Advanced Search Results
Balbir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Nov-10-1994
Criminal
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 9, 72, 124 and 125; Leave Rules - Rule 9; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1973 - Sections 475; Army Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 325
1995(43)BLJR343; 1994(4)SCALE904; (1995)1SCC90; [1994]Supp5SCR422; 1995(1)LC275(SC)
- jurisdiction - Sections 302 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 72, 124 and 125 of Air Force Act, 1950, Section 475 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 -
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEx. Lac Gk Singh (656393), Trade â Med/Asst Vs. Union of India, M ...
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi
Sep-09-2013
Land Acquisition
the regular criminal court. In this connection Mr.Chandrajeet Yadav tried to contend that according to the provisions of Section 72 of the Air Force Act, 1950, the trial ought to have been held by the criminal court and … tried by the District Court Martial for two charges. The first charge was under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950 for committing a civil offence, that is to say, using criminal force to a woman intending to outrage
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskS.R. Tripathi Vs. State and anr.
Allahabad
Sep-09-1963
Criminal
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 71, 72, 125 and 125(1)
AIR1964All371; 1964CriLJ184
Magistrate to take further action in accordance with the law. Criminal - Sections 71, 72 and 125 of Air Force Act, 1950 - jurisdiction of Court Martial - offences falling under Section 71. - summons were issued to the commanding
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Vs. E ...
Delhi
Nov-13-2002
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 20(7), 65 and 71; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 18, 18(1), 24, 24(4) and 36; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 45; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(3) and 14(4)
101(2002)DLT267; 2003(1)SLJ171(Delhi)
On April 27, 1995, charges were framed against the respondent. He was charged under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950, for having used criminal force to a woman with the intention to outrage her modesty. The respondent was … less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.' Section 71: '71. Civil Offences.- Subject to the provisions of Section 72, any person subject to this Act who at any place in or beyond India commits any civil offence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ram Sunder Ram
Kolkata
Dec-10-2004
Civil
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 17, 19, 20 and 72; ;Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 13(3), 177 and 182; ;Air Force Rules - Rule 137; ;Constitution of India - Article 33
2005(4)CHN361
case of S. K. Rao. In Cheema's case it was held that the object of Rule 137(g) of Air Force Rules is that the statements recorded in the Court of Inquiry shall not be admissible in evidence in … the writ petitioner/ respondent was discharged from army service under the provisions of section 20 of the Army Act, 1950 read with Army Rules 13(3)(V) read with Clause (v) of the Table and after affording the writ petitioner/respondent … service is too severe. As such, the learned Judges set aside the said punishment as being violative of section 72 of the Army Act and the case was remanded to Court Martial. This Court fails to appreciate the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Narayan Tiwari. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-21-2011
Air Force
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 157, 73
materia with Section 73 of the Air Force Act, 1950. In the said decision this Court held that Section 72 of the Army Act merely provides that the Court Martial may, on convicting a person, award either the … three months detention and reduction in rank was awarded to the appellant. As per the provisions of the Air Force Act, 1950 the aforesaid findings as well as the punishment were subject to confirmation by the Confirming Authority, consequently, the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskExtra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr
Supreme Court of India
Jul-13-2016
Land Acquisition
court inherently lacked jurisdiction to try the accused. This Court considered the provisions of Section 72 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (corresponding to Section 70 of the Army Act), Sections 124 and 125 of the said Act (corresponding to
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM. Chinnapaiyan Versus Air Officer Commanding / Officiating Group and ...
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai
Jun-28-2010
Land Acquisition
with a copy marked to the Air Officer Commanding in Chief, Nagpur. As per Section 26 of the Air Force Act, 1950, read with AFO 397/72 Para 621 the grievances set out by the petitioner ought to have been dealt
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSyed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others
Andhra Pradesh
Dec-07-1999
ContractConstitution
Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B
2000(1)ALD689
with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act is a complete code by itself … beyond its permissible carrying capacity as exhibited under sub-section (2) or sub-section (3) ornotified under sub-section (4) of Section 72 of the Act, the Railway administration may, in addition to the freight and other charges, recover from the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAjit Singh Vs. State of Punjab
Punjab and Haryana
Jan-28-1970
Criminal
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 9 and 71; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) 1898 - Sections 342, 537 and 549; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rule 3
AIR1970P& H351; 1970CriLJ1119
utmost endeavours to apprehend and secure any person accused of such offence.' Attention was also drawn to the Air Force Act, 1950. Section 2 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Is in the following terms:-- 'The following persons shall he subject … final.' Section 71 of the Air Force Act is in the following terms:-- 'Subject to the provisions of Section 72, any person subject to this Act who at any place in or beyond India commits any civil offence
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »