Advanced Search Results

Sanjeet Singh Kaila vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

EWHC694is relied upon. Learned counsel also argues that the petition is not covered under Section 27 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Counsel argues that Section 27 requiring a complaint to be made to the Central Government first, operates merely … MD DBN MNAMS CLASSIFIED SPECIALIST AVIATION MEDICINE46G AF DT10JAN05This 34 Yrs Old Fighter pilot ejected from MIG21BIS Type 75 aircraft on 04 Jan 05 at around 1036 Hrs. The officer was hospitalized and investigated at 187 MH

S. Venkataraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Chief of the Air Staf ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC594

service, which is being challenged in this writ petition. The petitioner submitted representation under Section 26 of The Air Force Act, 1950, to the 3rd respondent through proper channel.4. The Airmen are assessed annually for true proficiency and character. In … airmen will have to score the following minimum percentage :- (i) Sgt 70% (ii) JWO 72.5% (iii) WO/MWO 75% Note :- The rank actually held by the airmen during the last five years will be taken into

ibrahim Khan Vs. Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Develop ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 19; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2, 10, 74 and 75; Constitution of India - Article 226; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Hyderabad Civil Service Rules - Rule 231; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD619; 2001(5)ALT400

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Industrial Disputes Act or seek relief, -if possible, under Sections 74 and 75 of the Act.12. Similar aspect of the matter was considered in Gopi … or not under the Industrial Disputes Act can be effectively decided by the Tribunal in an application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act.2. The petitioner worked as Vehicle Inspector in the Office of Municipal Corporation

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … to 527 Int. and F.S. Coy From my B.7 Jat and reported to the Unit on 10 December, 75 and stayed until 23 March, 78. On 12 Jan. 75 I had taken over from Capt. R.S. Rathaur

Ex. Sq. Leader Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 17

Reported in : 76(1998)DLT554

him to show cause as to why he should not be removed from the service under Section 19, Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 17, Air Force Rules, 1969 for avoiding flying duties and showing lack of confidence in … of the writ petition, the Government of India passed an order on the 17th of February, 1998 granting 75% pensionary benefits to the petitioner. The order reads as under:'I am directed to refer to the Explanationn dated

Ex. Sq. Leader Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air force Rules, 1969 - Rule 17

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ652

him to show cause as to why he should not be removed from the service under Section 19, Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 17 Air Force Rules, 1969 for avoiding flying duties and showing lack of confidence in … of the writ petition, the Government of India passed an order on the 17th of February, 1998 granting 75% pensionary benefits to the petitioner. The order reads as under:- 'I am directed to refer to the Explanationn

Holy Family English Medium L.P. School and Others Vs. Employees State ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Menon, J. Dismissal of the Insurance cases filed by the appellants/educational institutions before the Employees Insurance Court under Section 75 r/w Sec. 77 of the Employees Insurance Act (for short Act ) for a declaration that their Institutions

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … and proceed with pre-determined mind and with the sole object of finishing the service career of the petitioner. 75. When an authority, who is required to act reasonably and impartially, adopts two inconsistent and wholly irreconcilable courses

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Devjee Mishra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Right to Information

submitted an application against the District Court Martial order dated 17th June, 2004, under Section 161 of the Air Force Act 1950, addressed to the Air Chief Marshal on 11th October, 2004. The respondent was informed vide letter dated 12th … neglect his AFIC. The accused was earlier also tried by a DCM for the offence of AWL for 75 days and he was awarded sentence of three months detention and reduce to the ranks. The court awarded

Hav. Ved Prakash Sangwan Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 20 and 23; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 11, 12 and 17; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)749

the defense Department where services of a person were dispensed with invoking power under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950. That Section reads as under:- '18. Tenure of service under the Act._Every person subject to this Act shall