Advanced Search Results

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Mr. Gulshan Bajwa

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 13; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 17(5) and 19(3); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 65, 110 and 161(2); Constitution of India - Article 215; Contempt of Courts (Amendment) Act; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT111

the petitioner under arrest; the purported order dated 14.1.1985 passed by the Central Government under Section 161(2) of Air Force Act, 1950; Section 65 & 110 of Air Force Act; the order for arrest of the petitioner during the trial by

Shyam Sunder Vs. Hudibai and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 and 100 - Order 14, Rule 2; Madhya Bharat Zamindari Abolition Act, 1951 - Sections 38; Madhya Bharat Land Revenue and Tenancy Act, 1950 - Sections 86; Court-fees Act, 1870 - Sections 12

Reported in : AIR1989MP316

Piyare v. Sukhlal, 1960 MPLJ 276, it has been held that :'Section 86, M.B. Land Revenue and Tenancy Act, 1950, is comprehensive enough to include every possibility where mutation of names is to be effected consequent upon legal … irreproachable. .....'11. Learned Counsel for the appellant then relied on the case of M. Venkalaratnam v. M. Ramadas, AIR 1971 Andh Pra 281 and submitted that in applying the principles of res judicata it is the competency … 86(4), M.B. Land Revenue and Tenancy Act. Samvat 2007 which came into force on 6-6-52. Order passed in mutation proceedings shall not debar any person

G.B. Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ485

justice and discipline demanded that he should be retried, the retrial had been ordered under the provisions of Air Force Act, 1950 in particular in the light of the provisions of Section 152 of the Act. The petitioner contends that … by a Court martial or by a criminal Court or has been dealt with under Section 82 or Section 86 he shall not be liable to be tried again for the same offence by a Court martial or

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … refer the case to the appropriate superior air force authority for sanction under Section 83 or disposal under Section 86 or, if he thinks it desirable, re-hear the case and dispose it of summarily. 26. When, however, the

John Joseph Khokar Vs. B.S. Bhadange and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 227; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions of Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 ; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 1998(2)BomCR174; 1997(3)MhLj907

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person :-(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or(ii) who is employed in the police service … and that needs consideration is: whether the petitioner John Joseph Khokar is a workman within the meaning of section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.2. The said question arises from the facts which briefly stated are:

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

no such person shall be detained beyond the said period without authority of such commanding or other officer. Section 86 mandates that the charge made against any person subject to naval law taken into custody shall without any … Procedure would be applicable in respect of persons proceeded under Court-Martial under the Army Act, Navy Act or Air-Force Act came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of Ajmer Singh v. Union of

Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(14), 2B, 25B and 25F; Factories Act - Sections 79; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC334(SC); 2008(5)CTC365; [2008(119)FLR398]; [2009(1)JCR86(SC)]; 2008(4)KLT444(SC); (2009)ILLJ602SC; (2009)1MLJ176(SC); (2009)153PLR348; RLW2009(1)SC626; 2008(13)SC

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person -(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Supreme Court in Birdhichand Sharma v. First Civil Judge 1961 II LLJ 86, wherein the Supreme Court in facts and circumstances of the case, found … dated 10th September 1998 held that the claimant before it, was not a workman within the meaning of Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter called the 'Act') as he had worked only as a

Brijesh Narayan Vs. Rajasthan State Co-operative Bank Ltd. and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Rajasthan Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1958 - Sections 3

Reported in : RLW2006(1)Raj210

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person--(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … iq= fxj/kjukjk;.k dks izcU/kd laPkkyd] jkt- LVsV dkWijsfVo cSad fy- iks- ckWDl 86] usg: cktkj] t;iqj ,oa 'kk[kk izcU/kd] jkt- LVsV dkWijsfVo cSad fy- fla/kh … assigning any reason. The petitioner alleged that his termination from service w.e.f. 23.11.1992 is retrenchment as defined under Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act of 1947') and the same

Lt. Col. J.S. Oberoi Vs. Technology Parks Ltd. and Others

Court : Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

period the Residential Accommodation available at Noida especially in the Colonies being set up by the Army/Navy and Air Force could be used by the entrepreneurs. Thus, this letter shows that the Uttar Pradesh Government agreed to the … of land and also to grant permission u/Section 154(2) of the Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, 1950. The conditions which were to be imposed under Section 154(2) have already been noticed above while narrating the

Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele Vs. Divisional Controller

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 2(14), 3, 3(5), 10(2), 28 and 44; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25B, 25F and 25G; Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rule 81; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 - Sections 2; Contract Labour Act; Labour and Industrial Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 15(3), 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 46, 47 and 227

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR80; 2007(5)BomCR177

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … treated as the one under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.FACTS3. The petitioner filed a complaint under Section 28 read with item (1) of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of