Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 79 · Page 1 of about 482 results (0.065 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Sep 01 2008

Ex. Wing Commander V. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-01-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 124; Custom Rules; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 79; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Air Force Regulations, 1961; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 16, 16(2), 16(3), 16(5) and 17; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT210

7/79.6. However, a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner dated 24.4.1990 under Section 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1999

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-1999

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act is a complete code by itself … and to correct any other error or collect any amount that may have been omitted to be charged. Section 79 of the Act contemplates that the railway administration may, on the request made by the consignee or endorsee,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 2008

Div. Manager, New India Assurance Co. Ltd. Vs. A. Sankaralingam

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-03-2008

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(14), 2B, 25B and 25F; Factories Act - Sections 79; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2009(1)AWC334(SC); 2008(5)CTC365; [2008(119)FLR398]; [2009(1)JCR86(SC)]; 2008(4)KLT444(SC); (2009)ILLJ602SC; (2009)1MLJ176(SC); (2009)153PLR348; RLW2009(1)SC626; 2008(13)SC

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person -(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … this connection referred us Shankar Balaji Waje v. State of Maharashtra : (1962)ILLJ119SC in which the scope of Section 79 of the Factories Act was under consideration to plead that as this provision was analogous to Section 25B

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 21 2000

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … Weir. Capt. A.K. Rana has now following to state.I was posted to 7 Jat Battalion since 23 March, 79 Presently I am Delhi. I was posted to 527 Int. and F.S. Coy From my B.7 Jat and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 03 1995

G.S. Bajwa Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-03-1995

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950; Air Force Rules - Rule 102

Reported in : 59(1995)DLT742

good order and Air Force discipline, and thereby committing offences punishable under Section 41(2) and Section 65 of Air Force Act. 1950. The said General Court Martial was conducted illegally and improperly. In proceeding of the said General Court Martial

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2003

S. Venkataraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Chief of the Air Staf ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-30-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC594

service, which is being challenged in this writ petition. The petitioner submitted representation under Section 26 of The Air Force Act, 1950, to the 3rd respondent through proper channel.4. The Airmen are assessed annually for true proficiency and character. In

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1998

Sgt. Indera Bahadur Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-26-1998

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Law

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ374

Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India.32. Mr. Narender Kaushik referred to Section 2 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Section 2 reads as under: -'Persons subject to this Act-The following persons shall be subject to this Act wherever

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2013

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-17-2013

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … was in violation of the provisions of Rule 156 (2) of the Air Force Rules,1969, and also Regulation 790 of the Defence Service Regulations (Air Force) apart from being in violation of the Memorandum, dated 22.11.1992, issued

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 11 1976

Hari Shankar JaIn and anr. Vs. Executive Engineer, Rural Electrificati ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Oct-11-1976

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1977)IILLJ429All

implied, but does not include any such person-(i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer … be operative on the purchase of the undertaking by the Board or on the framing of regulations under Section 79(e) of the Electricity (Supply) Act 1948?3. Whether Section 13B of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, applies

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1999

Air Marshal Amarjeet Singh Sethi Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-11-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 7(2), 58(1) and 191

Reported in : 1999(3)KarLJ336

the reason the same is not published in the Official Gazette as required under Section 191 of the Air Force Act, 1950, which governs the service conditions of the petitioner. Therefore, a request is made to declare that the impugned … with his second writ petition inter alia seeking a declaration, to declare that the policy letter No. 7(1) 79(D) AIR III Volume II, dated 30-8-1986 has no statutory force and the same is arbitrary and unreasonable or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial