act against safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982 (Act 66 of 1982), section 6-A of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 (Act 65 of 1982), sub-section(2) of section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial