Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 53 · Page 1 of about 944 results (0.088 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 26 2000

Ram Naraian Tiwari Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Jul-26-2000

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 46, 71, 152, 157, 161 and 161(1) and (2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 43, 43(1) and (2) and 53(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 377

Reported in : 2000(3)AWC2506; (2000)3UPLBEC2217

sentence of court martial is not valid unless it is confirmed in view of Section 152 of the Air Force Act. 1950. Under Section 157, the confirming authority has the power to mitigate, remit or commute the sentence, which is … for being tried by the description of such court martial and thus hit by sub-rule (2) of Rule 53.6. Mr. Sisir Kumar, learned counsel for the respondents, on the other hand contends that this question was assailed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2006

Wing Commander Rajiv Arora Vs. Union and India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-16-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 109, 40, 45, 47, 48, 65, 110, 129, 152 and 161(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 491; Air-Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24, 37, 37(3), 43, 43(4), 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 59, 113, 154 and 156; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(93)DRJ229

the said Court had assembled at Gandhinagar (Gujarat). With reference to the provisions of Section 152 of the Air Force Act, 1950, it is stated that no finding or sentence of a general, district or summary general court-martial shall be … objection to the constitution of the court and thereafter the Court Was duly sworn in as per Rules 53 and 54 of Air Force Rules, 1969. The petitioner was given all kinds of help and he was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2000

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … and found guilty based on confession as well asstatement made by Capt. R.S. Rathoreimplicating himself and the petitioner. 53. The case of the appellant and the cases of other officers are inter connected and intertwined and they

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 17 2013

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-17-2013

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … up by issuance of executive instructions has not been disputed by the respondents at the time of hearing. 53. In a situation, such as the present one, it is not only difficult but impossible not to hold,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 02 1980

Ashok Leyland Limited Vs. A. Vijayakumar and anr.

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Dec-02-1980

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Article 226; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Madras Shops and Establishments Act - Sections 4(1)

Reported in : (1981)IILLJ9Mad

does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934 or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an … of Labour, : (1959)IILLJ771Mad and Prem Sagar v. S.V.O.C., : (1964)ILLJ47SC at 53. In this case, not one of the tests could be applied effectively … whether the first respondent is a workman within the meaning of S. 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act Section 2(s) of the Act contains the following definition : 'Workman means any person (including an apprentice) employed in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 23 2007

Tourism Corporation of Gujarat Ltd. Vs. Kalu Valji Jethwa

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Nov-23-2007

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Companies Act, 1956; Working Journalists and other Newspaper Employees (Conditions of Service and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1955; Minimum Wages Act, 1948; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2(9), 2(14), 17B, 25C, 25F and 79; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Factories Act, 1948 - Sections 2(1), 51, 51(1), 51(2), 52, 53 and 55; Payment of Bonus Act, 1965; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Workmen's Compensation Act, 1923; Employees' Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952; Employees State Insurance Act, 1949; Employees' State Insurance Act, 1948; Apprentices Act, 1961; Bombay Shops and Establishments Act, 1948; Payment of Wages Act, 1936; Constitution of India - Article 311

Reported in : [2008(117)FLR408]; (2008)1GLR12; (2008)ILLJ985Guj; 2009(2)SLJ37(NULL); 2008(2)AIRKarR227(FB)(Guj)

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person -[i] who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … shift which extends beyond midnight-(a) for the purpose of Sections 52 and 53, a holiday or a whole day shall mean in his case a … Appellant Corporation3. Based on statutory provisions 3.1 On behalf of the appellants it is submitted that as per Section 2(s) of the Act, a 'workman' only means a person appointed on full-time basis and would not include

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 26 1963

Chandulal Jethalal Jayaswal and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and anr.

Court : Gujarat

Decided on : Aug-26-1963

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India- Articles 19, 265, 301 and 304; Bombay Prohabition Act - Sections 2, 59C and 59D; Gujarat Denatured Spirituous Preparations Rules, 1962 - Rules 22 and 37

Reported in : AIR1964Guj59; (1963)GLR1033

the Gujarat Denatured Spirituous Preparations Rules, 1962. These rules were brought into force with effect from June 1, 1962. They purport to impose certain restrictions … (b) of the Indian Criminal Law Amendment Act, 1908, as amended by the Indian Criminal Law Amendment (Madras) Act, 1950, stated that the formula of subjective satisfaction of the Government or of its officers with an Advisory Body … a vend fee, was really fee for import passes which the State Government was unfitted to levy under Section 53 of the Act. But he had to concede that the cess was neither set apart as a separate … the Bombay High Court in F.N. Balsara v. State of Bombay : AIR1951Bom210 , where that High Court held that Item No. 31 in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2012

Mrs. Vanmala Manoharrao Kamdi and Others Vs. the Deputy Charity Commis ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : May-04-2012

Subject : Education

our attention to the statement of objects and reasons so also Sections 53 to 56 B of the B.P.T. Act, 1950. With his assistance we … (11) 2011(1) Bom.C.R. 486 (Sambhaji Raje Sadashiv Dahatonde and another ..Versus. State of Maharashtra and others). (12) 2011(1) AIR Bom. R. 750 (Nagpur Bench) (Murlidhar Janrao Kale and others..Versus.. State of Maharashtra and others). (13) AIR (87) … When the rights of the parties are adjudicated, there is a binding force to such orders they cannot be termed as administrative orders nor Section … for the appellant in Letters Patent Appeal No.368/2011 made the following submissions : (i) The Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 was enacted to regulate and make better provisions for the administration of public religious and charitable Trusts in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 20 2005

Secretary, O.N.G.C. Ltd. and anr. Vs. V.U. Warrier

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Apr-20-2005

Subject : ServiceCivil

Acts : Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants) Act, 1971; Oil and Natural Gas Commission Act, 1959 - Sections 32; Oil and Natural Gas Commission (Transfer of Undertaking and Repeal) Act, 1993; Commission's Death-Cum- Retirement Payment of Gratuity Regulations, 1969 - Regulation 5; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 2; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 3 and 9; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : AIR2005SC3039; 2005(5)BomCR251; [2005(106)FLR63]; JT2005(4)SC489; (2005)IILLJ1040SC; 2005(2)MhLj985; (2005)5SCC245; 2005(2)SLJ486(SC); 2005(2)LC1023(SC)

holds a civil post under the Central Government or a State Government, or who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957.' (emphasis supplied)23. From the above definition, it is clear … case of the Commission that the Commission is having a statutory status. In exercise of statutory powers under Section 32(1) of the Act, regulations known as the Oil and Natural Gas Commission (Death. Retirement and Terminal Gratuity) … towards payment of gratuity. The Commission, however, deducted an amount of Rs. 53,632/- towards unauthorized occupation charges of official accommodation from July 01, 1990 to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2011

Wg.Cdr. Manisha Krishnatri (Retd.) and ors. Vs. Uoi and ors

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Aug-11-2011

Subject : Education

Acts : Air Force Act 1950 - Section 12

The Secretary & Anr. 2. The origin of the litigation could be traced to Section 12 of the Air Force Act 1950 which makes females ineligible for enrolment or employment in the Air Force, except in such corps, department, branch … officers of grant of PC depending upon two factors, which are: i. Vacancy ii. Suitability of the officers. 53. The officers thus joined the Air Force on the promise of these terms of their recruitment apart from

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial