Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: anti hijacking act 1982 section 2 · Page 1 of about 18 results (0.035 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 30 2012

Vignesh Vs. the State of Tamil Nadu.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Mar-30-2012

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 341, 395, 386, 167(2), 467; TNPPDL Act - Section 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 167(2), 439, 173; Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 5 and 9; Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19; Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 - Section 4

of not less than fifteen years and which may extend to thirty years. Section 4 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 provides a minimum term of imprisonment for life. The important fact to notice is that in 1978 when … 'imprisonment for a term of not less than ten years' used in Clause (i) of Proviso (a) to Sub-section (2) of Section 167 includes imprisonment for a term of ten years as well as imprisonment f or-a term

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 14 1992

Amrinder Singh Vs. Unon of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-14-1992

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1992(3)WLC307; 1992WLN(UC)389

Singh S/o Tara Singh, who is being tried for the offence under sections 4 and 5 of the Anti Hijacking Act, 1982 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act') in case No. ASC/Ajmer/1 /1985 pending before the Addl. Special … petition has been filed by Amrinder Singh S/o Tara Singh, who is being tried for the offence under sections 4 and 5 of the Anti Hijacking Act, 1982 (hereinafter to be referred to as the Act') in … petitioner urged that the aforesaid provision contained in Section 4 infringed Sections 235(2) and 354(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure.5. Section 235(2) of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 22 2005

Om Prakash Vs. State (Nct of Delhi)

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jun-22-2005

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 121A, 122, 128, 130, 131, 132, 194, 238, 255, 304, 313, 314, 326, 329, 364, 371, 372, 376, 376(2), 377, 386, 394, 395, 400, 409, 412, 413, 436, 438, 449, 459, 460, 467, 489A, 489B, 489D and 506; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167(2); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) (Amendment), 1973 - Sections 167; Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (in Financial Establishments) Act, 1999; ;Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 - Sections 15, 16, 17, 18 and 19; ;Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 - Sections 4

Reported in : 121(2005)DLT686

of not less than fifteen years and which may extend to thirty years. Section 4 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 provides a minimum term of imprisonment for life. The important fact to notice is that in 1978 when … to the accused on the failure of the prosecution to file the challan within the period specified under sub-section (2) of Section 167 and right can be availed of by the accused if he is prepared to offer

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Feb 25 2014

Present: M/S Sukhdeep Singh Sandhu and Y.K.Saxena Advocates for the Vs ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Feb-25-2014

Subject : Land Acquisition

with Section 120 B IPC; under Section 25 of the Arms Act and under Section 4 of the Anti Hijacking Act, 1982 and sentenced to undergo for varying terms as mentioned in the order of sentence.2. CR.A.No.292-DB of 2009 is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 21 1984

State of Punjab Vs. Piara Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Decided on : Sep-21-1984

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1985CriLJ146

Act, 1885, The Indian Railways Act, 1890, the Explosives Substances Act, 1908, the Arms Act, 1959, The Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982. The Suppression of Unlawful Acts against Safety of Civil Aviation, and The Prevention of Damage to Public Property … Singh and Toti accused did not fall within (he definition of 'terrorist' as defined in Clause (h) of Section 2 of the Ordinance and accordingly they were ordered to be released on bail. Thus the conglomerated view of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2000

Rajeev Chaudhary Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-26-2000

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 167(2)

Reported in : 2001CriLJ2023; 86(2000)DLT203; 2000(54)DRJ722

of not less than fifteen years and which may extend to thirty years. Section 4 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 provides a minimum term of imprisonment for life. The important fact to notice is that in 1978 when … to judicial custody on 1st November, 1998. Later, he was released on bail pursuant to an order dated 2nd January, 1999 passed by the learned Metropolitan Magistrate, New Delhi. The said order dated 2nd January, 1999 was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1994

Kartar Singh Vs. State of Punjab.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-11-1994

Subject : Land Acquisition

Reported in : 1994SCC(3)569; JT1994(2)423

Sections 121, 121-A, 122 and 123 of the Indian Penal Code and Sections 4 and 5 of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 and deleted the rest from the original schedule.7. It has been brought to our notice by Mr K.T.S. … to provide for the speedy trial of certain offenses in terrorist affected areas and for matters connected therewith. Section 2(1) of this Act defines the expression "terrorist affected area" as an area declared as a "terrorist affected area"

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 2013

Pragyasingh Chandrapalsingh Thakur and Another Vs. State of Maharashtr ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-11-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

having national/ international implications, which have an effect on the sovereignty, integrity and security of India. (iii) The Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 gives effect to Convention for the Suppression of Unlawful Seizure of Aircraft and for matters connected therewith, signed … of the CBI do not encroach upon the functions of police forces created by the State Governments. Thus, Section 2(1) of the DSPE Act expressly provides that notwithstanding anything in the Police Act, 1861, the Central Government may

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 20 2021

Naser Bin Abu Bakr Yafai Vs. The State Of Maharashtra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-20-2021

Subject : Land Acquisition

Act, 1962 (33 of 1962); 2. The Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 (37 of 1967); 3. The Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 (65 of 1982); 4. The Suppression of Unlawful Acts against Safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982 (66 of … Criminal Appeal No 1166 of 2021 JUDGMENT Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, J This judgment has been divided into sections to facilitate analysis. They are: A Facts B Submissions C Provisions of the NIA Act D Continuation of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 22 2017

Rambeer Shokeen vs.state of Nct of Delhi

Court : Delhi

Decided on : May-22-2017

Subject : MRTP

1989 (Act 33 of 1989), section 5-B of the Suppression of Unlawful Act against safety of Civil Aviation Act, 1982 (Act 66 of 1982), section 6-A of the Anti-Hijacking Act, 1982 (Act 65 of 1982), sub-section(2) of section

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial