Advanced Search Results

Akhil G Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Kerala

Subject : Land Acquisition

subject to the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), meal all matters relating to the conditions of their service and shall include- (i) remuneration … the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in so far as going by the definition of “service matters” in Section 3(o), only over persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Tribunal will have jurisdiction and persons seeking

Hindustan Lever Limited Vs. Hindustam Lever Employees Union and B.S. B ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 3A, 9A, 10A(3A), 18, 19, 25F, 25G, 25O, 36, 36(1) and 38; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 - Rules 25 and 62; Constitution of India - Article 32; Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules; Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules; Revised Leave Rules; Civil Service Regulations; Civilians in Defence Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules; Indian Railway Establishment Code; Karnataka Industrial Rules - Rule 59

Reported in : (2006)ILLJ1119Bom

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 962 of … 2A, 18 and 36 of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and Rule 62 of the Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957. No determination of facts was … said unfair labour practice. iii) It is further declared that discontinuation of lines in Hard Soaps Department, a Section of Toilet Soaps Departments, Printing Department and the closure of E.P.C. (Machine Building) Department and the Sulphanation Department,

Balbir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 9, 72, 124 and 125; Leave Rules - Rule 9; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1973 - Sections 475; Army Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 325

Reported in : 1995(43)BLJR343; 1994(4)SCALE904; (1995)1SCC90; [1994]Supp5SCR422; 1995(1)LC275(SC)

- jurisdiction - Sections 302 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 72, 124 and 125 of Air Force Act, 1950, Section 475 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - … facilities by the State Government and sha ll also be entitled to reimbursement of his expense s. [64H;65A-B] Section 62 of the Juvenile Justice Act, 1986 empowe rs the State Government to make rules to carry out the

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, heirs and successors in so for … by Bhagwati, J. in Minerva Mill's case (of : 1980 (3) SCC 625) : (at p. 1820 of AIR 1980 SC 178), and is not … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the

Gajanan Gangaram Patil and Others Vs. M/S. Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (I) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … difficulties. 3 On 20 March, 2003, a Closure permission was granted by the State Government to NOCIL under Section 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the ID Act), but this was set aside by

Gajanan Gangaram Patil and Others Vs. M/S. Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (I) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … difficulties. 3 On 20 March, 2003, a Closure permission was granted by the State Government to NOCIL under Section 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the ID Act), but this was set aside by

Thankamma K vs Union of India

Court : Kerala

service matters are confined to the persons subject to the Army Act, 1950; the Navy Act,1957; and the Air Force Act, 1950. Section 2 of the Act deals with the applicability of the Act, which reads as follows; “2. Applicability of

Lt. Col. Vijaynath Jha Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. Section 2 deals with the applicability of the Act, which is to the following Act:- “2. Applicability of the

C.H. Kodand Rao Vs. Union of India through the AMC Centre and School R ...

Court : Chhattisgarh

Subject : Land Acquisition

subject to the Army Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), mean all matters relating to the conditions of their service and shall include- (i) remuneration … writ petition stands finally disposed off. No order as to cost(s). Constitution of India, 1950 Article 226 Army Act, 1950 Section 91(i) Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 Section 3, Section 14(2) Service Matter Deduction Commanding Officerexercise of power conferred

Union Of India Vs. Parashotam Dass

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

subject to the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), mean all matters relating to the conditions of their service and shall include- (i) remuneration … order of a court or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the Armed Forces. Secondly, Section 31 of the said Act states that an appeal to this Court would only lie if “a point