Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 45 · Page 1 of about 1,465 results (0.119 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 20 1996

Mrs. Pramila Nesargi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Nov-20-1996

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 3; ;Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937 - Rules 5(1), 14(3) and 14(5); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52 and 57

Reported in : ILR1997KAR1810

229 of the Constitution of India and is therefore, void and unenforceable in law.27. Section 45 of the Air Force Act, 1950 provides for punishment for the officer governed by the Act who behave in a manner unbecoming of his

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 2006

Wing Commander Rajiv Arora Vs. Union and India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-16-2006

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 109, 40, 45, 47, 48, 65, 110, 129, 152 and 161(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 491; Air-Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24, 37, 37(3), 43, 43(4), 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 59, 113, 154 and 156; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(93)DRJ229

Court cannot act as appellate Court--Writ petition, rejected. - - 05, used offensive language to Sh. SIXTH CHARGE SECTION 45 AIR FORCE ACT, 1950 BEHAVING IN A MANNER UNBECOMING THE POSITION AND CHARACTER OF AN OFFICER In that … the said Court had assembled at Gandhinagar (Gujarat). With reference to the provisions of Section 152 of the Air Force Act, 1950, it is stated that no finding or sentence of a general, district or summary general court-martial shall be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 13 2002

Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Vs. E ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 20(7), 65 and 71; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 18, 18(1), 24, 24(4) and 36; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 45; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(3) and 14(4)

Reported in : 101(2002)DLT267; 2003(1)SLJ171(Delhi)

On April 27, 1995, charges were framed against the respondent. He was charged under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950, for having used criminal force to a woman with the intention to outrage her modesty. The respondent was … 1950, read with Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954 without being tried by a Court Martial under Section 45 of the Army Act, which specifically deals with the subject of unbecoming conduct of an officer. Before we

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Aug 29 2008

Rajiv Arora Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Aug-29-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 40, 45, 47, 48 and 65; Evidence Act; Air Force Rules - Rules 43, 43(3) and 57

Reported in : AIR2009SC1100; JT2008(9)SC499; 2008(12)SCALE90; 2009(1)SLJ98(SC)

Assistant of HeadquarterSouth Western Air Command, Indian Air Force and behaved in a riotous manner.SEVENTH CHARGE SECTION 47 AIR FORCE ACT, 1950 (ALTERNATIVE TO SIXTH CHARGE)ILL TREATING A PERSON SUBJECT TO THE AIR FORCEACT BEING HIS SUBORDINATE IN RANKIn that … Singhania to Head ConstableRanbir and Constable Dharmendeer, Police Personnel of Delhi Police, knowingsuch statement to be false.SECOND CHARGE SECTION 45 AIR FORCE ACT, 1950BEHAVING IN A MANNER UNBECOMING THE POSITION ANDCHARACTER OF AN OFFICERIn that he,At New Delhi

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2005

M.M. Malhotra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-04-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act 1950 - Sections 19, 45 and 191(2); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 45, 46 and 191(5); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 5, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3) and 16; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16 and 16(4); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 1 to 4, 14 and 16(4); Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR2006SC80; 2006(1)BomCR661; [2005(107)FLR1006]; JT2005(9)SC506; 2006(1)MhLj1; 2006MPLJ1(SC); 2005(8)SCALE202; (2005)8SCC351; 2006(1)SLJ303(SC)

upon to show-cause as to why he should not be dismissed/removed from service under Section 19 of the Air Force Act; 1950 (in short the 'Act') read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969. The charges leveled in … of criminal force against a woman is an act unbecoming of an officer and is an offence under Section 45 of the Act. The said provision reads as follows:'45. Unbecoming Conduct: Any Officer or Warrant Officer who behaves

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 31 2012

Akhil G Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jan-31-2012

Subject : Land Acquisition

subject to the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), meal all matters relating to the conditions of their service and shall include- (i) remuneration … the Tribunal does not have jurisdiction in so far as going by the definition of “service matters” in Section 3(o), only over persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Tribunal will have jurisdiction and persons seeking

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jun 07 2024

Vasudevan Namboodiri vs State of Kerala

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Jun-07-2024

of the Army Act, 1950, Section 69 of the Navy Act and Sections 45 and 65 of the Air Force Act, the declaration of Section 497 of IPC and Section 198 of Cr.PC as unconstitutional, is the binding precedent

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 25 2010

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Feb-25-2010

Subject : Criminal

would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, heirs and successors in so for … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the … of S.P. Sampath Kumar v. Union of India : 1985 (4) SCC 458 directed to carry out certain measures with a view to ensure the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 12 2009

Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation and anr. Vs. Bal Mukund Bai ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Jan-12-2009

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Road Transport Corporations Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 10, 19 and 45; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 10, 11, 11A, 25F, 25G, 25H and 33C; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946 - Sections 3; Rajasthan State Road Transport Workers and Workshop Employees Standing Orders, 1965 - Order 4; Limitation Act; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Parliamentary Act; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14(1); Constitution of India - Articles 12, 14, 254, 309 and 311(2); Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) - Sections 9; Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation Employees Service Regulations, 1965

Reported in : 2009(4)AWC3503(SC); [2009(121)FLR603]; (2009)IIILLJ177SC; (2009)5MLJ307(SC); RLW2009(1)SC452; 2009(2)SCALE428; (2009)4SCC299:2009AIRSCW2566

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who in subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … corporate having perpetual succession and a common seal and can in its own name sue and be sued. Section 45 of the 1950 Act provides for the Regulation making power, stating:45. Power to make regulations.- (1) A Corporation

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 05 2007

Harikant Ramnarayan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Apr-05-2007

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125, 126 and 126(1); Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Criminal Code and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 4 and 5; Air Force Law; Army Rules - Rule 125

Reported in : 2007(5)MhLj419

Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time … cognizance thereof has already been taken by the competent Criminal Court, whether the Officer Commanding in view of Section 125 of the Army Act is legally entitled to make a request to the Criminal Court to hand

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial