Advanced Search Results

Bommisetty Prasada Rao, and Others Vs. Sas Mines and Minerals Ltd., Hy ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 9 and 11; Andhra Pradesh Civil Court, Act, 1972 - Sections 32, 33 and 34; Andhra State Act, 1953 - Sections 30; State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 52; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 71 and 72; The Madras High Court (Jurisdictional Limit) Act, 1927 - Sections 2; Madras Civil Court Act, 1873 - Sections 10, 12 and 16; Madras High Court (Territorial Limits) Act, 1927 - Sections 2; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Civil Court Act, 1873; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Civil Court Act, 1954; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Civil Court Act, 1974 - Sections 3 and 5; Constitution of India - Article 225; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Indian Divorce Act, 1945; Representation of Peoples Act

Reported in : 1999(3)ALD358; 1999(3)ALT521; [1999]98CompCas48(AP)

Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh

In Re: S. Seshagirirao

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Criminal Rules of Practice - Rule 184, 184(1), 184(2) and 252; Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 4(1) - Schedule - Article 6; Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 554, 554(2) and 561-A; Andhra State Act, 1953 - Sections 32; Character Act, 1861 - Sections 9; Government of India Act, 1915; Government of India Act, 1935

Reported in : AIR1966AP137; 1966CriLJ512

Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh

Poona Electric Supply Co. Ltd. and anr. Vs. State

Court : Mumbai

Subject : ElectricityCriminal

Acts : Electricity Act, 1910 - Sections 23 and 33(1); Electricity (Amendment) Act, 1959; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 24; Constitution of India - Article 20(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1967Bom27; (1965)67BOMLR534; 1967CriLJ155; ILR1966Bom154

been issued by the Government of Bombay on the 9th of February 1953, prescribing the requirements of the notice contemplated by S. 33 and the … the provisions re-enacted.(11) Mr. nariman then invited my attention to the decision of a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in In re, Lingareddi 24. Mr. Justice Bhimasankaram considered the meaning of the expression 'law … by the Indian Standards Institution. On these and other allegations it was stated that accused Nos. 2 and 3 who were in charge of the … the Act not having provided for the form in which and the time within which the notice under Section 33(1) was required to be given, there was no obligation to give any such notice. In the alternative, it

Buddala Veerabhadra Rao Vs. Duddumpudi Venkatraju and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1966CriLJ1080

Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh

Commissioner of Wealth-tax Vs. Bhaskar Mitter

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Wealth Tax Act, 1957 - Section 5(1) and 5(1A); ;Estate Duty Act, 1953 - Section 33 and 33(1)

Reported in : [1993]202ITR612(Cal)

on the aforesaid decision of this court. Apart from it, reference was made to the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in the case of CED v. Estate of Late Sanka Simhachalam : [1975]99ITR370(AP) . The … view of the aforesaid interpretation given to the word ' belonging' in Section 33(1) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953, which we, in view of the definition of the expression ' asset' in Section 2(e) of the Act, … the assessee, admittedly, has only a life interest therein ?' 2. Shortly stated, the facts are that the assessee, an individual, held Government securities on

Mamta Dinesh Vakil Vs. Bansi S. Wadhwa

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

article 15(1). 71. Similarly in the case of GirdharGopal Vs. State AIR 1953 M.B. 147 the discrimination under Article 15(1) not only on the ground … not hit by Article 15. 80. Similarly in the case of K. Ramakrishna Vs. Osmania University AIR 1962 Andhra Pradesh 120 the classification which was geographical was held not discriminatory of Article 14 or 15(1) even if … are not concerned with the brother's Will also. 33. The aforesaid evidence shows due execution and attestation … time of the execution of the Will. They had no issues. Her husband as well as she are stated to have been later murdered by a nepali servant. The husband is stated to have several brothers and … Class II of the Schedule to Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act. She claims to exclude the maternal aunt who is shown to fall

Rayalaseema Bank Ltd. Vs. Tharigopala Pedda Narayanappa and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ArbitrationCivil

Acts : Arbitration Act, 1940 - Sections 39(1) and 39(2)

Reported in : AIR1961AP483

Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh

Jawajee Nagnatham Vs. Revenue Divisional Officer, Adilabad, A.P. and o ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Stamp Act, 1899 - Sections 47A; Land Acquisition Act - Sections 4(1), 18, 23 and 28; Andhra Pradesh Land Acquisition (Amendment) Act, 1953 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1994(1)BLJR744; JT1994(2)SC604; 1994(2)SCALE298; (1994)4SCC595; [1994]1SCR368; 1994(2)LC17(SC); MANU/SC/0745/1994

either for public purpose by the Central Government or the State Government. Section 33 of the State Amendment Act, 1953 amended the interest payable under the Act and reduced the rate of interest from 6% to 4% uniformly … situated in Ward No. 5, Block No. 7 in Adilabad Municipality of Andhra Pradesh, which was proposed for acquisition under notification issued under Section 4(1) … arbitrary. It is also contended that the appellant is entitled to interest at 6% under the Act. The State Act has no application to and the owner cannot be discriminated in payment only at the rate of 4%,

Nandanam Construction Co. Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Hyderabad

Subject : Direct Taxation

Reported in : (1985)13ITD916(Hyd.)

husk. He pointed out that the most compelling reason for the Commissioner's conclusion was the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court (which was binding on him) in the case of CIT v. Nawab Mir Barkat Ali … for example, has held in the case of Addl. CIT v. U.P. State Agro Industrial Corporation Ltd. [1981] 127 ITR 97 had held that delay … Vol. 1, 1985 edn.,p. 1537) has taken the view that relief under Section 33(1)(n) of the Estate Duty Act, 1953 is to be given even when there is less than full ownership. He also referred the circular regarding

Mahendra R. Saraf and ors. Vs. Goldstone Technologies Limited and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Arbitration

Acts : Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 2(1) 9, 10, 11, 11(6), 33 and 36; Arbitration and Conciliation Rules, 1996 - Rule 3(1); Madras High Court (Jurisdictional Limit) Act, 1927; Madras Civil Court Act, 1873; Indian Companies Act; Indian Divorce Act; Representation of Peoples Act

Reported in : 2002(1)ALD824; 2002(1)ALT516

Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh