Advanced Search Results

M.S. Brar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 27

Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)611; 96(2002)DLT483

granted the extension of service. Against this communication the petitioner submitted a petition under Section 27 of the Air Force Act 1950 (for short the Act) on 20 March 2000, raising the following objections to the denial of extension, to … Air Head Quarters that he he has not been granted extension of service up to the age of 58 years in terms of Government of India, Ministry of defense letter dated 4 September 1998. 4. The retiring

Avm M.S. Brar, Avsm, Vm Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2004SC5141; 2004(4)AWC3085(SC); 113(2004)DLT514(SC); JT2004(7)SC148; 2004(7)SCALE410; (2004)12SCC114; (2004)3UPLBEC2641

rank of Air Marshal. Against this denial the appellant submitted a statutory application under Section 27 of the Air Force Act, 1950. The appellant also filed Civil Writ Petition No. 3242 of 2001 against the denial of extension of service … Air Vice Marshal was 56 years extendable upto 57 years. Later, it was raised to 57 years and 58 years respectively. According to the appellant, he had outstanding flying performance and was awarded Vayu Sewa Medal in

Air Marshal Amarjeet Singh Sethi Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 7(2), 58(1) and 191

Reported in : 1999(3)KarLJ336

the reason the same is not published in the Official Gazette as required under Section 191 of the Air Force Act, 1950, which governs the service conditions of the petitioner. Therefore, a request is made to declare that the impugned … case where Central Board of Directors of Reserve Bank had not framed staff regulations exercising their powers under Section 58(1) of the Act but had issued administrative directions and circulars for regulating service conditions. When the efficacy of

Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank Retired Employees Association and or ...

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 12, 12(4), 18, 18(1), 33C(2) and 36; ;West Bengal Societies Registration Act, 1961; ;Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Section 22; ;Working Journalists (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955 - Section 2; ;Air Force Act, 1950; ;Army Act, 1950; ;Navy Act, 1957; ;Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957 - Rule 58

Reported in : 2007(2)CHN66,(2007)2LLJ887Cal

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person--(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) read with Rule 58 of the Industrial Disputes (Central) Rules, 1957 between the ANZ Grindlays Bank … as the Standard Chartered Grindlays Bank.3. On the basis of a settlement entered on November 20, 1997 under Section 2(b) read with Section 18(1) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act)

Debi Singh and ors. Vs. Jagdish Saran Singh and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : PropertyCivil

Acts : Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 58; Transfer of Property (Amendment) Act, 1929; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908

Reported in : AIR1952All716

(c) of Section 58 of the Transfer of Property Act came into force, contains any one of the three conditions mentioned in that clause, is … SINGH v. JAGDISH BAKHSH SINGH', 17 Luck 198: (AIR 1941 Oudh 582); 'BISHAN LAL v. BANWARI LAL' : AIR1937All724 , which was affirmed in appeal in 'BISHAN LAL v. BANWARI LAL' : AIR1939All713 and THAKRA SINGH v. … 'MT. QAIYUMUNNISA v. RASHI-DUL MALIK', Appln. No. 9 of 1949, 13th October 1950: : AIR1952All200 , by a Bench of this Court of which one … and out sale subject to a condition of repurchase within a specified time. The Special Judge held that Section 58(c) of the Transfer of Property Act when correctly construed does not indicate that every deed of sale containing

State of U.P. Thru Secy. Lucknow Vs. Jagdish Chandra

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Land Acquisition

Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950. There was a saving clause in the Act, 1950 namely:sub-section (3) of Section 58 which provided as follows: "The repeal by this Act of the Administration of Evacuee Property Ordinance 1949 or … repeal." The Apex Court in Mohan Raj Vs. Dimbeswari Saikia and Anr, AIR 2007, SC 232, has quoted the above passage with approval in paragraph … State Government in this behalf and may for that purpose use such force as may be necessary. Explanation.- In this section, in sub- section (1) … Court examined the provisions of Section 6 of the Act, 1897 in context of Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950. By order dated October, 12, 1949, the Deputy Custodian of Evacuee Property, Lucknow declared No. 11, Kaiserbagh as

Banshidhar and ors. Vs. State

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Rajasthan Imposition of Ceiling on Agricultural Holding Act, 1973 - Sections 15, 15(2) and 40; Rajasthan Tenancy Act, 1955 - Sections 30E, 30E(1) and 30E(2); Rajasthan General Clauses Act, 1955 - Sections 6

Reported in : AIR1977Raj46

AIR 1966 SC 573. In that case Section 58 (3) was introduced in the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950. While dealing with the scope of Section 58 (3) in the background of the provisions of Section 6 … Ceiling on Agricultural Holdings Act, 1973 (Act No. 11 of 1973) (hereinafter called the 'new Law.) came into force, be governed by the old Law and the new Law shall have no effect on such proceedings. Having

Guru Narayanprasad and ors. Vs. Pt. Kedarnath Vishweshwarprasadji

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 240, 246(4) and 254; Government of Part C States Act, 1951 - Sections 21 and 22; Vindhya Pradesh Abolition of Jagirs and Land Reforms Act, 1952 - Sections 6, 6(1) and 6(2); Transfer of Property Act, 1882 - Sections 58 and 68; Part C States (Laws) Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1961MP216

Commissioner of Vindhya Pradesh in Mordhwaj Singh v. State of Vindhya Pradesh, AIR 1954 Vindh Pra 24. He held that the Abolition Act was valid, … which provides for the extension to the State of any law in force in. ......... any other part of the territory of India.' In 1954, … in the Transfer of Property Act which was extended to Vindhya Pradesh by the Part C States (Laws) Act, 1950 (No. XXX of 1950) and, therefore, they are void; and, (ii) That under Section 6 of the Abolition … That brings us to the question whether there is repugnancy between Section 6 of the Abolition Act and Section 58 of the Transfer of Property Act. The tests of repugnancy as laid down in Deepchand v. State of

Shri Sai Bhakta Samaj (Regd.) Vs. Shri Durga Prasad and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Societies Registration Act; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 133(2006)DLT132; [2006(111)FLR814]

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person -(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Pujari respectively. They were retired by the management at the age of 58 years after payment of all dues as applicable under law. They challenged … is that one of the workman is a Pujari. He has been held as a workman unmindful of Section 2(s) of I.D. Act. Section 2(s) of the Act reads as under:(s) 'workman' means any person (including an

S. Venkataraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Chief of the Air Staf ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC594

service, which is being challenged in this writ petition. The petitioner submitted representation under Section 26 of The Air Force Act, 1950, to the 3rd respondent through proper channel.4. The Airmen are assessed annually for true proficiency and character. In