Advanced Search Results
Sugreev Singh Desuriya Vs. Central Government of India and ors.
Allahabad
Apr-03-2002
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 73 and 82; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 15
2002(2)AWC1442
or under Section 82 against the appellant-writ petitioner. If it has been proceeded under Section 82 of the Air Force Act, 1950. it cannot be said that the minor punishment awarded to the appellant-writ petitioner is without jurisdiction.17. In view
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAir Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...
Guwahati
Aug-17-2013
Education
records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … to be inflicted in pursuance of the sentence awarded by a court-martial, or by an officer exercising under section 82 but shall not inflict any punishment on his own authority: Provided that no officer shall be so arrested
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskR.P. Dubey Vs. Chief of Air Staff and Others
Delhi
Nov-10-2014
Education
that the “Severe Reprimand”, which was awarded to the petitioner by his Station Commander under Section 82 of Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act.) for a civil offence could not have been tried for without taking
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
G.B. Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Allahabad
Oct-06-1972
Criminal
1973CriLJ485
justice and discipline demanded that he should be retried, the retrial had been ordered under the provisions of Air Force Act, 1950 in particular in the light of the provisions of Section 152 of the Act. The petitioner contends that … of an offence by a Court martial or by a criminal Court or has been dealt with under Section 82 or Section 86 he shall not be liable to be tried again for the same offence by a
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-21-2000
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984
95(2002)DLT770
Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … but he was never produced. The trial was adjourned sine die which was in violation of Army Rule 82(3) and Army Act 117(3). The order adjourning the Court sine die was passed by the General Officer Commanding,
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHamdan Vs. Rumsfeld
US Supreme Court
Jun-29-2006
MRTP
consisted of “disinterested civilian judges,” and concluding that there was no reason for the Court to address an Air Force Captain’s argument that he was entitled to remain free from confinement pending appeal of his conviction by court-martial … the Articles of War were codified and re-enacted as the UCMJ in 1950, Congress determined to retain Article 15 because it had been “construed by … and mandamus petitions, Hamdan asserted that the military commission lacks authority to try him because (1) neither congressional Act nor the common law of war supports trial by this commission for conspiracy, an offense that, Hamdan says, … habeas corpus filed by … an alien detained … at Guantanamo Bay.” Section 1005(h)(2) provides that §§1005(e)(2) and (3)-which give the D. C. Circuit “exclusive” … Military Justice, 10 U. S. C. §§836 and 821, and the Geneva Conventions, concluded that there is
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskK. Komaraiah Vs. Industrial Tribunal-cum-additional Labour Court, Hyde ...
Andhra Pradesh
Jul-12-2000
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2-A, 11-A, 18(1) and 25-FFF & O, 25(H)(2); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957
2000(5)ALD298; 2000(4)ALT441; [2000(87)FLR357]
has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … petitions, except Writ Petition No.7514 of 2000, arising out of ID Nos.l, 82, 81, 77, 137, 103, 4, 80, 79, 78, 76, 75, 5, 10, … In connection with the reopening of the establishment, the 2nd respondent entered into settlement under sub-section (1) of Section 18 of the Act benefiting only those employees who were on its permanent roll and accordingly such employees
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNand Ram Chhotey Lal Vs. Kishori Raman Singh and anr.
Allahabad
Dec-26-1961
PropertyCivil
Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(2), 14, 19(1), 31, 31(1), 31A, 245 and 246; Constitution of India (IVth Amendment) Act, 1955; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Debt Reduction Act, 1953 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(3), 7, 8 and 9; Debt Law
AIR1962All521
are relevant for our purpose, read as follows:- '13 (1)--All laws in force in the territoryof India immediately before the commencement ofthis Constitution, in so … of Zamindars whose estates have been acquired under the provisions of U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act 1950; It is hereby enacted as follows:' The statement of objects and reasons was: 'The Zarnindari Abolition Committee made … proceed to distribute the amount due on the two properties separately in accordance with the principles contained in Section 82 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, as if they had been properties belonging separately to two persons … latest case is of Deep Chand v. State of U. P. : AIR1959SC648 . In Saghir Ah-mad's case : [1955]1SCR707 , the constitutionality of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Corporal Sharma A.K.
Guwahati
Jul-31-1997
Criminal
Indian Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 150, 161, 161(1) and 161(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109 and 325; Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24 and 59
in its support. It is stated that by virtue of the provisions of Section 161 of the Indian Air Force Act, 1950, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1950', an appeal by way of representation was submitted by the petitioner
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinesh Kumar Mehta S/O Shiv NaraIn Mehta Vs. Presiding Officer Labour ...
Allahabad
Nov-29-2004
Labour and Industrial
Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 6I, 6N, 6P, 6Q and 33C(2); Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 - Sections 2; Air force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) (Amendment) Act, 1986
2005(1)ESC680; [2005(104)FLR338]
retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person.(i) who is subject to the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … He pleaded that his termination was illegal, null and void as it was brought about in violation of Sections6-I, 6-N, 6-P and-6-Q of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.3. The employers took a stand before the Labour
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »