Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: andhra state act 1953 section 15 · Page 1 of about 2,029 results (0.096 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Mar 04 1976

The Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. P. Ambalal and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-1976

Subject : Direct Taxation

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 14(4), 14(5), 14(6), 14(7) and 15

Reported in : (1976)5CTR(Bom)460

15 of the said Act and relying upon the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in State of Andhra Pradesh vs. Ravuri Narsingh, (1965 … Bench two questions, namely :- '(1) Whether the Assistant Commissioner while dealing with the turnover escaping assessment under section 15 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 was competent to make a best judgment assessment of the escaped … Madon, J.1. Both these References under section 34(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, arise out of order of reassessment made against the Respondents who were registered as dealer under the said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1976

Commissioner of Sales Tax Vs. P. Ambalal and Co.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-04-1976

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 - Sections 2(1), 14, 14(3), 14(4), 15 and 15(1)

Reported in : [1976]384STC333(Bom)

15 of the said Act and relying upon the judgment of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in State of Andhra Pradesh v. Ravuri Narasimloo [1965] … Bench two questions, namely : '(1) Whether the Assistant Commissioner, while dealing with the turnover escaping assessment under section 15 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, was competent to make a best judgment assessment of the escaped … Madon, J. 1. Both these references under section 34(1) of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, arise out of an order of reassessment made against the respondents, who were registered as dealers under the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 22 1955

Public Prosecutor Vs. Mullangi Soolappa

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Jul-22-1955

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 15; Madras General Sales Tax Rules, 1939 - Rule 28; Andhra State Act, 1953 - Sections 41(2)

Reported in : AIR1955Kant151; AIR1955Mys151; 1955CriLJ1614; [1956]7STC22(Kar)

provisional assessment for the year 1951-52 on or before the specified date.In pursuance of Section 41(2) of the Andhra State Act, 1953, the Chief Justice of Madras transferred the appeal to the High Court of Mysore.2. In the trial Court, … with Rule 28, Madras General Sales Tax Rules, and this defect exonerated the accused from the operation of Section 15 (b) of the Act since, in the absence of a valid service of the notices, no question of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Jul 02 1968

Jayantilal Thakordas Vs. State of Gujarat

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Jul-02-1968

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Gen. Sales Tax Act, 1957 - Sections 14(4)

Reported in : (1968)0GLR886; [1969]23STC11(Guj)

In support of this proposition, he relied on the decision of the Andhra Pradesh High Court in State of Andhra Pradesh v. Ravuri Narasimloo ([1965] … Divan, J. 1. In this reference under section 34 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the following two questions have been referred to us by the Sales … the tax, if any, due from the dealer in respect of such period and all subsequent periods.' 16. Section 15 of the Act provided as follows :- '15. (1) If in consequence of any information which has come

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 17 1996

A. Srinath and Others Vs. the Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corp ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Apr-17-1996

Subject : Constitution Civil Subject:

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Order 47, Rules 1, 5, 6 and 9 - Order IX; Constitution of India - Articles 26, 162, 246, 225, 226 and 227; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1908 - Sections 15, 44, 114, 117 and 141; Andhra State Act, 1953; Government of India Act, 1915 - Sections 107, 108 and 108(1); Government of India (Amendment) Act, 1935 - Sections 223; Trade Marks Act; Indian High Courts Act, 1861 - Sections 13; General Clauses Act - Sections 8; Interpretation Act; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) ; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) 1882 - Sections 540, 623, 624 and 627; States Reorganisation Act;

Reported in : AIR1996AP309; 1996(2)ALT893; (1997)ILLJ255AP

created, and reconstituted by the Letters Patent dated 28-12-1865. On creation of the State of Andhra under the Andhra State Act, 1953 (30 of 1953) and the State of Andhra Pradesh under the States Reorganisation Act, 1956 (Act 37 of … Subramaniya Aiyar relies on Sabapathi Chetty v. Narayanaswamy Chetty, (1908) 11 Mad LJ 346 for the proposition that Section 15 of the Letters Patent is not controlled by the Code of Civil Procedure. All that was decided in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 08 1969

Roopchand Raghavji Phande and ors. Vs. Abhyankar and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Dec-08-1969

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953 - Sections 2(6), 5, 7-A, 9, 10, 10-AA, 13, 13(1), 13(2), 13(4), 13(5), 14, 14(3), 15, 16, 18-B, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 26(3), 31, 36, 36-A, 39-A, 76 and 77; Bombay Sales Tax (Amendment) Act, 1959 - Sections 2(11), 2(19), 3, 15(1), 11, 12, 18, 19, 19(3), 32, 33, 34 and 44; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1950; Bombay Sales Tax (Validating Provisions) Act, 1957 - Sections 2(1); Bombay General Clauses Act, 1904 - Sections 3(35); Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 2(2), 3, 22(2) and 33(4); Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939; East Punjab General Sales Tax Act, 1948 - Sections 16; Sales Tax Law; East Punjab General Sales Tax Rules, 1949 - Rule 40; Indian Sale of Goods Act

Reported in : AIR1970Bom351

other documents. Another notice was also sent on the said day to the firm purporting to be under Section 15 of the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, calling upon the firm to show cause why the assessment already … (1955) 6 STC 657 (AP) in which a Division Bench of the Andhra High Court consisting of Subba Rao. C, J. and Satyanarayana Baju, J., … India raise an important question relating to assessment of a dissolved partnership firm under the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1953, and the Bombay Sales Tax Act, 11959. Miscellaneous Application 564 of 1965 is a petition filed on the … 13, 1962, and as the firm had already closed its business as stated above in or about May 1961, the Sales Tax Officer, B-II Ward

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 11 1958

M.P.V. Sundararamier and Co. Vs. the State of Andhra Pradesh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-11-1958

Subject : Sales TaxConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 246, 286, 286(1), 286(2), 301 and 372; Madras General Sales Tax Act, 1939 - Sections 2 and 22; Sales Tax Laws Validation Act, 1956 - Sections 2; Impugned Act

Reported in : AIR1958SC468; (1958)IMLJ179(SC); [1958]1SCR1422; [1958]9STC298(SC)

Madras to enact a law to operate in another State. But it isargued that s. 53 of the Andhra State Act, 1953, on its true interpretationenacts that though for political purposes Andhra is to be regarded as aseparate State, for … those laws is Madras General Sales Tax Act (Madras 9 of 1939),hereinafter referred to as the Madras Act. Section 54 of the Andhra State Actconferred on the Government a power to adapt laws for the purpose of … 1955, noticesto the petitioners to send their returns of turnover by July 15, 1955, failingwhich it was stated that assessment would be made on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 06 1954

M. Subbarayudu and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-06-1954

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1898 - Sections 209 and 437; Andhra State Act, 1953 - Sections 53

Reported in : AIR1955AP87; 1955CriLJ770

and 437 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1898, Section 395 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 and Section 53 of Andhra State Act, 1953 - petitioners discharged by Sub-Divisional Magistrate (SDM) from offence charged under Section 395 and converted case into calendar … When India became a Dominion by virtue of the Indian Independence Act of 1947 which took effect on 15.8.1947, there was no change in the constitution of the High Court. When India became a Republic, the jurisdiction

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 1959

Mukundas Proprietor, Krishna Cycle Stores, Secunderabad Vs. State of A ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-13-1959

Subject : Sales Tax

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 286; Andhra Pradesh Adaptation of Laws Order, 1957; Madras General Sales Tax Act; Hyderabad General Sales Tax Act

Reported in : AIR1960AP298; [1960]11STC420(AP)

The Constitution (Seventh Amendment) Act, 1956, included the territories specified in Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the Andhra State Act, 1953, and the territories specified in Sub-section (1) of Section 3 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 14 1959

Srimanthu Rajah Yarlagadda Sivarama Prasad Bahadur Zamindar Garu and o ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-14-1959

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 260; Limitation Act, 1908 - Schedule - Article 151; Andhra State Act, 1953 - Sections 32 and 55; ;Andhra Pradesh Appellate Side Rules - Rule 51

Reported in : AIR1960AP364

- Article 226 of Constitution of India, Article 151 of Limitation Act, 1908, Sections 32 and 55 of Andhra State Act, 1953, Rule 51 of Andhra Pradesh Appellate Side Rules and High Court Orders and Rules - appeal preferred against … reference, for the reason that the Andhra High Court was formed long after. Be that as it may, Section 32 of the Andhra State Act (Act XXX of 1953) has made the law in force in regard … contended before us by Sri Manavala Choudary and Sri Veerabhadrayya that Article 151 of the Indian Limitation Act, which prescribes a period of 20 days

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial