Advanced Search Results

M.M. Malhotra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act 1950 - Sections 19, 45 and 191(2); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 45, 46 and 191(5); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 5, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3) and 16; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16 and 16(4); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 1 to 4, 14 and 16(4); Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR2006SC80; 2006(1)BomCR661; [2005(107)FLR1006]; JT2005(9)SC506; 2006(1)MhLj1; 2006MPLJ1(SC); 2005(8)SCALE202; (2005)8SCC351; 2006(1)SLJ303(SC)

upon to show-cause as to why he should not be dismissed/removed from service under Section 19 of the Air Force Act; 1950 (in short the 'Act') read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969. The charges leveled in

Raipur Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd., Raipur and anr. Vs. the State of Madhy ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 166(3) and 226; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 68C and 68D(2); Business Allocation Rules

Reported in : AIR1969MP150; 1968MPLJ854

of the grounds of challenge are similar to those raised in Premchand Jain v. State of M. P. AIR 1965 Madh Pra 196, Premchand Jain v. State of M. P. AIR 1966 Madh Pra 117 and Capital … it with some modifications, and fixing a date for the coming into force of each Scheme. Thereafter, the various Schemes, as approved and modified under … Madhya Pra-desh State Road Transport Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the Corporation), constituted under the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950, published proposals in various issues of the Gazette propounding the aforestated Schemes for the running and operation by … 26, 33, 42, 60 and 61, published by the State Government under Section 68-D (3) of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, (hereinafter called the Act),

Green Bus (Rajasthan) Private Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ...

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 68C, 68D and 68I; Madhya Pradesh Government Business Rules - Rules 21, 33A and 54; Rajasthan State Road Transport Services (Development) Rules, 1960 - Rules 2, 3, 7(1) and 8; Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 3

Reported in : AIR1968Raj169

In support of his contention he placed reliance on Nageswara Rao v. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, AIR 1959 SC 308 In that case the Business Rules of the Andhra Pradesh State came up for consideration … be taken to be ultra vires of his powers. There is no force in the first objection of the petitioners14. This brings us to the … argued that the Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation constituted by the State Government under the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 was a different legal entity from the Rajasthan State Roadways and as such it could not step into … ORDER Jaipur, April 16 1965.No. F. 1 (8) Jud-55-In pursuance of Section/Rule 7(1) of the Rajasthan State Road Transport Services (Development) Rules, 1960, the … approval and modifications of the scheme under Section 68-D of the Motor Vehicles Act. 1939 (Central Act

Rao Shankar Pratap Singh Vs. the State of Madhya Pradesh

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Tenancy Law; M.P. Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienaied Lands) Act, 1950 - Sections 2 and 4(2); Central Provinces Land Revenue Act, 1917 - Sections 2(5)

Reported in : AIR1960MP86

such a reference would be legitimate. In Tumahole Bereng v. The King, AIR 1949 PC 172 Lord MacDermott observed at page 176-'The wisdom of that … 1881. This brief history takes us to the law which was in force at the time when the consolidating and amending Act of 1917 was … deal with the rights of ex-proprietors under the Madhya Pradesh Abolition of Proprietary Rights (Estates, Mahals, Alienated Lands) Act, 1950 (I of 1951), and Clause (b) of Section 2 of the Act provides for adopting the meaning of … land of a proprietor) includes the following, and no other, landnamely:-Section 2 (17).- 'Sir-land' means.(a)land finally recorded under section 68 as'sir-land' in the record-of-rights of the current settlement; (a)land finally recorded undersection 69 as 'sir-land' in the papers

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

court inherently lacked jurisdiction to try the accused. This Court considered the provisions of Section 72 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (corresponding to Section 70 of the Army Act), Sections 124 and 125 of the said Act (corresponding to

Joginder Singh Surmukh Singh Vs. Smt. Balkaran Kaur

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1972CriLJ93

connection on Gurnam Singh v. Mt. Datto AIR 1950 East Punj 20, and Bhimrao's case AIR 1963 … was reiterated by the learned Judge in Smt. Parson Kaur v. Bakhshish Singh 1970 Cur LJ 172 : AIR 1971 Punj 88. It has been further held in this case that Section 5 of the Indian Limitation … element which must be satisfied before the decision can be brought into force. Thus considered the making of the award cannot consist merely in the … and that it was not necessary that service should have been effected through police agency. No violation of Section 68, therefore, took place and the order directing ex parte proceedings cannot be held to be bad in law … further held in this case that Section 5 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963. applies to an application for setting aside an ex parte order

Chief of Army Staff and ors. Vs. Major Dharam Pal Kukrety

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14(2) and 71; Army Act - Sections 121, 153 and 160

Reported in : AIR1985SC703; 1985CriLJ913; 1986LabIC41; (1985)IILLJ165SC; 1985(1)SCALE582; (1985)2SCC412; [1985]3SCR415; 1985(17)LC863(SC)

G.B. Singh v. Union of India and Ors. [1973] Crl. L.J. 485. That was a case under the Air Force Act, 1950 (Act No. 45 of 1950). In that case, the officer was found guilty by a general court-martial and … it will also be relevant to set out the provisions of Rules 68, 69, 70 and 71 of the Army Rules. These Rules provide as … and the Army Rules to which we now turn.8. Chapter IV of the Army Act, which consists of Section 18 to 24, deals with the conditions of service of persons appointed under the Act. Section 18 provides

Tej Ram and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Motor Vehicles

Acts : Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 68C, 68D and 68I; Constitution of India - Articles 166 and 226; Rajasthan State Road Transport Services (Development) Rules, 1965 - Rule 6

Reported in : AIR1969Raj233; 1968()WLN19

of the Supreme Court H. C. Narayanappa v. State of Mysore, AIR 1950 SC 1073 Shah J., who delivered the unanimous judgment of the Constitution … read to us a number of passages from G. Nageswara Rao v. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation, AIR 1959 SC 308 and Union of India v. P. K. Roy. AIR 1968 SC 850.7. It is well … on record and thereby approved the scheme proposed for the route. The scheme was ordered to come into force from 1-7-68. The approved scheme was published in the Rajaslhan Gazette of 3-5-68.3. A number of grounds have … State undertaking, published a notification under Section 68-C of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1939, hereinafter to be referred as the 'Act' read with Rules 3

Hindustan Lever Ltd. Vs. Ivth Industrial Tribunal and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 7A and 10; ;Air Force Act, 1950; ;Army Act, 1950; ;Navy Act, 1957; ;Uttar Pradesh Act - Section 2; ;Constitution of India - Articles 12 and 226

Reported in : [2007(113)FLR1090]

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … being separation of relationship with the management, such ex-employees cannot claim to be workmen as a contemplated under Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and the issues raised cannot be subject-matter of an industrial dispute … by the learned Counsel for the petitioner, in Para. 9, at page 682:.In our opinion, the appellant, having voluntarily rendered his resignation pursuant to a

Smt. Saraswati Devi and ors. Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Civil

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Uttar Pradesh State Transport Services (Development) Rules, 1958 - Rules 4(1), 5(5), 7(2) and 7(4); Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 68A to 68E, 68D(1), 68D(2), 68D(3), 68E(1), 68E(2), 68E(3)

Reported in : AIR1981SC660; (1980)4SCC738; [1980]1SCR1005

Kacker, who, however, argued the point covered by ground (iv) with great force and also challenged the finding recorded by the High Court in relation … or a State Government; (ii) any Road Transport Corporation established under Section 3 of the Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950; (iv) any municipality or any corporation or company owned or controlled by the Central Government or one or … placed before the High Court mainly on Gullapalli Nageswara Rao v. Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation : AIR1959SC308 , which was decided by a Bench of five Judges of this Court. The crucial question before the … 21st January, 1961 in the Government Gazette of Uttar Pradesh under Section 68C of the Motor Vehicles Act 1939 (for brevity, the Act) be set