Advanced Search Results
Bommisetty Prasada Rao, and Others Vs. Sas Mines and Minerals Ltd., Hy ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-28-1999
Arbitration
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Sections 2, 9 and 11; Andhra Pradesh Civil Court, Act, 1972 - Sections 32, 33 and 34; Andhra State Act, 1953 - Sections 30; State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 52; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 71 and 72; The Madras High Court (Jurisdictional Limit) Act, 1927 - Sections 2; Madras Civil Court Act, 1873 - Sections 10, 12 and 16; Madras High Court (Territorial Limits) Act, 1927 - Sections 2; Andhra Pradesh (Andhra Area) Civil Court Act, 1873; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Civil Court Act, 1954; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Civil Court Act, 1974 - Sections 3 and 5; Constitution of India - Article 225; Indian Companies Act, 1956; Indian Divorce Act, 1945; Representation of Peoples Act
1999(3)ALD358; 1999(3)ALT521; [1999]98CompCas48(AP)
Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPrabhakar Rao N. Mawle Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh
Supreme Court of India
Apr-09-1965
Civil
Consolidation Act, 1925 - Sections 51; Andhra State Act, 1953 - Sections 28, 28(2), 30, 53, 54 and 55; State Reorganisation Act, 1956 - Sections 3, 65, 65(1), 119 and 121; Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 1949 - Sections 2 and 2(1) ; Madras Vexatious Litigation (Prevention) Act, 1949; Companies Act; Banking Companies Act; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 132, 133, 134, 225, 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 2; Government of India Act, 1935; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(44)
AIR1965SC1827; [1965]3SCR743
a Court of Record or otherwise. 9. When the State of Andhra was formed in 1953 by the Andhra State Act of 1953, the High Court of Madras ceased to exercise jurisdiction over the territory of the State of … was carved out of the territories of the State of Madras by the Andhra State Act 30 of 1953. Section 28 of that Act provided : '(1) As from the 1st day of January, 1956, or such earlier … The Act with which we are concerned, though a copy substantially of 16 and 17 Vict. Ch. 30 (now replaced by section 51 of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMamta Dinesh Vakil Vs. Bansi S. Wadhwa
Mumbai
Nov-06-2012
Land Acquisition
in the case of GirdharGopal Vs. State AIR 1953 M.B. 147 the discrimination under Article 15(1) not … not hit by Article 15. 80. Similarly in the case of K. Ramakrishna Vs. Osmania University AIR 1962 Andhra Pradesh 120 the classification which was geographical was held not discriminatory of Article 14 or 15(1) even if … (1) The property of a female Hindu dying intestate shall devolve according to the rules set out in section 16, - (a) firstly, upon the sons and daughters (including the children of any predeceased son or daughter) and … Will. They had no issues. Her husband as well as she are stated to have been later murdered by a nepali servant. The husband is … Class II of the Schedule to Section 8 of the Hindu Succession Act. She claims to exclude the maternal aunt who is shown to fall
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Srinivasan (N.A.) Vs. State of Andhra (Secretary, Public Works and Tra ...
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-21-1959
Labour and Industrial
(1959)IILLJ569AP
concerned that could proceed against the officer.7. The answer to this depends upon the relevant provisions of the Andhra State Act (XXX of 1953). Section 58 of this Act provides for the continuance of proceedings pending immediately before the … towards the cost of repairing a portable telephone instrument belonging to Bellary Electrical Substation into one for Rs. 16 and misappropriating the difference of Rs. 10.5. On a consideration of the evidence of several witnesses during the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCommissioner of Sales Tax, Maharashtra State, Bombay Vs. Rajendra Moto ...
Mumbai
Dec-13-1984
Sales Tax
Andhra Pradesh General Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14, 14(1), 16(4), 17(1), 36 and 38; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 14, 14(1), 17, 18, 33, 35, 36, 36(2), 36(3), 38, 38(4) and 61(1)
[1985]59STC155(Bom)
out that the aforesaid decision of the Supreme Court has been considered by a Division Bench of the Andhra Pradesh High Court on Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Hyderabad v. R. D. Chand : [1977]108ITR787(AP) . In that case … whether a penalty could be validly imposed on an assessee under section 16(4) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 during the period covered by stay orders issued by the appellant and revisional authorities against the recovery of … been submitted to us for determination in this reference, on a case stated, by the Sales Tax Tribunal under section 61(1) of the Bombay Sales
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPithapuram Taluk Tobacco, Cigars and Soda Merchants' Union Vs. State o ...
