Advanced Search Results

S.P.N. Sharma Vs. the Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 161(1)

Reported in : AIR1968Delhi158; 1968CriLJ1059; ILR1968Delhi263

this petition covers a fairly wide field including a declaration that Rules 88, 89 and 112-A of the Air Force Act Rules, 1950, are ultra … foreign power. He was found guilty in respect of three charges under sections 71 and 42 of the Air Force Act, 1950, and was cashiered on 28/11/1963 to serve rigorous imprisonment for fourteen years. The finding and the sentence of … military secrets to nationals of a foreign power. He was found guilty in respect of three charges under sections 71 and 42 of the Air Force Act, 1950, and was cashiered on 28/11/1963 to serve rigorous imprisonment

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Flt. Lt. G.S. Bajwa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 7, 41, 41(2), 65, 111 and 125; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 21, 22 and 33; Army Act; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 88, 89, 100, 102, 110, 111 and 125; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 104(2003)DLT618(SC); JT2003(4)SC505; 2003(4)SCALE494; (2003)9SCC630; [2003]3SCR1092; 2003(3)SLJ288(SC); 2003(2)LC849(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1479

Air Force discipline. Accordingly the respondent was charged of offences punishable under Sections 41(2) and 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). According to the respondent the proceedings before the General Court Martial were … prejudicial to the good order and Air Force discipline. Accordingly the respondent was charged of offences punishable under Sections 41(2) and 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). According to the … had been arraigned, the court shall, subject to the provisions of Rule 88, continue the trial from day to day unless it appears to the

V.N. Narayanan Nair and ors. Vs. State of Kerala and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Tenancy Laws; Kerala Land Reforms Act, 1964 - Sections 1, 12, 29A, 29B, 30, 30A, 32, 42, 50A(2), 72, 72A, 72F to 72J, 73, 75, 77 to 85, 85(1), 88 and 125; Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1966; Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1967; Kerala Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1969; Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 19, 19(1), 21, 26, 30A, 31, 31B, 31A(1), 31A(2), 31(1), 31(2) and 245; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1971Ker98

part bad in whole, of Romesh Thapper v. State of Madras, AIR 1950 SC 124 is but of rare application. In most cases it would … provisions or provisions in substitution) cannot claim the protection of Article 31-B see Ramanlal v. State of Gujarat, AIR 1969 SC 168 and State of Orissa v. Chandrasekhar Singh Bhoi, 1970-1 SCWR 306 = (AIR 1970 SC … prescribed and upon such surrender or assumption the land shall vest in the Government free from all encumbrances. Section 88 provides that the compensation payable for the land so vested in Government shall be fifty-five per cent of … 1970, no provision of the Act that has not been brought into force.Chapter II (Sections 3 to 80-G) is headed, 'Provisions Regarding Tenancies'. Section 3

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Corporal Sharma A.K.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 150, 161, 161(1) and 161(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109 and 325; Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24 and 59

in its support. It is stated that by virtue of the provisions of Section 161 of the Indian Air Force Act, 1950, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1950', an appeal by way of representation was submitted by the petitioner

Vasanji Kevalbhai and ors. Vs. Dahiben and ors.

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 - Sections 1 to 847; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Amendment) Act, 1952

Reported in : AIR1975Guj25; (1974)GLR780

learned Single Judge has disposed of this question relyin on the decision in s.No. Kamle V. sholapur municipality, Air 1966 SC 538, by the Full Bench of five judges. In that decision their Lordships had considered the … present Act - came into force on December 28, 1948, and originally in view of the exemption under Section 88(1)(c), the provisions of section 1 to 87 became was removed by the Bombay Amendment Act, 33 of 1952,

D.P Tripathy Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : MRTP

read and explained the provision of Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 142 of the Air Force Act to the appellant and suggested to him to withdraw his plea of guilty. The court advised the appellant … the authorities were not convinced and court martialled him for the following offences. FIRST CHARGE SECTION 39(b) AF ACT 1950 WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE OVERSTAYING LEAVE GRANTED TO HIM in that he, at No. 77 SU, AF having been

Ex-signalman Shri Bhagwan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secreta ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(3), 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 to 25 and 27; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 22, 191, 191(2) and 192; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 12, 20, 21, 22, 165, 167, 173, 173A, 183, 185, 187 and 188; defense Service Regulation; Medical Services of the Armed Forces Medical, 1962; General Regulations - Sections 1; Service Pension and Gratuity Regulations - Sections 2 and 3; Disability Pensionary Awards Regulations - Sections 4; Special Pensionary Awards Regulations - Sections 5; Entitlement Rules, 1961 - Rule 7; Army/Air Force Act; Entitlement (Amendment) Rules, 1982; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excises Act, 1944

Reported in : 103(2003)DLT269; 2003(3)SLJ303(Delhi)

rank in the Army are the same for officers in the Army and for all personnel in the Air Force and Navy. thereforee, while the general principles that we have determined can be applied more or less uniformly, … Certain procedures have been laid down in various documents about which very few people seem to be aware.Army Act, 1950 13. Retirement, release or discharge of Army personnel is provided for in Section 22 of the Army Act, … by them about the grant of disability pension helps no one. ' 88. Rules 7 and 8 of the 1982 Entitlement Rules reiterates Rules 2

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … of call record of the mobile phones of not only of the petitioner, but also of Ms. ‘X. 88. The above inference gets strengthened from the fact that on 12.07.2012, respondent No.8 wrote a letter to the

Reptakos Brett and Co. Vs. Labour Court (Vth), U.P., Kanpur and Anothe ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 4K, 6N, 6P and 6Q; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Displine) Act, 1934

Reported in : 1998(4)AWC573; [1999(81)FLR222]

but does not Include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934 ; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as … his services have been Illegally and arbitrarily terminated by the petitioner company and a reference was made under Section 4K of the U. P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) to the Labour

Vishwanath Agarwal Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, Lucknow

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 123, 174, 213 and 245; Uttar Pradesh Sales Tax (Amendment) Ordinance, 1956 - Sections 1

Reported in : AIR1956All557

was satisfied.' 27. Lastly in Lakhi Narayan Das v. Province of Bihar, 1950 FC 59 (AIR V 37) (E), where Section 88(1), Government of India … had received the assent of the President. (2) An Ordinance promulgated under this Article shall have the same force and effect as an Act of the Legislature of the State assented to by the Governor, but every … 1949 Cal 1 (AIR V 36) (FB) (D), with reference to an Ordinance promulgated by the Governor under Section 88(1), Government of India Act which is similar to Article 213 of the Constitution, it was contended that no