Advanced Search Results
Jodh Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.
Himachal Pradesh
Oct-26-1999
Criminal
Constitution of India - Articles 32, 136, 226 and 227; ;Army Act, 1950 - Sections 69 and 354; ;Ranbir Penal Code (IPC), 1989 Smvt. - Sections 97, 300 and 302; ;Probation of Offenders Act - Sections 3 and 4; ;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 23(3), 149 and 151 to 165; ;Evidence Act - Section 105; ;Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Section 97; ;Navy Act, 1957; ;Air Force Act, 1950
2000CriLJ2393
dealt with the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act is a complete code by itself … Pratap Singh and the case of the petitioner was covered under Section 105 of the Evidence Act and Section 97 of the Ranbir Penal Code equivalent to Section 97 of the Indian Penal Code.14. We have given out
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAir Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...
Guwahati
Aug-17-2013
Education
records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … discreet enquiry only on 09.03.2012, but he had had already requested for the call records of telephone No. 9707791027, belonging to Ms. ‘X, from the local police, on 7.03.2012 itself, though the anonymous letter did not contain
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskDevi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Feb-25-2010
Criminal
would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, heirs and successors in so for … have been answered in paragraphs 77, 79, 80,81, 82, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98, 100 and 101, which are being extracted below:77. To express our … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Rev. Stainislaus Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and ors.
Madhya Pradesh
Apr-23-1974
Constitution
Madhya Pradesh Dharma Swatantrya Adhiniyam, 1968 - Sections 3, 4 and 5; Constitution of India - Articles 20(3), 25 and 25(1)
AIR1975MP163
Punamchand Gandhi v. State of Bombay, AIR 1954 SC 388, wherein the provisions of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, were challenged on the ground that they contravene Articles 25 and 26 of the Constitution of India. Attention … mentions that it is for providing prohibition of conversion from one religion to another by the use of force or allurement or by fraudulent means and for matters incidental thereto. Of course, it is true that the … of the Seventh Schedule. But, in fact it falls within Entry No. 97 of List I of the Seventh Schedule and as such, the Parliament … Magistrate, Balodabazar, sanctioned prosecution of the petitioner for the alleged offences under Sections 3, 4, 5 (2) and Section 6 of the Madhya Pradesh Dharma
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCol. Dhama B.S. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Aug-18-1999
ServiceCivil
Air Force Act, 1969 - Sections 102 and 103; Constitution of India - Article 226
81(1999)DLT255; 1999(51)DRJ15
absentee and absented himself without leave on the following occasions and thus committing offence under Section 39 of Air Force Act, 1950. From 0730 h 16.11.96 to 0730 h 18.11.96 From 0730 h 17.12.96 to 0730 h 19.12.96 From 0730 … Force Hospital Hindan. But Col. Dhama BS did not turn up with the child. That on 14 Feb. 97, Col. Dhama B.S. filed an Additional Affidavit and the Hon'ble Court was pleased to direct the Chief of
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJ.W.O. B.K. Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.
Kolkata
Aug-11-2000
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227;; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 4(XV), 34 to 71, 110, 121, 152, 153 and 161;; Army Rules - Rule 37;; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 34 to 38, 40, 40(1), 43 and 43(2), (3) and (8);; Station Routine Orders
(2000)3CALLT528(HC)
by any officer empowered for that behalf by warrant of the Central Government under section 153 of the Air Force Act. 1950 (for short 'the Act'). The respondent has moved CAN No 7513 of 1999 for vacating and/or recalling the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers Association
Mumbai
Apr-26-2001
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10(1)
2002(2)ALLMR405; [2001(90)FLR971]; (2001)IILLJ1421Bom
led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or (ii) … before the Court in Appeal No. 441 of 2000. The Reference was made by the appropriate Government under Section 10(1)(d) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The learned single Judge having affirmed the award of the Industrial
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEmployees' State Insurance Corporation, Regional Office (Karnataka), B ...
Karnataka
Feb-28-2001
Labour and Industrial
Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9), 46, 46(1), 75, 95 and 97; Employees' State Insurance (General) Regulations, 1950 - Regulation 4; Apprentices Act, 1961; Workmen's Compensation Act - Sections 4
2003ACJ577; [2002(92)FLR1177]; ILR2002KAR448; 2002(1)KarLJ379; (2002)ILLJ979Kant
I should point out here that the Regulations 1950 came to be published by the ESI Corporation under Section 97 of the Act and that being the position, the Regulations 1950 has to be in aid and in … standing orders of the establishment; but does not include--) (a) any member of (the Indian) naval, military or air forces; or (b) any person so employed whose wages (excluding remuneration for overtime work) exceed (such wages as … not include--) (a) any member of (the Indian) naval, military or air forces; or (b) any person so employed whose wages (excluding remuneration for overtime
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMukand Ltd. Vs. Mukand Staff and Officers Association and ors.
Mumbai
Nov-30-1999
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 2
(2000)ILLJ1583Bom
led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) … By an order dated February 17, 1993 the Government of Maharashtra in exercise of its powers conferred by Section 10(1)(d) of the Act, referred an industrial dispute, which in its opinion, existed between the Mukand Limited and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSyed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-07-1999
ContractConstitution
Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B
2000(1)ALD689
with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act is a complete code by itself … taken me to the various provisions of Chapter IX of the Railways Act, 1989 (for short the Act). Section 64 of the Act contemplates that every person entrusting any goods to a railway administration for carriage shall
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »