Advanced Search Results

Shyamabai Wd/O Surajkaran Joshi and ors. Vs. Madan Mohan Mandir Sansth ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 1, 19, 20, 47, 48 and 83; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 2(13) and 2(20); Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 6; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 19(1) and 129; Transfer of Property Act; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Bombay Public Trusts Rules, 1951 - Rule 8; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR294

Gujarat High Court in Atmaram Ranchhodbhai v. Gulamhusein Gulam Mohiyaddin and Anr. AIR 1973 Guj 113 is also not a good law on the subject … of Sarda Education Trust (cited supra) was holding field and was in force, there was no occasion for making a reference to the larger Bench … public trust on the strength of definition of Public Trust under Section 2(13) of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 ?Similarly, Justice C.L. Pangarkar, in view of conflicting decisions, also referred following issues to the larger Bench for … Trusts Act, 1882, applies to the present case. The Courts below have argued themselves into an application of Section 83 of the Trusts Act. Sri Dixit rightly objects to this course because that Act relates only to private

S.p. Pandey Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

the appellant for the above alleged misconduct on the technical ground that sanction under Section 83 of the Air Force Act, 1950 was not obtained. 2.4 The appellant preferred a statutory complaint dated 24.05.2010. This led to a formal investigation

R.P. Dubey Vs. Chief of Air Staff and Others

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

that the “Severe Reprimand”, which was awarded to the petitioner by his Station Commander under Section 82 of Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act.) for a civil offence could not have been tried for without taking … a civil offence could not have been tried for without taking prior sanction of AOC-in-C in terms of Section 83 of the Act, which was never taken in the case of the petitioner.4. We have heard the learned

P.R. Francis Vs. Raghavan Pozhakadavil and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Election

Acts : Representaion of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 62(1), 83(1), 100(1), 123 and 123(2); Election Law; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) ; Conduct of Election Rules, 1961 - Rule 94A; Kerala High Court Rules - Rule 76

Reported in : AIR1981Ker64

one 'subject to any of the disqualifications referred to in Section 16 of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (hereinafter, the 1950 Act) he would not be entitled to vote. Section 16 of the 1950 Act speaks … on the scene; those who believe in God and democracy on the one hand and atheistic and anti-religious forces not having faith in democracy on the other. In this fight between these two alignments, don't create such … do not set forth the full particulars thereof as required by Section 83(1)(b) of the Act. The petitioner has adduced some oral evidence to prove

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … case summarily or (b) he may refer the case to the superior air force authority for sanction under Section 83 or (c) adjourn the case for the purpose of having the ‘evidence reduced to writing. 25. When the

N.F. Chand Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1987CriLJ637

in which the offence of murder is committed against a person not subject to the military, naval or air force or offence of a culpable homicide not amounting to murder j or rape in relation to such a … No. 2 is Retired Lt. General Jagdishwar Singh Nakal. The petitioner is a person subject to (The) Army Act, 1950. There is no dispute about it. In Section 3(b)(ii) 'Civil offence' has been defined as an offence which

Chief of Army Staff and ors. Vs. Major Dharam Pal Kukrety

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14(2) and 71; Army Act - Sections 121, 153 and 160

Reported in : AIR1985SC703; 1985CriLJ913; 1986LabIC41; (1985)IILLJ165SC; 1985(1)SCALE582; (1985)2SCC412; [1985]3SCR415; 1985(17)LC863(SC)

G.B. Singh v. Union of India and Ors. [1973] Crl. L.J. 485. That was a case under the Air Force Act, 1950 (Act No. 45 of 1950). In that case, the officer was found guilty by a general court-martial and … court, or has been dealt with under any of the Sections 80, 83, 84 and 85, he shall not be liable to be tried again … and the Army Rules to which we now turn.8. Chapter IV of the Army Act, which consists of Section 18 to 24, deals with the conditions of service of persons appointed under the Act. Section 18 provides

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

'Arrest' makes provisions on various aspects of arrest, detention and custody of the offenders covered by tlie Act. Section 83 of the Navy Act provides for Power of Chief of Naval Staff, every officer in command of a … Procedure would be applicable in respect of persons proceeded under Court-Martial under the Army Act, Navy Act or Air-Force Act came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of Ajmer Singh v. Union of

Chairman-cum-managing Director, Fertilizer Corporation of India Limite ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 2(1), 4(1), 7(4), 7(7), 13, 18 and 103; Payment of Gratuity (Central) Rules - Rules 10(2) and 17; Apprentice Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9) and 2(22); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1965; Payment of Wages Act; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952; Air force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 67; Labour Law; Indian Contract Act

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1547

holds a civil post under the Central Government or a State Government or who is subject to the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957).39. … to a further sum of Rs. 11,987/- towards gratuity, hence each one of them filed an application under Section 7(4) of the Act read with Rule 10(2) of the Rules, before the Controlling Authority/Assistant Labour Commissioner (Central),

Dinesh Pal vs.gnct of Delhi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950 ), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950 ), or the Navy Act, 1957 … award dated, 19th February, 2018, passed by the Labour Court, on an application filed by the petitioner under Section 37-C (ii) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”). The petitioner had,