Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 67 · Page 1 of about 638 results (0.127 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

May 26 2005

Chairman-cum-managing Director, Fertilizer Corporation of India Limite ...

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : May-26-2005

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2, 2(1), 4(1), 7(4), 7(7), 13, 18 and 103; Payment of Gratuity (Central) Rules - Rules 10(2) and 17; Apprentice Act, 1961 - Sections 2; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948 - Sections 2(9) and 2(22); Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1965; Payment of Wages Act; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Employees Provident Fund Act, 1952; Air force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 67; Labour Law; Indian Contract Act

Reported in : 2005(2)ESC1547

holds a civil post under the Central Government or a State Government or who is subject to the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957).39. … successful completion of their training.54. As regards the argument of engagement of minors, suffice it to say that Section 67 of the Factories Act, 1948 prohibits employment of young children below 14 years of age. Section 67 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 30 2003

S. Venkataraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Chief of the Air Staf ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-30-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC594

service, which is being challenged in this writ petition. The petitioner submitted representation under Section 26 of The Air Force Act, 1950, to the 3rd respondent through proper channel.4. The Airmen are assessed annually for true proficiency and character. In … out the yearwise assessment of the petitioner in para-9 of the counter affidavit. The petitioner has scored only 67.4% for the years 1996-2000 and he was not meeting the assessment criteria for grant of extension of service.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 13 2016

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jul-13-2016

Subject : Land Acquisition

court inherently lacked jurisdiction to try the accused. This Court considered the provisions of Section 72 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (corresponding to Section 70 of the Army Act), Sections 124 and 125 of the said Act (corresponding to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Sep 27 2016

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Devjee Mishra

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-27-2016

Subject : Right to Information

submitted an application against the District Court Martial order dated 17th June, 2004, under Section 161 of the Air Force Act 1950, addressed to the Air Chief Marshal on 11th October, 2004. The respondent was informed vide letter dated 12th

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 21 1965

Gajanan Vishwanath Ketkar Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Jul-21-1965

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Defence of India Rules, 1962 - Rule 30(1)

Reported in : AIR1967Bom96; (1966)68BOMLR321; 1967CriLJ427; ILR1966Bom839

a place of strategic importance. There is a big ordinance factory situated near Poona and a large military force has been stationed at Poona. The help of the military would have to be requisitioned in case of … various capacities. He was the Editor of Kesari for 5 years till 1950 and a Trustee of the Kesari Maratha Trust. He was also the … the petition. He is an old man of 67 years . He is a double graduate of … Mr. Pathak relied upon the decision of this Court in Bal keshav Thakre v. Commr. of Police : AIR1956Bom490 . In that case, the Commissioner of Police in his affidavit had stated that the detenu, Keshav Sitaram … against him on 24-11-64. The petitioner has alleged that his detention is actuated by malice and that it cannot be justified for the reasons for … ia an application by Gajanan Vishwanath ketkar under Section 491, Cr. P. C. and Art, 226 of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2006

District Forest Officer, Madurai Division Vs. P. Ganesan (Died) and or ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-29-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 2(1), 30, 30(1) and 30(2); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 28; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; ;Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 - Rules 36 and 43; Constitution of India - Article 226; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2007ACJ1521; [2007(112)FLR561]; (2006)4MLJ1653

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-(1) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … definition of the term 'workman'.It is an admitted position that the respondent-workman was employed as forest guard. In Section II of the Act, list of persons, who, subject to the provisions of Section 2(1)(n) are included in … quash the order of Deputy Commissioner of Labour, Madurai in W.C. No. 67/91, dated 15.03.1994.2. The brief facts necessary for the disposal of the Writ

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 31 2013

Corporal Vijayakumar Vs. Union of India, Represented by Its Defence Se ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : Jul-31-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

officers. This necessitated filing of a series of Redressel of Grievances Applications (ROGs) under Section 26 of the Air Force Act, 1950, read with Para. 621 of the Air Force Regulations, 1969, and its Correction Slip No. 24/VII/70, (in short … have recorded three inconsistent names for the alleged “disability” in this case, (viz., “Affective Psychosis (Hypomania)- ICD V 67”, “Affective Psychosis (Bipolar)” and “Affective Psychosis (Hypomania)- ICD296 (a)”, respectively). In the light of the undisputed authority, Exhibits-P10

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 23 1968

Kailash Chandra JaIn and anr. Vs. the State of Rajasthan

Court : Rajasthan

Decided on : Mar-23-1968

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Rajasthan Civil Service Rules, 1951 - Rule 20

Reported in : AIR1969Raj68; (1969)IILLJ44Raj

but does not include any such person (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934, or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an … industry and this Act applies equally to industries run by the State Government. The term 'Industries' according to Section 2 (j) of this Act means: 'Any business, trade, undertaking, manufacture or calling of employers and includes any

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 18 2018

Dinesh Pal vs.gnct of Delhi and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-18-2018

Subject : Education

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950 ), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950 ), or the Navy Act, 1957 … award dated, 19th February, 2018, passed by the Labour Court, on an application filed by the petitioner under Section 37-C (ii) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as “the ID Act”). The petitioner had,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2026

Cpl. Deepa Ram vs Union of India and Ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-12-2026

Subject : Right to Information

matter ofindividual choice or entitlement; it is governed by statutory provisions and binding policy instruments issued under the Air Force Act, 1950. The AFO No.33/2017 which is in force and governs the field, confers only a limited privilege upon airmen … as discharge from the service on the ground of his selection on a civil post. On 07.08.2022, the Section Commander after scrutinising the application, recommended and forwarded the same. On 13.08.2022, the Adjutant and the Commanding Officer … shortlisted for interview. On 06.03.2022, the petitioner cleared the Interview and secured 67.20/100 marks.5. On 24.05.2022, the petitioner was issued an Offer Letter with hisselected

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial