Advanced Search Results

Wing Commander Rajiv Arora Vs. Union and India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 109, 40, 45, 47, 48, 65, 110, 129, 152 and 161(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 491; Air-Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24, 37, 37(3), 43, 43(4), 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 59, 113, 154 and 156; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(93)DRJ229

the said Court had assembled at Gandhinagar (Gujarat). With reference to the provisions of Section 152 of the Air Force Act, 1950, it is stated that no finding or sentence of a general, district or summary general court-martial shall be … Dependra Pathak Deputy Commissioner of Police, South. West District, New Delhi and behaved in a riotous manner.THIRD CHARGESECTION 48 AIRFORCE ACT, 1959INTOXICATIONIn that, he, at New Delhi on the night of 28/29 Apr 05, was found in

Rajiv Arora Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 40, 45, 47, 48 and 65; Evidence Act; Air Force Rules - Rules 43, 43(3) and 57

Reported in : AIR2009SC1100; JT2008(9)SC499; 2008(12)SCALE90; 2009(1)SLJ98(SC)

Assistant of HeadquarterSouth Western Air Command, Indian Air Force and behaved in a riotous manner.SEVENTH CHARGE SECTION 47 AIR FORCE ACT, 1950 (ALTERNATIVE TO SIXTH CHARGE)ILL TREATING A PERSON SUBJECT TO THE AIR FORCEACT BEING HIS SUBORDINATE IN RANKIn that … Sh. Dependra Pathak, Deputy Commissioner of Police,South West District, New Delhi and behaved in a riotous manner.THIRD CHARGE SECTION 48 AIR FORCE ACT, 1950INTOXICATIONIn that heAT New Delhi on the night of 28/29 Apr 05, was foundin a

Chandrasekharasharma Vs. C. Krishnaiah Chetty

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Constitution Of India - Articles 226, 227; Industrial Disputes Act - Section 3, 1947 - Sections 10(1)(c), 2(s), 2(oo)(bb), 2(b), 2(rr); andhra pradesh Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 - section 48(1); Sales Act - Section 1(4); Dock Workers Act 1948 - Section 5A; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 ; Workmen's Compensation Act. 1923; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947; Minimum Wages Act, 1948 Maternity Benefit Act, 1961; Payment of Bonus Act. 1965; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Navy Act 1934; Plantation Labour Act, 1951 - Section 2; Industrial Disputes (ID) Act; Amending Act 1982;

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person -(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950, (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … in full and final settlement of accounts. Petitioner was also informed that this action was in accordance with section 2(oo)(bb) of Industrial Disputes Act. Aggrieved by the said action petitioner raised a dispute before the Labour Commissioner … Court in the case of SPIC Pharmaceuticals Division Versus Authority under Section 48(1) of A.P. Shops and Establishments Act, 1988 and another reported in (2007)

S. Sundarajan Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 141 and 226; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 491; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 189; Air Force Rules, 1950 - Rules 14, 15 and 48(B)

Reported in : AIR1970Delhi29; 1970CriLJ213; 6(1970)DLT1; AIR 1970 Del 29

Matched in: Citation AIR1970Delhi29; 1970CriLJ213; 6(1970)DLT1; AIR 1970 Del 29

S. Venkataraman Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Rep. by Chief of the Air Staf ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2003(1)CTC594

service, which is being challenged in this writ petition. The petitioner submitted representation under Section 26 of The Air Force Act, 1950, to the 3rd respondent through proper channel.4. The Airmen are assessed annually for true proficiency and character. In

Shyamabai Wd/O Surajkaran Joshi and ors. Vs. Madan Mohan Mandir Sansth ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Trusts and Societies

Acts : Indian Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 1, 19, 20, 47, 48 and 83; Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 - Sections 2(13) and 2(20); Societies Registration Act, 1860 - Sections 6; Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - Sections 19(1) and 129; Transfer of Property Act; Land Acquisition Act, 1894; Bombay Public Trusts Rules, 1951 - Rule 8; Constitution of India - Article 141

Reported in : 2010(1)BomCR294

down by the Full Bench of Gujarat High Court in Atmaram Ranchhodbhai v. Gulamhusein Gulam Mohiyaddin and Anr. AIR 1973 Guj 113 is also not a good law on the subject and the law laid down by … of Sarda Education Trust (cited supra) was holding field and was in force, there was no occasion for making a reference to the larger Bench … public trust on the strength of definition of Public Trust under Section 2(13) of the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 ?Similarly, Justice C.L. Pangarkar, in view of conflicting decisions, also referred following issues to the larger Bench for … following questions for determination to the Full Bench:(i) Whether Sections 47 and 48 of the Indian Trusts Act, 1882 are applicable to a Public Trust

Commander Vinod Kumar Jha Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

show cause notice was given to him and he was also dismissed from service u/s 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 and u/s 16 of Air Force Rules, 1969, for act of misconduct as brought out in the Court … petitioner and took him for interrogation. He was detained for more than 48 hours and he alleged that he was maltreated and was also physically … the interest of the state. Accordingly, the petitioner was dismissed from service in exercise of its powers of Section 15 of the Navy Act, 1957 read with Regulation 216. An affidavit was also filed by the Chief

Rullia Ram Hakim Rai Vs. S. Fateh Singh S. Sham Sher Singh

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Tenancy

Acts : Administration of Evacuee Property Act; Estate Punjab Urban Rent Registration Act, 1949 - Sections 13(2); Transfer of Property Act - Sections 114; Indian Limitation Act - Sections 28; Indian Companies Act; Delhi Rent Restriction Act

Reported in : AIR1962P& H256

the decisions of this Court and other High Courts on Section 48 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 in support of his contention. Section 48 is in these terms:'Any sum due to the State Government or … point is that of the Madras High Court in Vasudeva Udpa v. Krishna Udpa, ILR 44 Mad 629: AIR 1921 Mad 418. The latest decision of the Madras High Court is Gurupur Vamana Pai v. Venkatu, AIR … due.' This Act was amended in the year 1958 and came into force early in 1959. In the amending Act, the corresponding provision is contained

Meherabanoo GulamhussaIn Vadivala Vs. the Union of India

Court : Gujarat

Subject : Property

Acts : Displaced Persons (Compensation and Rehabilitation) Act, 1954 - Sections 21(1), 21(2) and 21(3)

Reported in : AIR1980Guj35; (1979)2GLR84

in their operation and not retrospective. Mr. Mehta relied on Bansidhar Lal v. Assistant Custodian, Evacuee Property Sasaram. AIR 1960 Pat 306. While considering the effect of amendment of Section 48 by Act 91 of 1956, the … property under this Act, which has not been recovered under Section 48 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 (31 of 1950), and any sum payable to the compensation pool, may be recovered in the same manner … is clear, therefore, that on the date the amending Act came into force the right of the certificate authorities to proceed against the petitioner for

Sgt. Indera Bahadur Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Law

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ374

Articles 14 & 16 of the Constitution of India.32. Mr. Narender Kaushik referred to Section 2 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Section 2 reads as under: -'Persons subject to this Act-The following persons shall be subject to this Act wherever … upon the judgment of the Allahabad High Court in 'Squadron Leader Girt Narayana Raju Vs . Officer Commanding 48 Squadron & Others', : AIR1974All362 . I do not deem it necessary to refer to the same in