Advanced Search Results

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … 3 December, 1977 or some times prior to it. The portion pertaining to espionage activities described during Nov. 77 as given in my statement is totally false, baseless, concocted and fabricated fairly tale. There is no truth,

Union of India and ors. Vs. Himmat Singh Chahar

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 77(2) and 163(1); Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR1999SC1980; 1999(1)ALD(Cri)913; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)261; 1999CriLJ2894; 1999(3)Crimes60(SC); 1999(2)CTC503; JT1999(3)SC631; 1999(3)SCALE620; (1999)4SCC521; [1999]3SCR513; 199

are dealt with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act or the Navy Act or the Air Force Act and not by the normal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act is a complete code by itself and … said order in the Court Martial Proceeding. In the Court-martial the respondent was found guilty of offence under Section 354 and was sentenced to imprisonment for 9 months, and his services were terminated. Facts culminating in the … of the charge under Section 354 of Indian Penal Code and Section 77(2) of the Navy Act, 1957 (hereinafter referred to as 'an Act') and

Major E.G. Barsay Vs. the State of Bombay

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Prevention of Corruption Act - Sections 5(1); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 34, 120-B, 381 and 411; The Army Act, 1950 - Sections 52, 69, 125 and 126

Reported in : AIR1961SC1762; 1961CriLJ828; [1962]2SCR195

to this Act who commits an offence of murder against a person not subject to military, naval or air force law, or of culpable homicide not amounting to murder against such a person or of rape in relation … Act. 18. The argument of learned counsel for the appellant may be briefly stated thus : The Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) created new offences. Section 52 of the said Act created offences with which accused in … in his own right. In this context, an argument based upon Art. 77 of the Constitution may be noticed. Under clause (1) of Art. 77,

Holy Family English Medium L.P. School and Others Vs. Employees State ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … have validly challenged the same before the said Court invoking the power and procedure under Section 75, r/w Section 77 of the Act or under any other provision. Appeal is a continuation of the original proceedings and as

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … hunted and punished, no matter whether the allegations made against respondent Nos.5 and 6 were true or false. 77. Situated thus, one cannot ignore the petitioners contention that the origin of the Court of Inquiry lies in

D.P Tripathy Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : MRTP

read and explained the provision of Section 84 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 142 of the Air Force Act to the appellant and suggested to him to withdraw his plea of guilty. The court advised the appellant … the authorities were not convinced and court martialled him for the following offences. FIRST CHARGE SECTION 39(b) AF ACT 1950 WITHOUT SUFFICIENT CAUSE OVERSTAYING LEAVE GRANTED TO HIM in that he, at No. 77 SU, AF having been

Glaxo India Ltd., a Pharmaceutical Company Vs. Mr. C. Gupta and Anothe ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 25; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 23; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92-A; Industrial Employment Standing Order Act, 1946; Factories Act, 1948; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 153; M.P. Industrial Relations Act

Reported in : 1999(2)ALLMR482; 1999(3)BomCR401; (1999)2BOMLR758; [1999(82)FLR389]; (1999)IILLJ718Bom; 1999(2)MhLj410

a consequence of, that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950 or theNavy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police service … the Apex Court. The order of the Supreme Court is at page 77 of the employee's petition. While rejecting the SLP, observations were made in … employee was part of managerial staff and therefore he would not be a workman as per definition under section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Needless to say, according to the employee, he is a workman

Wg Cdr S. Yadav Vs. Uoi and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

Matched in: Judge R.C. Mishra, Member &Amp; the Honourable Mr. Air Marshal J.N. Burma, Member

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

3(3) of the Navy Act inasmuch as these offences are triable by a Court of ordinary criminal jurisdiction. Section 77 of the Navy Act contemplates that every person subject to Naval Law who commits a civil offence punishable … Procedure would be applicable in respect of persons proceeded under Court-Martial under the Army Act, Navy Act or Air-Force Act came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of Ajmer Singh v. Union of

K. Komaraiah Vs. Industrial Tribunal-cum-additional Labour Court, Hyde ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2-A, 11-A, 18(1) and 25-FFF & O, 25(H)(2); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD298; 2000(4)ALT441; [2000(87)FLR357]

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Writ Petition No.7514 of 2000, arising out of ID Nos.l, 82, 81, 77, 137, 103, 4, 80, 79, 78, 76, 75, 5, 10, 89, 87, … In connection with the reopening of the establishment, the 2nd respondent entered into settlement under sub-section (1) of Section 18 of the Act benefiting only those employees who were on its permanent roll and accordingly such employees