Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Vs. E ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 20(7), 65 and 71; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 18, 18(1), 24, 24(4) and 36; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 45; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(3) and 14(4)

Reported in : 101(2002)DLT267; 2003(1)SLJ171(Delhi)

criminal force to a woman with the intention to outrage her modesty. The respondent was also charged under Section 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950, for having committed an act prejudicial to good order and discipline of … On April 27, 1995, charges were framed against the respondent. He was charged under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950, for having used criminal force to a woman with the intention to outrage her modesty. The respondent was

F.R. Jesuratnam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 65 and 73

Reported in : AIR1981SC1595a; [1981(43)FLR264]; (1981)IILLJ195SC; 1981(3)SCALE1056; (1981)3SCC525; [1982]1SCR40; 1981(2)SLJ239(SC); 1981(13)LC630(SC)

secretly on several occasion a foreign national, contrary to the existing order on the subject and (2) under Section 65, Air Force Act, 1950 for improperly accepting a gift from a foreign national. He was found not guilty … tried by a General Court Martial on four charges and was convicted on two: (1) under Section 45, Air Force Act, 1950 for behaving in a manner unbecoming of the position and character expected of him as an officer in

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Flt. Lt. G.S. Bajwa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 7, 41, 41(2), 65, 111 and 125; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 21, 22 and 33; Army Act; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 88, 89, 100, 102, 110, 111 and 125; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 104(2003)DLT618(SC); JT2003(4)SC505; 2003(4)SCALE494; (2003)9SCC630; [2003]3SCR1092; 2003(3)SLJ288(SC); 2003(2)LC849(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1479

Air Force discipline. Accordingly the respondent was charged of offences punishable under Sections 41(2) and 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). According to the respondent the proceedings before the General Court Martial were … of imprisonment for a term which could extend to 14 years under Section 41(2) and 7 years under Section 65 of the Act. Moreover he was denied copies of the day to day proceedings which were essential for

Ex. Lac Gk Singh (656393), Trade – Med/Asst Vs. Union of India, M ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

tried by the District Court Martial for two charges. The first charge was under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950 for committing a civil offence, that is to say, using criminal force to a woman intending to outrage … to outrage her modesty punishable under Section 354 of the Indian Penal Code. The second charge was under section 65 of the Air Force Act, for an act prejudicial to the good order and Air Force discipline. The

Court on Its Own Motion Vs. Mr. Gulshan Bajwa

Court : Delhi

Subject : Contempt of Court

Acts : Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 13; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 17(5) and 19(3); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 65, 110 and 161(2); Constitution of India - Article 215; Contempt of Courts (Amendment) Act; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12

Reported in : 141(2007)DLT111

the petitioner under arrest; the purported order dated 14.1.1985 passed by the Central Government under Section 161(2) of Air Force Act, 1950; Section 65 & 110 of Air Force Act; the order for arrest of the petitioner during the trial by General

G.S. Bajwa Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950; Air Force Rules - Rule 102

Reported in : 59(1995)DLT742

good order and Air Force discipline, and thereby committing offences punishable under Section 41(2) and Section 65 of Air Force Act. 1950. The said General Court Martial was conducted illegally and improperly. In proceeding of the said General Court Martial

Om Prakash Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

noteworthy that this recovery was the subject matter of the first charge framed under Rule 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950 against the petitioner.25. With reference to the record, we may note that the aforenoticed submission of the Naik … Om Prakash of 11 BRD, AF, an airman of the regular Air Force is charged with :First Charge Section 65 AF Act, 1950 Second charge Section 52 (b) AF Act, 1950 AN ACT PREJUDICIAL TO GOOD ORDER AND

Bakhshish Singh Vs. Court Martial and ors.

Court : Jammu and Kashmir

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1972CriLJ1630

Nos. 2 to 5 herein was constituted to try the petitioner on the following charges:First Charge. Section 71 Air Force Act, 1950. Committing a civil offence that is to say transporting essential commodities made punishable under Section 7 of the … of Food) order dated 18th April 1967: Dal Chana ... 14 bags. Kabuli Chana ... 46 bags.Second charge. Section 65. Air Force Act, 1950.An act prejudicial to good order and air force discipline. In that they i.e. both

Sgt Praveen Kr. Thul Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

whereby the petitioner was found guilty of having committed the offence under Sections 40(c) and 65 of the Air Force Act and sentenced (a) to be reduced to the ranks; and (b) to be severely reprimanded. Thereupon, a statutory … some derogatory remarks, which resulted in the issue of a charge sheet viz. FIRST CHARGE SECTION 40(c) AF ACT 1950 USING INSUBORDINATE LANGUAGE TO HIS SUPERIOR OFFICER in that he, at Shimla (HP), on 13 Sep 06, while

ex.lac Yogesh Pathania Vs. Union of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

672315 WO Agar Singh Eqpt Asst by pushing the said WO Agar Singh from back. 2 7. Under Section 65 Air Force Act, 1950 for an act prejudicial to good order and Air Force Discipline. In that he, … 01.02.2010 confirmed on 09.03.2010 and also against rejection of his statutory complaint under Section 161 (2) of the Air Force Act, 1950 by the Chief of Air Staff. The DCM was initiated on account of an incident on the intervening