Advanced Search Results
P. Tej Raj Sharma Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Karnataka
Mar-10-1986
Motor Vehicles
Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 2(3), 2(15), 2(16), 2(18A), 2(29A), 47(1), 47(1H), 49, 50, 51, 55(1B), 58, 63(7), 63(11B) and 63(12); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19 and 19(1)
ILR1986KAR2701; 1986(2)KarLJ24
63(7) was introduced by Act No. 47 of 1978. It came into force with effect from 4-5-1978. Prior to the introduction of the proviso into … Corporation, however, contended that the Corporation was also a Public Sector Undertaking constituted under the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 and therefore the application of the Corporation ought to have been considered on a preferential basis and when … Authority regarding the grant of All India Tourist Vehicle Permits ('T.V. Permits' for short) under Sub-section (7) of Section 63 of the Motor Vehicles Act ('the Act' for short) two questions concerning the constitutional validity and the interpretation … Court in the case of Arunachala Nadar -v.- State of Madras, : AIR1959SC300 thus:'(5) Before we scrutinize the provisions of the Act, the law on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskVinaya Chandra Misra Vs. Sachindra Kumar Sarkar
Allahabad
Apr-10-1974
Criminal
1974CriLJ962
proceedings and take seisin of the matter is as be-fore. (Underlining is by us)13. The Constitution came into force in 1950 and by incorporating Article 215 therein the makers of the Constitution preserved to the High Court … 1952 or under Section 25 of the General Clauses Act, 1897, Sections 63 to 70 of the Penal Code and the relevant provisions of the … Court consisting of Walsh. Sulaiman and Boys, JJ. in case of Hadi Hussain v. Nasir Uddin Haider : AIR1926All623 . All the three Judges wrote separate but concurring judgments. The point was however dealt with at some … own Court. Placing reliance on Section 15 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, learned Counsel for the opposite party urged that this Court cannot
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-21-2000
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984
95(2002)DLT770
Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … the appellant in violation of all the rules. On. 27.7.1979 the appellant was orally conveyed tentative charges under Section 63 of the Army Act. On 10.8.1979 two tentative charges recording of Summary of Evidence. On 12.8.1979 at the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Joseph Shine Vs. Union Of India Secretary
Supreme Court of India
Jan-31-2023
Land Acquisition
of the Armed forces are subject to statutory provisions, viz., Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Acts’). (5) Our attention is further drawn to Article 33 of the Constitution which … to suffer such less punishment as is in this Act mentioned.” (8) She further draws our attention to Section 63: “63. Violation of good order and discipline. Any person subject to this Act 4 MA No.2204/2020 in W.P.(Crl.)
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAir Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...
Guwahati
Aug-17-2013
Education
records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … the said complaint implicated the petitioner and contained imputations, which impaired and damaged the reputation of the petitioner. 63. As indicated above, a bare perusal of the anonymous letter, in question, identify the petitioner as the person
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSukhdev Singh Gill Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-19-2000
Service
Punjab Government National Emergency (Concession) Rules, 1965 - Rule 2; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 4(1), 63, 73, 81(4), 113, 114 and 116(1); Constitution of India - Articles 33 and 352
[2000(87)FLR951]; 2000(7)SCALE259; (2000)8SCC492; [2000]Supp4SCR292; (2001)1UPLBEC664
Section 3(xi) of the Army Act which reads as follows:(xi) 'the Forces' means the regular Army, Navy and Air Force or any part of any one or more of them; 12. This Court also referred 7to Section 4(1) … considered the nature of the service in the G.R.E.F. and the applicability of certain provisions of the Army Act, 1950 for the purpose of taking disciplinary action against the Officers of the G.R.E.F. In that judgment this Court … Schedule 'B' of the Notification relates to certain amendments in Sections 3, 63, 73, 81(4), 113, 114 and 116(1) of the said Act. In the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalwant Singh Vs. Union of India and Others
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Chandigarh Bench Chandimandir
Jan-15-2014
Land Acquisition
as it is not a service matter, either under Army Act 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or Air Force Act 1950. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not propose to file the rejoinder/affidavit and the … were arrested in pursuance of the arrest warrants. They were charged before the Court Martial for offences under Section 63 of the Army Act. The Court Martial proceedings took place in accordance with the procedure prescribed by the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskRam Narayan Tiwari. Vs. Union of India and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Feb-21-2011
Air Force
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 157, 73
three months detention and reduction in rank was awarded to the appellant. As per the provisions of the Air Force Act, 1950 the aforesaid findings as well as the punishment were subject to confirmation by the Confirming Authority, consequently, the … was raised by the counsel, apparently on instructions from the appellant, was that in exercise of powers under Section 157 of the Air Force Act [for short "the Act"], the Confirming Authority could mitigate, remit or commute … is a lesser punishment than imprisonment as contemplated under Section 57 and 63 of the Army Act. In our considered opinion the ratio of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskA. Ram Mohan Vs. Labour Court, Bangalore and anr.
Karnataka
Dec-15-1988
Labour and Industrial
Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10, 10(1) and 25F
[1989(59)FLR1]; (1989)IILLJ179Kant
led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police … 1982 (annexure B in W.P. Nos. 10541 and 10542 of 1987). By the same order, the provisions of Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act were complied with, in that, the employee was paid one month's salary … and also the final award directing the payment of compensation of Rs. 63,000 in addition to the amounts already received by the workman. 2. As
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskNational Small Industries Corpn. Ltd. Vs. V. Lakshminarayanan
Supreme Court of India
Nov-10-2006
Labour and Industrial
Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 18 and 22; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 12B, 17B and 25F; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957
[2006(111)FLR1205]; JT2007(1)SC69; 2006(11)SCALE684; (2007)1SCC214; 2007(3)SLJ25(SC); 2006(2)LC1461(SC); 2006AIRSCW5927; 2007ILLJ571(SC)
led to that dispute, but does not include any such person -i ) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Altamas Kabir, J.1. Leave granted.2. The short point for decision in these appeals is whether in view of Section 18 of the Apprentices Act, 1961 (hereinafter called the '1961 Act') the 1st Addl. Labour Court, Chennai, was … with a direction upon the appellant to deposit a sum of Rs. 63,000/- before the Labour Court within 12 weeks and further directed that the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »