Advanced Search Results

Glaxo India Ltd., a Pharmaceutical Company Vs. Mr. C. Gupta and Anothe ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 25; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 23; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92-A; Industrial Employment Standing Order Act, 1946; Factories Act, 1948; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 153; M.P. Industrial Relations Act

Reported in : 1999(2)ALLMR482; 1999(3)BomCR401; (1999)2BOMLR758; [1999(82)FLR389]; (1999)IILLJ718Bom; 1999(2)MhLj410

a consequence of, that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950 or theNavy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police service … employee was part of managerial staff and therefore he would not be a workman as per definition under section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Needless to say, according to the employee, he is a workman … Motor Vehicles Act. No fault liability was introduced by way of section 92-A in the old Act, and the incident had happened prior to the

Avinash Maan Vs. Sanjana Maan

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

volunteered to pay `2,500/- per month instead of making him required to pay under Section 92(i) of the Air Force Act, 1950. The appellant/husband has also placed on record various letters (five) written by him to his wife with proof

Aparna P vs Union of India Represented by Ministry of CIVIL Aviation

Court : Kerala

eighth respondent. The first petitioner raises statutory claim for the wife and children under Section 92(i) of the Air Force Act, 1950. The petitioners have submitted Ext.P1 application before the third respondent - Air Chief Marshal, Chief of Air Staff,

Belapur Co. Ltd. Vs. Maharashtra State Farming Corporation

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Property

Acts : Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 91 to 98; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908

Reported in : AIR1969Bom231; 1970MhLJ330

the Privy Council in the case of Baijnath Singh v. Hajee Valley Mahomed 27 Bom LR 787 = AIR 1925 PC 75 in which the same question as in Balkrishan Das' case arose not, however, in relation … District since the last about 45 years. Prior to the coming into force of the Maharashtra agricultural Lands (Ceiling on Holdings) Act (Maharashtra Act XXVII … the said agreement was related to existing facts as is permitted to be done by proviso (6) to Section 92 of the Evidence Act. In the further alternative, it was contended by Mr. Nariman that if the court

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

custody of an offender until he can be dealt with adequately.21. Regulation 92 of the Regulations, 1965 is significant which reads as follows:'92. Navd Custody--(1)'The … Procedure would be applicable in respect of persons proceeded under Court-Martial under the Army Act, Navy Act or Air-Force Act came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of Ajmer Singh v. Union of … ORDER1. This petition is filed under Sections 437 and 439 of Cr.PC for grant of bail.2. The petitioners are accused 1 to 3 respectively in

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, heirs and successors in so for … considered, and they have been answered in paragraphs 77, 79, 80,81, 82, 92, 93, 94, 97, 98, 100 and 101, which are being extracted below:77. … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the

Sgt. Jeevan Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 20, 22, 24, 73 and 189(2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 15(2), 13 to 18; Constitution of India - Article 20(2)

Reported in : ILR1992KAR1027; 1992(2)KarLJ408

Order under Appeals, had refused to interfere with the orders of discharge of Airmen, who were subject to Air Force Act, 1950 (for short, 'the Act'), we were, to begin with, rather disinclined to entertain these appeals being of the … Venkatachala, J.1. These Writ Appeals, W.A.Nos. 78/92, 141/92 and 152/92, are preferred under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, by the petitioners respectively in Writ Petitions, W.P.Nos. 20048/89, 12320/90

Haji Usman Haji Mohammad Vs. State

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Madhya Bharat Customs Regulation Ordinance, 1948 - Sections 9; Madhya Bharat Customs Regulation Act, 1949 - Sections 9 and 10; Madhya Bharat Ayat Niryat Kar Vidhan, 1949 - Sections 3 and 106; Constitution of India - Articles 19(1), 301, 305, 366 and 372

Reported in : AIR1958MP33; 1958CriLJ181

of the Customs Regulation Ordinance No. 8 of1948, continued to be in force upto the date of the offence i.e. upto 2nd November, 1950; and … contention Mr. Malgawa relied upon the decision of the Supreme Court in Chintamarao v. State of M. P., AIR 1951 SC 118 (A). The learned counsel also relied upon the provisions of Article 301 of the Constitution … his opinion as regards the scope of Article 19(1)(g) as follows :'Article 301 is, if anything, wider than Section 92 inasmuch as it secures freedom of movement not only inter-State but throughout the territory of India. While Article … seed and groundnut seed oil.9. The Ordinance No. 8 was repealed by Act No. 16 (Customs Regulation Act Samvat 2005). The provisions of this Act

Ex. Sq. Leader Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 17

Reported in : 76(1998)DLT554

him to show cause as to why he should not be removed from the service under Section 19, Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 17, Air Force Rules, 1969 for avoiding flying duties and showing lack of confidence in … overcome in 1992 and then I was fit to fly. I requested through an application dated 29 July, 92 addressed to ACC 32 Mg AF my willingness to fly, however no heed was paid and subsequently I

Ex. Sq. Leader Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air force Rules, 1969 - Rule 17

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ652

him to show cause as to why he should not be removed from the service under Section 19, Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 17 Air Force Rules, 1969 for avoiding flying duties and showing lack of confidence in … overcome in 1992 and then I was fit to fly. I requested through an application dt. 29 July 92 addressed to ACC 32 Mg AF my willingness to fly, however no heed was paid and subsequently I