Advanced Search Results

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Mr. Gulshan Bajwa

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 13; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 17(5) and 19(3); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 65, 110 and 161(2); Constitution of India - Article 215; Contempt of Courts (Amendment) Act; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT111

the petitioner under arrest; the purported order dated 14.1.1985 passed by the Central Government under Section 161(2) of Air Force Act, 1950; Section 65 & 110 of Air Force Act; the order for arrest of the petitioner during the trial by … of Dr. Mukundakam Sharma, J and Hima Kohli, J, on 8.8.2006 having perused the contents of CM No. 9695/2006, directed the Registry to issue notice to the petitioner to show cause why appropriate action under the provisions

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … Court of Inquiry consisting of officers, who are subordinate to him and are required to report to him. 96. While dealing with the Court of Inquiry, imperative it is to note, as we have already pointed out

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, heirs and successors in so for … particular Tribunal is challenged) by overlooking the jurisdiction of the concerned Tribunal. 96. The directions issued by us in respect of making the decisions of … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … R. Venkata Rao v. Secretary of State 0043/1936 , the Privy Council dealing with the scope of Section 96-B of the Government of India Act, 1919 took the view that redressal was not obtainable by Courts for

Mrs. Pramila Nesargi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 3; ;Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937 - Rules 5(1), 14(3) and 14(5); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52 and 57

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1810

229 of the Constitution of India and is therefore, void and unenforceable in law.27. Section 45 of the Air Force Act, 1950 provides for punishment for the officer governed by the Act who behave in a manner unbecoming of his … The communication is to the following effect:HO Training CommandIndian Air ForceJC Nagar PostBangalore - 560 006TC/612/AOC-in-C 07 Nov 96Shri R. Roshan BaigHonourable Minister of Statefor Home and WakfsGovernment of Karnataka Vidhana Soudha,Bangalore - 560 001MISS WORLD PAGEANT

Ex. Sq. Leader Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air force Rules, 1969 - Rule 17

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ652

him to show cause as to why he should not be removed from the service under Section 19, Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 17 Air Force Rules, 1969 for avoiding flying duties and showing lack of confidence in

Col. Dhama B.S. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Air Force Act, 1969 - Sections 102 and 103; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 81(1999)DLT255; 1999(51)DRJ15

absentee and absented himself without leave on the following occasions and thus committing offence under Section 39 of Air Force Act, 1950. From 0730 h 16.11.96 to 0730 h 18.11.96 From 0730 h 17.12.96 to 0730 h 19.12.96 From 0730

Ex. Sq. Leader Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 17

Reported in : 76(1998)DLT554

him to show cause as to why he should not be removed from the service under Section 19, Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 17, Air Force Rules, 1969 for avoiding flying duties and showing lack of confidence in

D.P Tripathy Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : MRTP

read and explained the provision of Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 142 of the Air Force Act to the appellant and suggested to him to withdraw his plea of guilty. The court advised the appellant … the authorities were not convinced and court martialled him for the following offences. FIRST CHARGE SECTION 39(b) AF ACT 1950 WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE OVERSTAYING LEAVE GRANTED TO HIM in that he, at No. 77 SU, AF having been … 77 SU, AF having been granted leave of absence from 10 Jun 96 to 21 Jun 96 with prefix on 08 and 09 Jun 96

Sgt Mohanti Bk Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Service

There was no illegality in detailing Sgts for guard duty as the provision for the same exist in Air force Regulations 1964. It was therefore decided that the number of guards was to be increased and to cater … IN THE EXECUTION OF THIS OFFICEIn that he,At Srinagar, on 23 Jan 96 when ordered by Fit Lt Ashok Kumar (19662-S) A (L) offg. Adjutant … convened on 27 March 1996 and he was tried on the following charges:First Charges Section 41 (1) AF Act 1950DISOBEYING, SUCH MANNER AS TO SHOW WILFUL DEFIANCE OF AUTHORITY, A LAWFUL COMMAN GIVEN PERSONALLY BY HIS SUPERIOR … was tried on the following charges:First Charges Section 41 (1) AF Act 1950DISOBEYING, SUCH MANNER AS TO SHOW WILFUL DEFIANCE OF AUTHORITY, A LAWFUL COMMAN