Advanced Search Results

Mrs. Pramila Nesargi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 3; ;Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937 - Rules 5(1), 14(3) and 14(5); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52 and 57

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1810

229 of the Constitution of India and is therefore, void and unenforceable in law.27. Section 45 of the Air Force Act, 1950 provides for punishment for the officer governed by the Act who behave in a manner unbecoming of his … the intent to defraud, or to cause wrongful gain to one person or wrongful loss to another person. Section 57 of the Act has declared the act of falsifying official documents and false declarations to be an offence.

Rajiv Arora Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 40, 45, 47, 48 and 65; Evidence Act; Air Force Rules - Rules 43, 43(3) and 57

Reported in : AIR2009SC1100; JT2008(9)SC499; 2008(12)SCALE90; 2009(1)SLJ98(SC)

Assistant of HeadquarterSouth Western Air Command, Indian Air Force and behaved in a riotous manner.SEVENTH CHARGE SECTION 47 AIR FORCE ACT, 1950 (ALTERNATIVE TO SIXTH CHARGE)ILL TREATING A PERSON SUBJECT TO THE AIR FORCEACT BEING HIS SUBORDINATE IN RANKIn that … of court-martial shall then be sent to the senior officer of court-martial and the Judge Advocate, if appointed.Rule 57 of the Rules enables the accused to object to the charge, inter alia, on the ground that it

Ram Narayan Tiwari. Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Air Force

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 157, 73

three months detention and reduction in rank was awarded to the appellant. As per the provisions of the Air Force Act, 1950 the aforesaid findings as well as the punishment were subject to confirmation by the Confirming Authority, consequently, the … 1950 as one of the punishments according to scale is a lesser punishment than imprisonment as contemplated under Section 57 and 63 of the Army Act. In our considered opinion the ratio of the aforesaid decision squarely applies

Sq Ldr C. Singh Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Jaipur

Subject : MRTP

and hence could not be promoted to the next rank after retirement. 11. As regards the applicability of Air Force Act, 1950, Sec. 26 of the Reserve and Auxiliary Air Force Act,1952 lays down the conditions of applicability. It clearly … 14.1.2000 on completion of 12 years service. On attaining the age of 57 years, the applicant was superannuated from Indian Air Force on 31.8.2004 and … the rank of Wing Commander and consequential retrial benefits. The writ petition was transferred to this Tribunal under Sec.34 of the Armed Forces Tribunals Act, 2007 and the same has been registered as Transfer Application No. 144

M.S. Brar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 27

Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)611; 96(2002)DLT483

granted the extension of service. Against this communication the petitioner submitted a petition under Section 27 of the Air Force Act 1950 (for short the Act) on 20 March 2000, raising the following objections to the denial of extension, to … Force officers (Flying Branch) of the rank of Air Vice Marshal used to be 56 years, extendable to 57 years. Pursuant to the recommendations of the 5th Central Pay Commission and general policy of the Government, the

State Vs. Gokulchand

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Essential Supplies (Temporary Powers) Act, 1946 - Sections 4 and 11; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 3(2); Constitution of India - Articles 366 and 372

Reported in : AIR1957MP145

was not duly proved. This rendered the prosecution unsustainable as was held in State v. Brij Lal Dhodi, AIR 1953 Madh-B 30 (A), Pannalal v. The State, 1952 Madh-B LJ 329: (AIR 1953 Madh B 84) (B) … Chief Commissioner's Province be exercised by the Chief Commissioner. On 17th March 1950 the Chief Commissioner of Ajmer, purporting to act as the 'appropriate' Government … Court cannot take judicial notice of this 'law in force in the territory of India' in accordance with Section 57(1) of the Indian Evidence Act.16. The Pull-Bench of Madhya Bharat High Court take reliance upon the aforesaid Supreme

Sgt. Indera Bahadur Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Law

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ374

Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India.32. Mr. Narender Kaushik referred to Section 2 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Section 2 reads as under: -'Persons subject to this Act-The following persons shall be subject to this Act wherever … of India on the 30th of May, 1998, airmen are entitled to serve up to the age of 57 years, though earlier, according to the petitioner, the age of retirement was fixed at 55 years. In March,

Kush Kalra vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Air Force and Navy. We find that Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950; Section 12 of the Air Force Act, 1950 as well as Section 9 of the Indian Navy Act, 1957 contain specific and express provisions excluding women

Avm M.S. Brar, Avsm, Vm Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2004SC5141; 2004(4)AWC3085(SC); 113(2004)DLT514(SC); JT2004(7)SC148; 2004(7)SCALE410; (2004)12SCC114; (2004)3UPLBEC2641

rank of Air Marshal. Against this denial the appellant submitted a statutory application under Section 27 of the Air Force Act, 1950. The appellant also filed Civil Writ Petition No. 3242 of 2001 against the denial of extension of service … The retiring age of the officers of the rank of Air Vice Marshal was 56 years extendable upto 57 years. Later, it was raised to 57 years and 58 years respectively. According to the appellant, he had

S. Venkataraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Chief of the Air Staf ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC594

service, which is being challenged in this writ petition. The petitioner submitted representation under Section 26 of The Air Force Act, 1950, to the 3rd respondent through proper channel.4. The Airmen are assessed annually for true proficiency and character. In … has no right to compel the respondents to engage him for an indefinite period or till he completes 57/58 years, the reliance placed on the reports by the respondents in no manner violate the principles of nature