Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 64 · Page 1 of about 731 results (0.154 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 30 2003

S. Venkataraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Chief of the Air Staf ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Jan-30-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC594

service, which is being challenged in this writ petition. The petitioner submitted representation under Section 26 of The Air Force Act, 1950, to the 3rd respondent through proper channel.4. The Airmen are assessed annually for true proficiency and character. In … petitioner has been assessed as 'Very Good' throughout, but for the year 2001, the concerned officer has awarded 64 marks without disclosing any reason. The petitioner's right leg is amputated totally due to accident attributable to service

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2025

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-11-2025

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

combat air force roles for women as fighter pilots, helicopter pilots, etc. 64. It does not stand to reason that when women officers like Captain … Secretary & Anr., 2010 SCC OnLine Del 1116, wherein it has been held as under: - “45. The Air Force after due sanction of the President of India itself brought a policy into force for recruitment of women. … virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2013

Ex. Lac Gk Singh (656393), Trade – Med/Asst Vs. Union of India, M ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : Sep-09-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

tried by the District Court Martial for two charges. The first charge was under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950 for committing a civil offence, that is to say, using criminal force to a woman intending to outrage … After receiving the statement Ext.W, the Court proceeded to put relevant questions to the accused as per Rule 64(4) of the Air Force Rules. During the interrogation with regard to various evidence and circumstances appearing against the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 19 2000

Sukhdev Singh Gill Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-19-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965 - Rule 2; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 4(1), 63, 73, 81(4), 113, 114 and 116(1); Constitution of India - Articles 33 and 352

Reported in : [2000(87)FLR951]; 2000(7)SCALE259; (2000)8SCC492; [2000]Supp4SCR292; (2001)1UPLBEC664

Section 3(xi) of the Army Act which reads as follows:(xi) 'the Forces' means the regular Army, Navy and Air Force or any part of any one or more of them; 12. This Court also referred 7to Section 4(1) … considered the nature of the service in the G.R.E.F. and the applicability of certain provisions of the Army Act, 1950 for the purpose of taking disciplinary action against the Officers of the G.R.E.F. In that judgment this Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 18 2023

Security Printing Corporation Of India Ltd And Ors Etc. Vs. Vijay D. K ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-18-2023

Subject : Land Acquisition

led to that dispute, but does not Union; include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … 59(1) of the 1948 Act.7. But it was argued on behalf of the Union of India that under Section 64(1) of the 1948 Act, the State Government was entitled to make Rules exempting the application of the provisions

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 09 1972

C. Rudre Gowda Vs. Angadi Chikkanna

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-09-1972

Subject : Civil

Acts : Mysore General Clauses Act, 1899 - Sections 1(3), 3, 4, 6, 7, 61, 64 and 64(2); General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 6; Mysore Agriculturists Relief Act, 1928; Mysore Agricultural Debtors Relief Act, 1966; Constitution of India - Article 14; Bombay Municipal Boroughs Act, 1925 - Sections 61(1), 75 and 77; Municipal Rules

Reported in : AIR1972Kant199; AIR1972Mys199

350 that the Mysore Agriculturists Relief Act, 1928, was no longer in force, and, therefore, the Munsiff ordered that no relief could be granted to … and those rules were brought into effect with effect from December 1, 1950. Under those rules the Municipality was collecting octroi until August 1, 1953, … 1969, as per the notification issued by the State Government under Section 1 (3) of the Act. By Section 64 (2) of the Act, the Mysore Agriculturists Relief Act, 1928, was repealed. It was however provided that such … of the above contention, a decision of the Supreme Court in Mulchand Odhavii v. Rajkot Borough Municipality, : AIR1970SC685 was relied upon. Venkataswami, J., who decided that case negatived the above submission after distinguishing the decision of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 04 2010

Sergeant B. K. Mehta of 2305 Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : Jun-04-2010

Subject : Land Acquisition

60 years, R/o. Village P.O. Dhanowali Tehsil and District Jallandhar amounting to culpable homicide punishable under Section 71 Air Force Act, 1950 R/w. Section 304A IPC, 1860 and further he had also committed civil offence by causing disappearance of the … leading to the death of Amarnath to the nearest Police Station extended to the offences under Sections 60, 64 and 65 of the Air Force Act. Further he was also charged for the offences under Section 42(e)

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 12 1997

P.V. Narsimha Rao Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-12-1997

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 75(2) and 105; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 164; ;Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 10; Indian Penal code, 1860 - Sections 120B; Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 2

Reported in : 1997VAD(Delhi)265; 68(1997)DLT553; 1997(43)DRJ108; 1997RLR567

House and of its members and committees immediately before the coming into force of section 15 of the Constitution (Forty-fourth Amendment) Act, 1978. (4) The … be performed'. - LABOUR & SERVICES Disability Pension: [Vikramajit Sen, Sanjiv Khanna & S.L.Bhayana,JJ] Army Act (46 of 1950), Section 192 & Pension Regulations for the Army (1961), Regulation. 173 Claimant was on casual leave Sustained injury which … and Ramalinga Reddy left the residence of M.Veerappa Moily with three suit cases and a handbag for Bangalore Airport. Those suit-cases included the two brought by M.Thimmegowda. D.K.Audikesvulu also reached there with one V.I.P. suit case and

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 07 1999

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-07-1999

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act is a complete code by itself … taken me to the various provisions of Chapter IX of the Railways Act, 1989 (for short the Act). Section 64 of the Act contemplates that every person entrusting any goods to a railway administration for carriage shall execute

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 07 2020

Sri Gururaj R Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Oct-07-2020

Subject : Land Acquisition

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … 1947, (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’ for short) as they are Workman within the definition of Section 2(s) of the said Act. Without prejudice to the aforesaid contention, the learned counsel would further submit that,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial