Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 82 · Page 1 of about 491 results (0.079 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Apr 03 2002

Sugreev Singh Desuriya Vs. Central Government of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-03-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 73 and 82; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 15

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1442

or under Section 82 against the appellant-writ petitioner. If it has been proceeded under Section 82 of the Air Force Act, 1950. it cannot be said that the minor punishment awarded to the appellant-writ petitioner is without jurisdiction.17. In view

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2013

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-17-2013

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … to be inflicted in pursuance of the sentence awarded by a court-martial, or by an officer exercising under section 82 but shall not inflict any punishment on his own authority: Provided that no officer shall be so arrested

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 10 2014

R.P. Dubey Vs. Chief of Air Staff and Others

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-10-2014

Subject : Education

that the “Severe Reprimand”, which was awarded to the petitioner by his Station Commander under Section 82 of Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the Act.) for a civil offence could not have been tried for without taking

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 06 1972

G.B. Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-06-1972

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1973CriLJ485

justice and discipline demanded that he should be retried, the retrial had been ordered under the provisions of Air Force Act, 1950 in particular in the light of the provisions of Section 152 of the Act. The petitioner contends that … of an offence by a Court martial or by a criminal Court or has been dealt with under Section 82 or Section 86 he shall not be liable to be tried again for the same offence by a

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2000

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … but he was never produced. The trial was adjourned sine die which was in violation of Army Rule 82(3) and Army Act 117(3). The order adjourning the Court sine die was passed by the General Officer Commanding,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 29 2006

Hamdan Vs. Rumsfeld

Court : US Supreme Court

Decided on : Jun-29-2006

Subject : MRTP

consisted of “disinterested civilian judges,” and concluding that there was no reason for the Court to address an Air Force Captain’s argument that he was entitled to remain free from confinement pending appeal of his conviction by court-martial … the Articles of War were codified and re-enacted as the UCMJ in 1950, Congress determined to retain Article 15 because it had been “construed by … and mandamus petitions, Hamdan asserted that the military commission lacks authority to try him because (1) neither congressional Act nor the common law of war supports trial by this commission for conspiracy, an offense that, Hamdan says, … habeas corpus filed by … an alien detained … at Guantanamo Bay.” Section 1005(h)(2) provides that §§1005(e)(2) and (3)-which give the D. C. Circuit “exclusive” … Military Justice, 10 U. S. C. §§836 and 821, and the Geneva Conventions, concluded that there is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2000

K. Komaraiah Vs. Industrial Tribunal-cum-additional Labour Court, Hyde ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-12-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2-A, 11-A, 18(1) and 25-FFF & O, 25(H)(2); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD298; 2000(4)ALT441; [2000(87)FLR357]

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … petitions, except Writ Petition No.7514 of 2000, arising out of ID Nos.l, 82, 81, 77, 137, 103, 4, 80, 79, 78, 76, 75, 5, 10, … In connection with the reopening of the establishment, the 2nd respondent entered into settlement under sub-section (1) of Section 18 of the Act benefiting only those employees who were on its permanent roll and accordingly such employees

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 26 1961

Nand Ram Chhotey Lal Vs. Kishori Raman Singh and anr.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Dec-26-1961

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 13(2), 14, 19(1), 31, 31(1), 31A, 245 and 246; Constitution of India (IVth Amendment) Act, 1955; Uttar Pradesh Zamindari Debt Reduction Act, 1953 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 4(3), 7, 8 and 9; Debt Law

Reported in : AIR1962All521

are relevant for our purpose, read as follows:- '13 (1)--All laws in force in the territoryof India immediately before the commencement ofthis Constitution, in so … of Zamindars whose estates have been acquired under the provisions of U. P. Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act 1950; It is hereby enacted as follows:' The statement of objects and reasons was: 'The Zarnindari Abolition Committee made … proceed to distribute the amount due on the two properties separately in accordance with the principles contained in Section 82 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882, as if they had been properties belonging separately to two persons … latest case is of Deep Chand v. State of U. P. : AIR1959SC648 . In Saghir Ah-mad's case : [1955]1SCR707 , the constitutionality of the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 1997

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Corporal Sharma A.K.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-31-1997

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 150, 161, 161(1) and 161(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109 and 325; Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24 and 59

in its support. It is stated that by virtue of the provisions of Section 161 of the Indian Air Force Act, 1950, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1950', an appeal by way of representation was submitted by the petitioner

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 29 2004

Vinesh Kumar Mehta S/O Shiv NaraIn Mehta Vs. Presiding Officer Labour ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Nov-29-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 6I, 6N, 6P, 6Q and 33C(2); Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 - Sections 2; Air force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) (Amendment) Act, 1986

Reported in : 2005(1)ESC680; [2005(104)FLR338]

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person.(i) who is subject to the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … He pleaded that his termination was illegal, null and void as it was brought about in violation of Sections6-I, 6-N, 6-P and-6-Q of the U.P. Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.3. The employers took a stand before the Labour

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial