Advanced Search Results

S. Venkataraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Chief of the Air Staf ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC594

service, which is being challenged in this writ petition. The petitioner submitted representation under Section 26 of The Air Force Act, 1950, to the 3rd respondent through proper channel.4. The Airmen are assessed annually for true proficiency and character. In … confidential reports during the last five years will be considered. An airman who has secured an average of 60% or above marks in his assessment/confidential reports shall be eligible for grant of first extension of engagement subject

R. Suresh Babu Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

sent the petitioner to CH, AF, Bangalore in February 1996 which is gross violation of Section 47 of Air Force Act, 1950. 2(c)The petitioner got discharged from hospital as a normal case having no abnormality found, routed back to MTTI, … petitioner was accordingly discharged from service with effect from 26th November 2003. Although an airman is entitled for 60 days Annual Leave and 30 days Casual Leave, but during the course of instructions, the leave is restricted

Sergeant B. K. Mehta of 2305 Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

60 years, R/o. Village P.O. Dhanowali Tehsil and District Jallandhar amounting to culpable homicide punishable under Section 71 Air Force Act, 1950 R/w. Section 304A IPC, 1860 and further he had also committed civil offence by causing disappearance of the

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … 2 and pages of the files are also given in the written notes, some files containing more than 600 pages.131. A perusal of the counter affidavit filed by the respondents in all the cases give us an

Ex-signalman Shri Bhagwan Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through the Secreta ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 13(3), 14, 17, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23 to 25 and 27; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 22, 191, 191(2) and 192; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 12, 20, 21, 22, 165, 167, 173, 173A, 183, 185, 187 and 188; defense Service Regulation; Medical Services of the Armed Forces Medical, 1962; General Regulations - Sections 1; Service Pension and Gratuity Regulations - Sections 2 and 3; Disability Pensionary Awards Regulations - Sections 4; Special Pensionary Awards Regulations - Sections 5; Entitlement Rules, 1961 - Rule 7; Army/Air Force Act; Entitlement (Amendment) Rules, 1982; Customs Act, 1962; Central Excises Act, 1944

Reported in : 103(2003)DLT269; 2003(3)SLJ303(Delhi)

rank in the Army are the same for officers in the Army and for all personnel in the Air Force and Navy. thereforee, while the general principles that we have determined can be applied more or less uniformly, … Certain procedures have been laid down in various documents about which very few people seem to be aware.Army Act, 1950 13. Retirement, release or discharge of Army personnel is provided for in Section 22 of the Army Act, … service or aggravated thereby. The Medical Board had assessed his disability at 60%. On the basis of the decision of the Medical Board, the Respondent

Wg.Cdr. Manisha Krishnatri (Retd.) and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Acts : Air Force Act 1950 - Section 12

The Secretary & Anr. 2. The origin of the litigation could be traced to Section 12 of the Air Force Act 1950 which makes females ineligible for enrolment or employment in the Air Force, except in such corps, department, branch … despite satisfaction of the two terms and conditions." 16. Before terminating the decision by issuing directions, in para 60, the Division Bench observed as under:- "60. A PC carries with it certain privileges of rank including pension.

Sgt. Indera Bahadur Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Law

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ374

Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India.32. Mr. Narender Kaushik referred to Section 2 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Section 2 reads as under: -'Persons subject to this Act-The following persons shall be subject to this Act wherever … (1987)ILLJ522SC . 3. 'State of Haryana v. P.C.Wadhwa, IPS, Inspector General of Police & Another', (1987) 2 SCC 603. 4.'Vijay Kumar, LAS Vs . State of Maharashtra & Others', : AIR1988SC2060 . 5. 'Baidyanath Mahapatra Vs .

Jai Ganesh SRA CHS (Prop.) and Another Vs. State of Maharashtra and Ot ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Land Acquisition

salary in execution of any decree for maintenance; (j) the pay and allowance of persons to whom the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … property is so entitled to exemption shall be conclusive." 45. Since sub-section (1) of section 270 specifically refers section 60 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, we would have to refer to the same. That is reproduced

Glaxo India Ltd., a Pharmaceutical Company Vs. Mr. C. Gupta and Anothe ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 10(1) and 25; Indian Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 10 and 23; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Essential Commodities Act, 1955; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 92-A; Industrial Employment Standing Order Act, 1946; Factories Act, 1948; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 153; M.P. Industrial Relations Act

Reported in : 1999(2)ALLMR482; 1999(3)BomCR401; (1999)2BOMLR758; [1999(82)FLR389]; (1999)IILLJ718Bom; 1999(2)MhLj410

a consequence of, that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950 or theNavy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the police service … against that if he was a workman, his retirement age would be 60 and therefore he would be retiring only on 3-7-1999.5. The company by … employee was part of managerial staff and therefore he would not be a workman as per definition under section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. Needless to say, according to the employee, he is a workman

ibrahim Khan Vs. Secretary, Municipal Administration and Urban Develop ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Administrative Tribunal Act, 1985 - Sections 19; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2, 10, 74 and 75; Constitution of India - Article 226; Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Hyderabad Civil Service Rules - Rule 231; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD619; 2001(5)ALT400

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … thus he ought to have continued in service till the age of 60 years.3. The petitioner at the first instance approached the State Administrative Tribunal … or not under the Industrial Disputes Act can be effectively decided by the Tribunal in an application under Section 19 of the Administrative Tribunals Act.2. The petitioner worked as Vehicle Inspector in the Office of Municipal Corporation