Advanced Search Results

Gajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 47, 47(1), 80, 81 and 141(2); Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 323 and 452; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 41, 41(1) and 42; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 192, 439 and 475; Criminal Courts and Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 and 4; Constitution of India; Air Force Law

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3347; 1995(3)WLC635; 1995(2)WLN31

may make rules, consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957, and the Air Force Act, 1950, and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time being in force, … July, 1994, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur, whereby he allowed the application dated 23-5-1994 filed under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') by the D. I. G., B. S.

S. Venkataraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Chief of the Air Staf ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC594

service, which is being challenged in this writ petition. The petitioner submitted representation under Section 26 of The Air Force Act, 1950, to the 3rd respondent through proper channel.4. The Airmen are assessed annually for true proficiency and character. In

Jeewanpuri Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1973(6)WLN194

Service Estimates and not subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Indian Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934 and the Air Force Act, 1950. Such a person has to be in whole time employment of the Government of India under the Ministry … punishment of removal and dismissal from service on the charges framed against him.3. After serving a notice under Section 80 CPC. to the Union Government, on 10-12-61 the plaintiff brought the suit in the court of Munsiff, Jodhpur.

R. Suresh Babu Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

sent the petitioner to CH, AF, Bangalore in February 1996 which is gross violation of Section 47 of Air Force Act, 1950. 2(c)The petitioner got discharged from hospital as a normal case having no abnormality found, routed back to MTTI,

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … the petitioner was posted to his own Unit, 7 Jat Regiment, to Naushera (J & K State) HQ 80 Infantry Brigade from Samba where he was working. On 27.10.1978 the petitioner was arrested at Naushera without disclosing

Charu K. Mehta and Others Vs. Lilavati Kirtilal Mehta Medical Trust an ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Education

thereof; (II) Whether this Court lacks inherent jurisdiction to entertain and try this Originating Summons in view of Section 80 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950; (III) Whether the Originating Summons is not maintainable as the Plaintiff … Division Bench of the Delhi High Court in Shanti Devi vs. State AIR 1982 Del.453)Leach CJ speaking for a Division Bench of the Madras High … nothing herein contained shall affect the validity of any such rules in force at the commencement of this Code.” Section 129 begins with a non-obstante … before the Charity Commissioner for the registration of the Trust under Section 18 of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950. The Assistant Charity Commissioner conducted an enquiry under Section 19 and directed the registration of the Trust on

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … the APM Unit, at Air Force Station, Chabua, with Ms. ‘X, Mr. Subramanium had no reply to offer. 80. In the facts and circumstances, as mentioned hereinabove, one cannot, but hold that the petitioner has considerable force,

G.S. Bajwa Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950; Air Force Rules - Rule 102

Reported in : 59(1995)DLT742

good order and Air Force discipline, and thereby committing offences punishable under Section 41(2) and Section 65 of Air Force Act. 1950. The said General Court Martial was conducted illegally and improperly. In proceeding of the said General Court Martial … further claim that in the said Transport Contract some malpractice was being played and Rs. 700 to Rs. 800 were being paid in excess for each trip. thereforee, he made a complaint regarding the same and because

Sgt. Indera Bahadur Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Law

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ374

Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India.32. Mr. Narender Kaushik referred to Section 2 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Section 2 reads as under: -'Persons subject to this Act-The following persons shall be subject to this Act wherever

Joginder Singh Vs. State

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rule 3; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 5(1969)DLT1

Code and the Army Act, the Naval Discipline Act and the Indian Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934, and the Air Force Act and any similar law for the time being in force as to the cases in which persons subject … in which the accused person is serving, and except in cases falling under Sec. 69 of the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) in which death has resulted, the Officer Commanding the brigade or sub-area or station in … a court-martial 'under this Act or punished under any of the sections 80, 83, 84, or 85 is afterwards tried and convicted by a criminal … the Criminal Courts and Court-Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 framed under section 549 (1), Cr.P. C. (hereafter called the Rules) goes to the roto