Advanced Search Results

State of Maharashtra Vs. Kusum Charudutt Bharma Upadhye

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Civil

Reported in : (1981)83BOMLR75; 1981MhLJ93

This is in fact what Parliament did for the erstwhile State of Andhra by Section 28 of the Andhra State Act, 1953 (XXX of 1953), which Act formed a new Part A State to be known as the State of … Entry 79 was substituted by the above entry by the Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956. The original Entry 67 was, as follows:67. Extension of the jurisdiction of a High Court having its principal seat in any State

M.P.V. Sundararamier and Co. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Sales TaxConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 246, 286, 286(1), 286(2), 301 and 372; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 2 and 22; Sales Tax Laws Validation Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Impugned Act

Reported in : AIR1958SC468; (1958)IMLJ179(SC); [1958]1SCR1422; [1958]9STC298(SC)

Madras to enact a law to operate in another State. But it isargued that s. 53 of the Andhra State Act, 1953, on its true interpretationenacts that though for political purposes Andhra is to be regarded as aseparate State, for … those laws is Madras General Sales Tax Act (Madras 9 of 1939),hereinafter referred to as the Madras Act. Section 54 of the Andhra State Actconferred on the Government a power to adapt laws for the purpose of … of this Court in Poppatlal Shah v. The State of Madras [1953]S.C.R. 677, wherein it was held that under the definition of 'sale'in s. 2(h)

Osmania University Teachers Association (Outa) Represented by Its Gene ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : University Grants Commission Act, 1956; University Grants Commission Regulations, 2000 - Sections 14 and 26; Andhra Pradesh Universities Act, 1991 - Sections 43A; Andhra Pradesh Universities (Amendment) Act, 2001

Reported in : 2002(4)ALT682

Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh

Ramesh Chandra Shrivas Vs. Shri Murti Ramchandraji

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Madhya Pradesh Accommodation Control Act, 1961 - Sections 3

Reported in : 2004(1)MPHT225

prospective in operation in the case of Sri Vijayalakshmi Rice Mills, New Contractors Co. etc. v. State of Andhra Pradesh (1), it was emphasised that:--'...... It is well recognized rule of interpretation that in the absence of … notification of April 24, 1951 inserted the following notification dated January 12, 1953 :--'Revenue Department, Bombay Castle, 12 January, 1953, Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands … second appeal is:--'Whether the notification dated 7-9-89 under Sub-section (2) of Section 3 of the M.P. Accommodation Control Act, 1961 would apply to the suit filed on 8-3-1989 ?' 3. On a bare perusal of the aforesaid … Section 88 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (Bombay LXVII of 1948). The Government of Bombay is pleased to cancel Government Notification

Mamta Dinesh Vakil Vs. Bansi S. Wadhwa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

article 15(1). 71. Similarly in the case of GirdharGopal Vs. State AIR 1953 M.B. 147 the discrimination under Article 15(1) not only on the ground … not hit by Article 15. 80. Similarly in the case of K. Ramakrishna Vs. Osmania University AIR 1962 Andhra Pradesh 120 the classification which was geographical was held not discriminatory of Article 14 or 15(1) even if … constitution of India came to be in force). 67. The discrimination against women (and not in favour … time of the execution of the Will. They had no issues. Her husband as well as she are stated to have been later murdered by a nepali servant. The husband is stated to have several brothers and … Class II of the Schedule to Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act. She claims to exclude the maternal aunt who is shown to fall

Good Year India Ltd., Jaipur Vs. Industrial Tribunal, Rajasthan, Jaipu ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1), 12(4) and 12(5); Constitution of India - Article 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11

Reported in : AIR1969Raj95; (1968)IILLJ682Raj

Supreme Court in the State of Madras v. C. P. Sarathy, AIR 1953 SC 53 = (1953) 1 Lab LJ 174.'But, it must be remembered … 276 the Government of Madras had declined to make a reference of a labour dispute. The Government of Andhra, its successor, after consideration of the subsequent events, came to a conclusion that there was a dispute, which … was made area supervisor. As an area supervisor, Shri Dhingra was in charge of the whole of the State of Rajasthan and a few towns of Madhya Pradesh. On 16-12-66, when his services were terminated by the … Year India Ltd., is a company duly incorporated under the Indian Companies Act having its Head Office at 225-C Acharya Jagdish Bose Road, Calcutta with … therefore, not a workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter

Hardwari Lal Vs. G.D. Tapase and ors.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Maharshi Dayanand University Act, 1975 - Sections 9; ;Maharshi Dayanand University (Amendment) Act, 1980; Rohtak University Act, 1975; University Grants Commission Act - Sections 12-A; Osmania University Act of 1959; Osmania University (Amendment) Act, 1966

Reported in : AIR1982P& H439

penalty of compulsory retirement. Against that order he preferred an appeal to the Governor of Madras. After the Andhra State was formed, the papers were transferred to the Governor of Andhra for disposal. When the petitioner wrote to … Nath Bajoria v. State of West Bengal, 1954 SCR 30 : (AIR 1953 SC 404) (I); V. M. Syed Mohammad & Co. v. State of … when he was appointed as Vice-Chancellor, was already 67 years of age and that if the provisions … validity of Haryana Ordinance No. 5 of 1980 (hereinafter called the Ordinance) and the Maharshi Dayanand University (Amendment) Act, 1980 (Haryana Act No. 40 of 1980) (hereinafter called the Amendment Act) and has also prayed for issuance … No. 5 of 1980 on 1st of Nov., 1980, by which after Section 9 of the Maharshi Dayanand University Act, 1975, S. 9-A was inserted

M/s Ferns Builders And Developers Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

AND OTHERS.8. (1968) 3 SCR662 AIR1969SC78 22 STC416: DHULABHAI Vs. STATE OF M.P.9. (1982) 2 SCC134 GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. THUMMALA KRISHNA RAO AND ANOTHER. 10.(2017) 13 SCC661 M. SANKARANARAYANAN Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE. 11.(1989) 4 … to be filed. 4.22 It is further contended that even in case where a final determination either under Section 67 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act or Section 48-A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act or there being a

Vittal Shetty Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

AND OTHERS.8. (1968) 3 SCR662 AIR1969SC78 22 STC416: DHULABHAI Vs. STATE OF M.P.9. (1982) 2 SCC134 GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. THUMMALA KRISHNA RAO AND ANOTHER. 10.(2017) 13 SCC661 M. SANKARANARAYANAN Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE. 11.(1989) 4 … to be filed. 4.22 It is further contended that even in case where a final determination either under Section 67 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act or Section 48-A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act or there being a

G Lakshmanappa Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Land Acquisition

AND OTHERS.8. (1968) 3 SCR662 AIR1969SC78 22 STC416: DHULABHAI Vs. STATE OF M.P.9. (1982) 2 SCC134 GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESH VS. THUMMALA KRISHNA RAO AND ANOTHER. 10.(2017) 13 SCC661 M. SANKARANARAYANAN Vs. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BANGALORE. 11.(1989) 4 … to be filed. 4.22 It is further contended that even in case where a final determination either under Section 67 of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act or Section 48-A of Karnataka Land Reforms Act or there being a