Andhra Pradesh
Nov-04-1957
Sales Tax
Constitution of India, 1950 - Article 226; Taxation Act, 1939
[1958]9STC723(AP)
P. Jaganmohan Reddy, J.1. These four writ petitions are directed against the State of Andhra Pradesh challenging the levy of sales tax at six pies per rupee on the turnover of cigars and … 'taxed tobacco as defined in section 2, clause (13), of the Madras Tobacco (Taxation of Sales and Registration) Act, 1953, (Madras Act IV of 1953)' were substituted by section 2(i) of Act XIV of 1955. Section 2(13) of … in prices corresponding more or less to the amount of the tax.' 16. These observations do not, however, help the argument that the tax is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJayantilal Thakordas Vs. State of Gujarat
Gujarat
Jul-02-1968
Sales Tax
Andhra Pradesh Gen. Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14(4)
(1968)0GLR886; [1969]23STC11(Guj)
In support of this proposition, he relied on the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in State of Andhra Pradesh v. Ravuri Narasimloo ([1965] … Divan, J. 1. In this reference under section 34 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the following two questions have been referred to us by the Sales … Chettiar & Sons v. Joint Commercial Tax Officer III ([1966] 18 S.T.C. 357.) There it was held that section 16(1) of the Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1959, does not include the power to assess by best judgment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoti Ram (Dead) Through L.Rs. and ors. Vs. Bhagat Singh and ors. Etc.
Himachal Pradesh
Jan-06-2000
Property
Himachal Pradesh Abolition of Big Landed Estates and Land Reforms Act, 1954 - Section 62; ;Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Section 6; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Section 9; ;Limitation Act, 1963
AIR2000HP123
after the formation of the State of Andhra and the transfer of territories from Madras to Mysore under Andhra State Act, 1953. The Full Bench held that the binding nature of the precedents of one Court on another depends upon … dispossessed him from the suit land and raised construction over it, therefore, he had filed a petition under Section 62 of the H.P. Abolition of Big Landed Estates Act, 1955 (for short the 'Act'), for the restoration … in Dhannu alias Dhani Ram v. Ramesh Kumar, 1997 (1) Sim LJ 165, and held that the suits filed by the tenants to recover possession
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskIn Re: S. Seshagirirao
Andhra Pradesh
Apr-16-1965
CriminalConstitution
Criminal Rules of Practice - Rule 184, 184(1), 184(2) and 252; Andhra Pradesh Court Fees and Suits Valuation Act, 1956 - Sections 4 and 4(1) - Schedule - Article 6; Constitution of India - Articles 225 and 227; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 554, 554(2) and 561-A; Andhra State Act, 1953 - Sections 32; Character Act, 1861 - Sections 9; Government of India Act, 1915; Government of India Act, 1935
AIR1966AP137; 1966CriLJ512
Matched in: Court Andhra Pradesh
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskU.P. Co-operative Cane Unions Federations Vs. West U.P. Sugar Mills As ...
Supreme Court of India
May-05-2004
Constitution
Sugarcane (Control) Order 1966 - Sections 5A; Uttar Pradesh Sugarcane Supply and Purchase Order, 1954; Sugarcane (Regulation and Purchase) Act 1953 - Sections 2, 5, 7, 15, 15(1), 15(2), 15(4), 16, 16(2), 17, 26 and 28; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 3, 3(2) and 3(3C); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 32, 162, 254, 254(2), 358, 369 and 366(29); Sugarcane Act, 1934; Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 125B; Uttar Pradesh (Regulation of Supply and Purchase) Rules, 1954 - Rules 21, 38A, 38A(4), 94, 96, 96(1) and 100; Madras Essential Articles Control and Requisitioning (Temporary Powers) Act, 1949 - Sections 3(1); Electricity Act - Sections 22; Mines and Minerals (Regulation and Development) Act, 1957; Cinemas Regulation Act, 1952; Indian Sales of Goods Act, 1930
AIR2004SC3697; 2004(3)CTC590; (2004)5SCC430
of 1997 filed by the State of Bihar is hereby dismissed.STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH140. The State Government's power was sought to be traced to the … dismissed.STATE OF PUNJAB142. In this State, the corresponding legislation is the Punjab Sugarcane (Regulation of Purchase and Supply) Act, 1953 together with the Rules made thereunder. The power of the State Government to fix the price is sought … more important controversy is about the State Government's power to fix the price. Such power is traced to Section 16 of the U.P. Act by the learned counsel appearing for the State and the Cooperative Cane Unions. There
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »