Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 76 · Page 1 of about 551 results (0.101 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Dec 05 1980

Chandan Mal Vs. Mst. Gulabi

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-05-1980

Subject : Property

Reported in : 1980WLN666

Ratan Bai and Ors. AIR 1972 SC 63 this contention has no force, and the law laid down to the contrary in the aforesaid authorities … 38, in support of his submission that the protection of the Rajasthan Premises (Control) of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 is available to a tenant of the mortgagee. But, it will suffice to say that in view of … In Bhanshali Kushalchand Ramji and Anr. v. Shah Jivraj and Ors. : AIR1958Bom53 the aforesaid ruling of the Supreme Court was relied upon. It was … it stood prior to amendment of 1976, had any right to the present possession of the property. Under Section 76(a) of the Transfer of Property Act, during the continuance of the mortgage property, he has to manage the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 28 1984

Devkinandan and anr. Etc. Vs. Roshan Lal and ors. Etc.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Aug-28-1984

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 13; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 76

Reported in : AIR1985Raj11; 1984()WLN647

(AIR 1966 Raj 19) and Sachal Mal Parasram v. Mst. Ratan Bai AIR 1972 SC 637. His Lordship felt that the definition of 'landlord' contained … position thus is clear that as soon as the Act came into force the respondents acquired khatedari rights under Section 15 and could not therefore … mortgagee is entitled to the protection of the provisions of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 against the mortgagor after the redemption of the mortgage?'In the said order of reference Mr. Justice Agrawal referred … of his family up to his death.' At this stage it is convenient for us to refer to Section 76 of the Transfer of Property Act, which is in the following terms :'76. Liabilities of mortgagees in possession.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2000

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … as the order was illegal one and the appellant also pointed out that late Hav. was attached to 76 Medium Regimental Centre.11. Sometimes later. Col. B.K. Bhandari of Directorate of Military Intelligence came to pressurise the appellant

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 17 2013

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-17-2013

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … but regard such unexplained act as an act of arbitrariness and reflective of bias, prejudice and mala fide. 76. While respondent Nos. 4 and 5 have been treated with favour as can be clearly noticed, the complaint

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 25 2008

Shri Tukaram S. Dighole Vs. Shri Manikrao Shivaji Kokate

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jan-25-2008

Subject : Election

Acts : Representation of the People Act, 1950 - Sections 21, 22, 23, 86, 123(3), 123(4) and 169; Evidence Act - Sections 76; Conduct of Election Rules - Rule 93(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Order 8, Rule 5; Representation of People Act 1951 - Sections 100(1)

Reported in : 2008(2)ALLMR370; 2008(3)BomCR141; 2008(2)MhLj281

Barrackpore v. Satish Chandra Sen ; Chandulal v. Pushkar Raj and Ors. AIR 1952 NAG 271; Dalim Kumar Sain and Ors. v. Smt.Nandarani Dassi and … out by the respondent when the model code of conduct was in force. A copy of this representation has also been annexed to the petition. … election of the respondent be declared void under Section 100(1)(b), 100(1)(d)(ii), 100(d)(iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1950 (for short, hereinafter referred to as the Act).2. The petitioner has alleged that the returned candidate had flagrantly … 13.5 for the Conduct of Elections indicates that in pursuance of rule 93(2) framed under the Act r/w Section 76 of the Indian Evidence Act, the election commission has directed that a VHS cassette recording of speeches may

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 22 1980

S.V. Venkatarama Reddiar Vs. Abdul Ghani Rowther and ors.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-22-1980

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Tamil Nadu Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1960 - Sections 10; Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 76; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : AIR1980Mad276

expression 'mortgagee in possession' includes a tenant from such a mortgagee any force, A mortgagee in possession is excluded from the class of deemed tenants … was assessed at an annual rent of Rs. 10,800, for the years 1950 - 55 and a tenant willing to pay a better rent could … Bench of this Court, to which one of us was a party, in Chandrasekaran v. Kunju Vanniar, : AIR1975Mad227 (FB) and the decision of the Supreme Court in Ponniah v. Perumal, : [1977]2SCR446 , the question which … benefits of the Act inasmuch as the tenancy created by the first defendant, the mortgagee, was referable to Section 76(a) of the Transfer of property Act, and in such circumstances, the tenancy did not come to a close

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 05 1980

Champa Lal Vs. Mst. Gulabi and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Dec-05-1980

Subject : Property

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 111; Protection of Rent Control Act; Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent & Eviction) Act, 1950 - Sections 14

Reported in : AIR1981Raj130

v. Mst. Ratan Bai, AIR 1972 SC 637, this contention has no force, and the law laid down to the contrary in the aforesaid authorities … as the property is redeemed. In Mahabir Gope v. Harbans Narain Singh, AIR 1952 SC 205, their Lordships have held:'The general rule is that a … 38, in support of his submission that the protection of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 is available to a tenant of the mortgagee. But, it will suffice to say that in view of … it stood prior to amendment of 1976, has any right to the present possession of the property. Under Section 76(a) of the Transfer of Property Act, if during the continuance of the mortgage, the mortgage takes possession of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 25 2005

Shri Y.J. Patki, Prorietor of Patki and Dadarkar, Chartered Architects ...

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Aug-25-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25F, 32C(2) and 33C(2); Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Apprentices Act; Payment of Bonus Act

Reported in : [2005(107)FLR1151]; (2006)ILLJ677Bom

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … the learned Judge of the Labour Court at Pune dated 6th December 1995 allowing an application filed under section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, this petition has been filed by the employer. By the impugned … order the petitioner has been directed to pay a sum of Rs. 76,692/-to the applicant-the present respondent by way of notice pay, retrenchment compensation and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 04 1988

Pomal Kanji Govindji and ors. Vs. Vrajlal Karsandas Purohit and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Nov-04-1988

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 60, 76 and 111

Reported in : AIR1989SC436; (1989)1GLR418; JT1988(4)SC307; 1988(2)SCALE1287; (1989)1SCC458; [1988]Supp3SCR826

of the term. In our opinion, such observations will apply with greater force in the present inflationary market. The other decision to Which reference may … possession is entitled to the protection of the provisions of the Rajasthan Premises (Control of Rent and Eviction) Act, 1950 against the mortgagor after the redemption of the mortgage. P.K. Banerjee, C.J. delivering the judgment of the Court … Court in Khatubai Nathu Sumra v. Rajgo Mulji Nanji and Ors : AIR1979Guj171 , where the learned Single Judge in the background of a mortgage, … question was whether after redemption of mortgage such lease is binding on the mortgagor. It was held that Section 76(a) of the Transfer of Property Act would not apply to such cases. There must be express words showing

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 12 2000

K. Komaraiah Vs. Industrial Tribunal-cum-additional Labour Court, Hyde ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-12-2000

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2-A, 11-A, 18(1) and 25-FFF & O, 25(H)(2); Industrial Disputes (Amendment) Act, 1982; Motor Transport Workers Act, 1961; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2000(5)ALD298; 2000(4)ALT441; [2000(87)FLR357]

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … of ID Nos.l, 82, 81, 77, 137, 103, 4, 80, 79, 78, 76, 75, 5, 10, 89, 87, 100, 6, 92, 88, 8, 11, 102, … In connection with the reopening of the establishment, the 2nd respondent entered into settlement under sub-section (1) of Section 18 of the Act benefiting only those employees who were on its permanent roll and accordingly such employees

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial