Advanced Search Results

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … It was held, that the executive functions of the President are to be exercised by virtue of Article 74 with the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers. The President has under Rules or Business prescribed

ibrahim Khan Vs. Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Develop ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 19; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2, 10, 74 and 75; Constitution of India - Article 226; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Hyderabad Civil Service Rules - Rule 231; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD619; 2001(5)ALT400

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … of the Industrial Disputes Act or seek relief, -if possible, under Sections 74 and 75 of the Act.12. Similar aspect of the matter was considered … or not under the Industrial Disputes Act can be effectively decided by the Tribunal in an application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act.2. The petitioner worked as Vehicle Inspector in the Office of Municipal Corporation

S. Venkataraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Chief of the Air Staf ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC594

service, which is being challenged in this writ petition. The petitioner submitted representation under Section 26 of The Air Force Act, 1950, to the 3rd respondent through proper channel.4. The Airmen are assessed annually for true proficiency and character. In … out of which a total of 26 marks are allotted to drill bearing and interest in sports. Remaining 74 marks, the petitioner has to secure 94.6%, whereas other normal and medically fit airmen have to secure only

Ex-signalman Shri Bhagwan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secreta ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(3), 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 to 25 and 27; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 22, 191, 191(2) and 192; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 12, 20, 21, 22, 165, 167, 173, 173A, 183, 185, 187 and 188; defense Service Regulation; Medical Services of the Armed Forces Medical, 1962; General Regulations - Sections 1; Service Pension and Gratuity Regulations - Sections 2 and 3; Disability Pensionary Awards Regulations - Sections 4; Special Pensionary Awards Regulations - Sections 5; Entitlement Rules, 1961 - Rule 7; Army/Air Force Act; Entitlement (Amendment) Rules, 1982; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excises Act, 1944

Reported in : 103(2003)DLT269; 2003(3)SLJ303(Delhi)

rank in the Army are the same for officers in the Army and for all personnel in the Air Force and Navy. thereforee, while the general principles that we have determined can be applied more or less uniformly, … Certain procedures have been laid down in various documents about which very few people seem to be aware.Army Act, 1950 13. Retirement, release or discharge of Army personnel is provided for in Section 22 of the Army Act, … (Pensions)14188Junior Commissioned Officers, Other Ranks and Non-Combatants (Enrolled)Controller of defense Accounts (Pensions) 74. The effect of Regulations 21 and 22 of the Pension Regulations Part

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … there was any substance, truth or veracity in the complaint received against the respondent Nos. 4 and 5. 74. In the backdrop of what have been discussed above, there is considerable force in the contention of the

S. Chaoba Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Constitution of India (15th Amendment) Act, 1963; Constitution of India (47th Amendment) Act, 1976; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 19 and 25

the procedure applicable to, any Court or other authority under the Army Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), the Air Force Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (47 of … learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that while convening the Summary Security Force Courts, the provisions of Section 74(2) of the B.S.F. Act was violated inasmuch as there was no grave reason for immediate action and the

Pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd. Vs.rama Krishna Sareen

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … the incident, was conducted, by the Ministry of Civil Aviation, under Rule 74 of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 (hereinafter referred to as “the Aircraft Rules”). … alleged the petitioner, amounted to unfair labour practice, and also attracted the definition of “retrenchment”, as contained in Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”), as the petitioner had

Col. (Retd) Rama Krishna Sareen vs.pawan Hans Helicopters Ltd.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … the incident, was conducted, by the Ministry of Civil Aviation, under Rule 74 of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 (hereinafter referred to as “the Aircraft Rules”). … alleged the petitioner, amounted to unfair labour practice, and also attracted the definition of “retrenchment”, as contained in Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”), as the petitioner had

Rama Krishna Sareen vs.union of India &Ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … the incident, was conducted, by the Ministry of Civil Aviation, under Rule 74 of the Aircraft Rules, 1937 (hereinafter referred to as “the Aircraft Rules”). … alleged the petitioner, amounted to unfair labour practice, and also attracted the definition of “retrenchment”, as contained in Section 2(oo) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”), as the petitioner had

Prosenjit Kundu Vs. the Presiding Officer, General Security Force Cour ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Army Act, 1950; Army Rules; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Evidence Act - Sections 32; Constitution of India - Articles 21, 32, 226 and 227; Border Security Force Act - Sections 117(2) and 130; Border Security Force Rules; defense Service Regulations

Reported in : 2006(88)DRJ856

with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950 or the Navy Act, 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act is a complete code by itself and … P.4), and the order of the Director General, BSF rejecting the statutory petition filed by the petitioner under Section 117(2) of the Border Security Force Act, and a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus … under:-That as observed by this Court in Cr. W. Nos. 53 and 74 of 1979 decided on 7.4.1981, 'Clause (4) of Article 227 of the