Advanced Search Results

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act is a complete code by itself … recover the cost of such unloading and any charge for the detention of any wagon on this account.11. Section 78 of the Act empowers the Railway administration to measure and weight. It contemplates that notwithstanding anything contained in

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … From my B.7 Jat and reported to the Unit on 10 December, 75 and stayed until 23 March, 78. On 12 Jan. 75 I had taken over from Capt. R.S. Rathaur as Int. Officer in charge of

P.P. Prasad Vs. Lt. Commander and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Navy Act, 1957 - Section 78; ;Army Act, 1950; ;Air Force Act, 1950; ;Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 190, 200 to 204, 323, 342, 397, 401, 448, 475 and 482; ;Constitution of India - Article 227

Reported in : 1999CriLJ243

may make rules, consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957, and the Air Force Act, 1950, and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union for the time being in force, … getting transfer of the case in terms of Section 475 of the Code of Criminal Procedure read with Section 78 of the Indian Navy Act, 1957 before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate First Class (II) at Port Blair,

Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3070

Code and, the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time … Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and the Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction)

K.C. Gajapati Narayana Deo and ors. Vs. the State of Orissa

Court : Orissa

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 31, 31(2), 31(4), 31A, 31B, 200, 201 and 246; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 299(2); Orissa Estates Abolition Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 2, 5, 6, 26(1), 27(1), 37 and 38; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 35, 78 and 78(2); Tenancy Law; Madras Estates Land Act, 1908 - Sections 3(2), 3(10), 3(16), 168A and 177(2); Orissa Agricultural Income-tax (Second Amendment) Act, 1950 - Sections 1

Reported in : AIR1953Ori185

by the judgment in --'Shankari Prasad Singh v. The Union of India', AIR 1951 S. C. 458(A). In the light of this judgment, the main … for eliminating intermediaries even before the new Constitution of India came into force. Schedule 9 of the Constitution, which has been added by a later … the Act as a whole came under challenge. There were also certain special arguments relating to Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1950 & to the Madras Estates Land (Orissa) Amendment Act of 1947, which is applicable to some only of … and Uttar Pradesh. Section 12-A, Madras Estates Abolition Act, 26 of 1948, Section 6, Bihar Act, 30 of 1950, Section 4(2) Madhya Pradesh Act 1 of 1951, and some of the detailed provisions contained in Section 10 and … the argument in Lefroy on Canadian Constitution, pp. 78, 79, and 80). In the next case decided

Sgt. Jeevan Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 20, 22, 24, 73 and 189(2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 15(2), 13 to 18; Constitution of India - Article 20(2)

Reported in : ILR1992KAR1027; 1992(2)KarLJ408

Order under Appeals, had refused to interfere with the orders of discharge of Airmen, who were subject to Air Force Act, 1950 (for short, 'the Act'), we were, to begin with, rather disinclined to entertain these appeals being of the … Venkatachala, J.1. These Writ Appeals, W.A.Nos. 78/92, 141/92 and 152/92, are preferred under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, by the petitioners respectively in Writ Petitions, W.P.Nos. 20048/89, 12320/90

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … Jaipur in July, 2012, and, within a week, thereafter, a Court of Inquiry was convened by respondent No.4. 78. Justifying the preliminary investigation, which had been directed against the petitioner, the respondents contend that even before the

Keshariprasad S/O Sadhuram Tiwari Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 28(1); Bombay Industrial Relations Act, 1946 - Sections 3(13) and 42(4)

Reported in : 1987(3)BomCR74

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person---(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … considering all the provisions of the Act, it was held that the Labour Court cannot exercise jurisdiction under section 78(1)-D in a case where the employee of an industry governed by the Act has not complied with the

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

punishable with death or with imprisonment for life shall be punished with the punishment assigned for that offence. Section 78 of the Act provides that every person subject to Naval Law who is charged with a civil offence … Procedure would be applicable in respect of persons proceeded under Court-Martial under the Army Act, Navy Act or Air-Force Act came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of Ajmer Singh v. Union of

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

employee of Indian Air Force, who has been found guilty of the offence under Section 39(a) of The Air Force Act, 1950 (for brevity “the Act”) and has been awarded sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months along with