Advanced Search Results

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … Army Act or the Navy Act and any person legally exercising authority under him or on his behalf.” 93. A careful reading of Section 108 makes it clear that this Section (Section 108) embodies the duties of

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, heirs and successors in so for … and they have been answered in paragraphs 77, 79, 80,81, 82, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98, 100 and 101, which are being extracted below:77. To … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the

Sri Ramadas Motor Transport Private Ltd. Vs. Vijayawada Municipality R ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Andhra Pradesh District Municipalities Act, 1920 - Sections 3(8), 80, 92, 93, 93(1), 93(2), 93(4) and 95; Andhra Pradesh General Clauses Act, 1891 - Sections 3(22); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3 and 3(42); Madras Village Panchayats Act, 1950 - Sections 2(4), 65 and 65(5); Madras Local Boards Act, 1920; Contonments Act, 1924; Income-tax Act, 1922 - Sections 10; Madras City Municipal Act, 1919; Indian Cantonments Act, 1910

Reported in : AIR1968AP160

had some difference as compared to the original dules which were in force before the amendment.13. In Emperor v. Mahamed Kassam, AIR 1942 Bom 39, … 'office' and 'place of employment'11. In Municipal Council, Tuticorin v. Ralli Bros., AIR 1934 Mad 420 the question arose whether Messrs. Ralli Bros., whose principal … 28-9-1962 in S. A. No. 989 of 1957 (Andh Pra) regarding Section 65 of the Madras Village Panchayats Act, 1950 (Madras Act 10 of 1950) which was substantially similar to the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh District Municipalities … with the District Municipality Act, 1920 as it stood amended and not with the District Municipalities Act. 1965.6. Section 93 of the Act runs as follows:--'Section 93(1). If the council by a resolution determines that a profession tax

Prakash Babu Bajpai Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1995(3)WLC307; 1995(2)WLN22

him to show cause as to why administrative action of removal from services under Section 20(3) of the Air Force Act, 1950 for contracting plural marriage with Ms. Poonam Agnihotri on 14th Dec. 91 in New Delhi should not be … marriages were prohibited under para 578 of the requlations for the Air Force (RE), 1964. On 4th Jan. 93, the petitioner replied to the aforesaid show cause notice taking a stand that his marriage with Ms. Gayatri

Ex. Sq. Leader Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 17

Reported in : 76(1998)DLT554

him to show cause as to why he should not be removed from the service under Section 19, Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 17, Air Force Rules, 1969 for avoiding flying duties and showing lack of confidence in … July, 1994. The order reads as under:'1. WHEREAS. a Show Cause Notice No. Air HQ/21641/16068/P01(F) dated 12 Feb. 93 was served on Sqn.Ldr.A.Gupta (16068) F(P) requiring him to show cause as to why he should not be

Ex. Sq. Leader Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air force Rules, 1969 - Rule 17

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ652

him to show cause as to why he should not be removed from the service under Section 19, Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 17 Air Force Rules, 1969 for avoiding flying duties and showing lack of confidence in … 1994. The order reads as under:- '1. WHEREAS, a Show Cause Notice No. Air HQ/21641/16068/P01(F) dated 12 Feb 93 was served on Sqn.Ldr.A.Gupta (16068) F(P) requiring him to show cause as to why he should not be

Indian Defence Service of Engineers Association (Govt. Approved) Vs. U ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Chief Engineers etc. MES was created exclusively to meet the engineering works requirements of the Army, Navy and Air Force. Later, the notification dated 17.09.1949 was issued to deal exclusively with the civilian component of the MES till … rules- i.e. the Military Engineer Services (Army Personnel), Regulations, 1989 hereafter ("the 1989 Regulations") framed under the Army Act, 1950 and notification bearing no. SRO. 4E dated 09.07.1991 ("the 1991 Rules") framed under proviso to Article 309 of … the petitioners, the 1989 regulations were framed and brought into force under Section 192 of the Army Act. It is submitted that these regulations did

D.P Tripathy Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : MRTP

read and explained the provision of Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 142 of the Air Force Act to the appellant and suggested to him to withdraw his plea of guilty. The court advised the appellant … the authorities were not convinced and court martialled him for the following offences. FIRST CHARGE SECTION 39(b) AF ACT 1950 WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE OVERSTAYING LEAVE GRANTED TO HIM in that he, at No. 77 SU, AF having been

The Maharashtra State Co-operative Agricultural and Rural Development ...

Court : Mumbai Aurangabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … deleted by Mah. 27 of 1969, s. 16(b). (3) Save as otherwise provided under subsection ( 2) to section 93, no Court shall have jurisdiction to entertain any suit or other proceedings in respect of any dispute referred

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

senior officer present at a port or an officer having by virtue of sub-sections (2) and (3V of Section 93 to arrest any offender subject to naval law under warrant. Section 84 of the Navy Act makes provision … Procedure would be applicable in respect of persons proceeded under Court-Martial under the Army Act, Navy Act or Air-Force Act came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of Ajmer Singh v. Union of