Advanced Search Results

Wing Commander Rajiv Arora Vs. Union and India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 109, 40, 45, 47, 48, 65, 110, 129, 152 and 161(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 491; Air-Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24, 37, 37(3), 43, 43(4), 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 59, 113, 154 and 156; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(93)DRJ229

the said Court had assembled at Gandhinagar (Gujarat). With reference to the provisions of Section 152 of the Air Force Act, 1950, it is stated that no finding or sentence of a general, district or summary general court-martial shall be … this Court in the case of Wg Cdr B.D. Jena v. Union of India and Ors. CWP No 5907/2003 decided on 17th January, 2006, the bar having not been exhausted, alternative remedy to the very maintainability of

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Corporal Sharma A.K.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 150, 161, 161(1) and 161(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109 and 325; Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24 and 59

in its support. It is stated that by virtue of the provisions of Section 161 of the Indian Air Force Act, 1950, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1950', an appeal by way of representation was submitted by the petitioner … Martial proceedings started and the defence counsel sought for adjournment until 1-11-88 for raising special plea under Rule 59 of the Air Force Rules, 1969. On 1-11-88, the writ petitioner filed a petition before the District Court

Syed Muneer Raza Vs. Chairman, Railway Board, New Delhi and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : ContractConstitution

Acts : Railway Claims Tribunal Act, 1987 - Sections 13(1), 56, 59, 65, 72, 73, 78 and 142; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 21 and 226; Railways Act, 1989 - Sections 78, 79 and 105; IRCA - Rule 117; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 354; Railways Act, 1890 - Sections 78-B

Reported in : 2000(1)ALD689

with by the special provisions contained in the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act 1957 or the Air Force Act, 1950 and not by the normal Criminal Procedure Code. The said Navy Act is a complete code by itself … externment order, passed under Section 56, and the accused was not given an opportunity to tender explanation under Section 59 and there was disobedience of order and prosecution under Section 142 was launched. In those circumstances, the Supreme

Hindustan Lever Limited Vs. Hindustam Lever Employees Union and B.S. B ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 3A, 9A, 10A(3A), 18, 19, 25F, 25G, 25O, 36, 36(1) and 38; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 - Rules 25 and 62; Constitution of India - Article 32; Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules; Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules; Revised Leave Rules; Civil Service Regulations; Civilians in Defence Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules; Indian Railway Establishment Code; Karnataka Industrial Rules - Rule 59

Reported in : (2006)ILLJ1119Bom

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 962 of … the case of lock out. Interestingly, the learned Single Judge considered rule 59 of the Rules of Karnataka Industrial Rules, and held that the settlement … said unfair labour practice. iii) It is further declared that discontinuation of lines in Hard Soaps Department, a Section of Toilet Soaps Departments, Printing Department and the closure of E.P.C. (Machine Building) Department and the Sulphanation Department,

Gajanan Gangaram Patil and Others Vs. M/S. Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (I) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … (IT) No.22 of 2009; Reference (IT) No.26 of 2009; Reference (IT) No. 59 of 2009; Reference (IT) No. 67 of 2009;Reference (IT) No. 70 of … difficulties. 3 On 20 March, 2003, a Closure permission was granted by the State Government to NOCIL under Section 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the ID Act), but this was set aside by

C. Narayanaswamy and Others, Etc. Vs. State of Karnataka and Another

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16, 74(2), 123, 134A, 141, 174, 213, 226, 245 and 356(1); Karnataka Zilla Parishads, Taluk Panchayat Samithis, Mandal Panchayats and Nyaya Panchayats Act, 1983 - Sections 167, 169 and 170

Reported in : AIR1992Kant28; 1991(2)KarLJ58

Constitution and then quoted the decision of the Federal Court in Lakhi Narayan Das v. Province of Bihar AIR 1950 FC 59 and then concluded thus (at p. 731, Para 14 of AIR): 'While the courts can … the Constitution says that the Ordinance making power is legislative power and an ordinance shall have the same force as an Act, an ordinance should be clothed with all the attributes of an Act of legislature carrying … Upadhyaksha. They are to be the members of the concerned Zilla Parishad. Section 168 of the Act states that Adhyaksha shall be the executive head

Gajanan Gangaram Patil and Others Vs. M/S. Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (I) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … (IT) No.22 of 2009; Reference (IT) No.26 of 2009; Reference (IT) No. 59 of 2009; Reference (IT) No. 67 of 2009;Reference (IT) No. 70 of … difficulties. 3 On 20 March, 2003, a Closure permission was granted by the State Government to NOCIL under Section 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the ID Act), but this was set aside by

G. Basava Reddy Vs. Smt. K. Parvathamma and ors.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Civil

Acts : Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 47; Revenue Recovery Act - Sections 59; Andhra Pradesh Rent and Revenue Sales and The Madras Revenue Recovery (Andhra Pradesh Extension and Amendment) Act, 1958; States Reorganization Act; Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 21(1); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11 and 80; Constitution of India - Article 32 and 226; Andhra Pradesh Agricultural Lands (Prohibition of Alienation) Ordinance, 1972

Reported in : 2007(5)ALD730

suit. Since the confirmation of the sale was before the coming into force of the Ordinance and Act, the provisions of the Ordinance or Act … was held without obtaining permission of the Tahsildar under Section 47 of the Hyderabad Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 (the Hyderabad Tenancy Act). The writ petition was dismissed by the order dated 29-12-1967, holding that permission under … and after the dismissal of the earlier writ petitions it is hopelessly barred by time, because as per Section 59 of the Revenue Recovery Act, which is made applicable to Telangana area by virtue of the Andhra Pradesh … U.P. State Road Transport Corporation v. State of U.P. and Anr. : AIR2005SC446 , Forward Construction Co. and Ors. v. Prabhat Mandal (Regd.), Andheri and

Sugreev Singh Desuriya Vs. Central Government of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 73 and 82; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 15

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1442

or under Section 82 against the appellant-writ petitioner. If it has been proceeded under Section 82 of the Air Force Act, 1950. it cannot be said that the minor punishment awarded to the appellant-writ petitioner is without jurisdiction.17. In view … duty at 7.00 hrs. on27.5.1987 and reported back to duty at 7.00 hrs, on 28.5.1987 Total absence23 hrs. 59 mts. (Black ink).Reprimand1.11.1987Failed to book in/in the Airmen book out/inRegister at 2359 on 1.11.1987. Till he booked al

Security Printing Corporation Of India Ltd And Ors Etc. Vs. Vijay D. K ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

led to that dispute, but does not Union; include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … any overtime allowance. (v) In the year 1988, a group of eight persons working as Supervisors, Works Engineer, Section Officer, etc., in the Currency Note Press, Nashik, filed a writ petition on the file of the High … therein were entitled to Double Over Time Allowance in terms of Section 59(1) of the 1948 Act. After holding so, the Tribunal confined the relief,