Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Flt. Lt. G.S. Bajwa
Supreme Court of India
May-02-2003
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 7, 41, 41(2), 65, 111 and 125; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 21, 22 and 33; Army Act; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 88, 89, 100, 102, 110, 111 and 125; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
104(2003)DLT618(SC); JT2003(4)SC505; 2003(4)SCALE494; (2003)9SCC630; [2003]3SCR1092; 2003(3)SLJ288(SC); 2003(2)LC849(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1479
Air Force discipline. Accordingly the respondent was charged of offences punishable under Sections 41(2) and 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). According to the respondent the proceedings before the General Court Martial were … prejudicial to the good order and Air Force discipline. Accordingly the respondent was charged of offences punishable under Sections 41(2) and 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). According to the … that this finding is wholly unsustainable. 34. In the first instance Rule 89 of the Rules provides that when a court is once assembled and
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.P.N. Sharma Vs. the Union of India
Delhi
Jan-23-1968
Criminal
Constitution of India; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 161(1)
AIR1968Delhi158; 1968CriLJ1059; ILR1968Delhi263
petition covers a fairly wide field including a declaration that Rules 88, 89 and 112-A of the Air Force Act Rules, 1950, are ultra vires, … foreign power. He was found guilty in respect of three charges under sections 71 and 42 of the Air Force Act, 1950, and was cashiered on 28/11/1963 to serve rigorous imprisonment for fourteen years. The finding and the sentence of … military secrets to nationals of a foreign power. He was found guilty in respect of three charges under sections 71 and 42 of the Air Force Act, 1950, and was cashiered on 28/11/1963 to serve rigorous imprisonment
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSgt. Jeevan Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Karnataka
Mar-04-1992
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 20, 22, 24, 73 and 189(2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 15(2), 13 to 18; Constitution of India - Article 20(2)
ILR1992KAR1027; 1992(2)KarLJ408
Order under Appeals, had refused to interfere with the orders of discharge of Airmen, who were subject to Air Force Act, 1950 (for short, 'the Act'), we were, to begin with, rather disinclined to entertain these appeals being of the … Venkatachala, J.1. These Writ Appeals, W.A.Nos. 78/92, 141/92 and 152/92, are preferred under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, by the petitioners respectively in Writ Petitions, W.P.Nos. 20048/89, 12320/90
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-15-1999
Criminal
Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)
1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421
and also makes provisions for release of such persons. Sub-clause (2) Regulation 89 of Regulations, 1965 reads as follows:'2. If flie Commanding Officer considers the … Procedure would be applicable in respect of persons proceeded under Court-Martial under the Army Act, Navy Act or Air-Force Act came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of Ajmer Singh v. Union of … ORDER1. This petition is filed under Sections 437 and 439 of Cr.PC for grant of bail.2. The petitioners are accused 1 to 3 respectively in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAir Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...
Guwahati
Aug-17-2013
Education
records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … 3. Your kind co-operation in this regard is highly solicited. Thanking you.Yours sincerelySd/-(S Anil Kumar)Wing CommanderAsstt. Provost Marshal.” 89. From a cautious reading of the contents of the above letter, certain indigestible facts emerge on record. With
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskChairman-cum-managing Director, Fertilizer Corporation of India Limite ...
Allahabad
May-26-2005
Labour and Industrial
Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 2(1), 4(1), 7(4), 7(7), 13, 18 and 103; Payment of Gratuity (Central) Rules - Rules 10(2) and 17; Apprentice Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9) and 2(22); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1965; Payment of Wages Act; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952; Air force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 67; Labour Law; Indian Contract Act
2005(2)ESC1547
holds a civil post under the Central Government or a State Government or who is subject to the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957).39. … to a further sum of Rs. 11,987/- towards gratuity, hence each one of them filed an application under Section 7(4) of the Act read with Rule 10(2) of the Rules, before the Controlling Authority/Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central),
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskWg Cdr S. Yadav Vs. Uoi and Others
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi
May-16-2014
Land Acquisition
Matched in: Judge R.C. Mishra, Member &Amp; the Honourable Mr. Air Marshal J.N. Burma, Member
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Corporal Sharma A.K.
Guwahati
Jul-31-1997
Criminal
Indian Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 150, 161, 161(1) and 161(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109 and 325; Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24 and 59
in its support. It is stated that by virtue of the provisions of Section 161 of the Indian Air Force Act, 1950, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1950', an appeal by way of representation was submitted by the petitioner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBasanagouda Vs. The Divisional Controller
Karnataka Dharwad
Apr-25-2024
Labour and Industrial
has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … lost the ticket would also apply to the Corporation, since the - 89 - NC:2024. KHC-D:7636 WP No.100878 of 2017 and Connected matters Corporation could … ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE CLAIM PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, HUBBALLI UNDER SECTION10(4-A) OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, ETC. IN W.P. No.112165/2017: BETWEEN: MARUTIGOUDA, S/O HANUMANTAGOUDA PATIL, AGED ABOUT35YEARS, OCC NIL, R/O
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSri.pundappa S/o Amoghappa Karagar Vs. The North West Karnataka
Karnataka Dharwad
Apr-25-2024
Labour and Industrial
has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … lost the ticket would also apply to the Corporation, since the - 89 - NC:2024. KHC-D:7636 WP No.100878 of 2017 and Connected matters Corporation could … ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW THE CLAIM PETITION FILED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, HUBBALLI UNDER SECTION10(4-A) OF INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, ETC. IN W.P. No.112165/2017: BETWEEN: MARUTIGOUDA, S/O HANUMANTAGOUDA PATIL, AGED ABOUT35YEARS, OCC NIL, R/O
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »