Advanced Search Results

Ex. Lac Gk Singh (656393), Trade – Med/Asst Vs. Union of India, M ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Subject : Land Acquisition

tried by the District Court Martial for two charges. The first charge was under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950 for committing a civil offence, that is to say, using criminal force to a woman intending to outrage … the offence under section 65 of the Air Force Act was not made out. Only the offence under section 42(e) could be said to have been made out if the case is treated as correct. Therefore, conviction of

Lekh Raj Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Excise

Reported in : 1987(1)WLN774

Bal Mukund ILR 1974 (24) Raj. 510, Panna Lal and Ors. etc. v. State of Rajasthan and Ors. AIR 1975 SC 2806, Har Shanker and Ors. etc. etc. v. The Deputy Excise and Taxation Commissioner and Ors. … therefore, propose to examine the validity of the notification dated the 25th May, 1905 on merits.;(c) Rajasthan Excise Act. 1950 - Section 42(a) & (e) and Rajasthan issue & Sale prices of Country Liquor Rules, 1964--Rule making power 'sustaining in … contract. By such a test no contract could ever have a binding force.'xxx xxx xxx xxx xxxThe licences, in a large measure, owe their existence

Sergeant B. K. Mehta of 2305 Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

60 years, R/o. Village P.O. Dhanowali Tehsil and District Jallandhar amounting to culpable homicide punishable under Section 71 Air Force Act, 1950 R/w. Section 304A IPC, 1860 and further he had also committed civil offence by causing disappearance of the … 64 and 65 of the Air Force Act. Further he was also charged for the offences under Section 42(e) of the Air Force Act, 1950 for not complying the orders of the superior officers for keeping the

Gajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 47, 47(1), 80, 81 and 141(2); Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 323 and 452; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 41, 41(1) and 42; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 192, 439 and 475; Criminal Courts and Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 and 4; Constitution of India; Air Force Law

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3347; 1995(3)WLC635; 1995(2)WLN31

may make rules, consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957, and the Air Force Act, 1950, and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time being in force, … July, 1994, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur, whereby he allowed the application dated 23-5-1994 filed under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') by the D. I. G., B. … Rules. 1969 (in short, 'the Rules, 1969'), but those fall within Rule 42 and, therefore, such a case should not be tried by the Security

Kush Kalra vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Air Force and Navy. We find that Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950; Section 12 of the Air Force Act, 1950 as well as Section 9 of the Indian Navy Act, 1957 contain specific and express provisions excluding women … process, it is stated that “gainfully employed civilians”, who fulfilled the prescribed criteria being graduates between 18 to 42 years, can apply in response to advertisements published in leading national newspapers and the Employment News in May-June

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … or victimization is made, the High Court has, indeed, the power under Article 226 to examine such issues. 42. The second reason for our decision not to remand the matter to the learned AFT is that the

Hav. Ved Prakash Sangwan Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21 and 226; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 20 and 23; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 11, 12 and 17; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 360

Reported in : 2000VAD(Delhi)749

the defense Department where services of a person were dispensed with invoking power under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950. That Section reads as under:- '18. Tenure of service under the Act._Every person subject to this Act shall … been dismissed from service wef 16 Jul 91 by Cdr 170 Inf Bde, under the provisions of para 423 of Regulations for the Army 1962 (Revised Edition 1967). 3. Please acknowledge receipt of this letter.' 5. The

Holy Family English Medium L.P. School and Others Vs. Employees State ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Education

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … on the decisions rendered by the Supreme Court in (1988) 4 SCC 42 (A Sundarambal V. Government of Goa, Daman and Dieu and ors.), (1996) … Menon, J. Dismissal of the Insurance cases filed by the appellants/educational institutions before the Employees Insurance Court under Section 75 r/w Sec. 77 of the Employees Insurance Act (for short Act ) for a declaration that their

Vijay Kumar Sharma and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : ConstitutionMotor Vehicles

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 31, 38, 39, 248, 251, 252, 253 and 254; Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - Sections 74 and 80; The Karnataka Contract Carriages (Acquisition) Act, 1976 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 6, 14, 15, 16, 49, 51, 62(1), 63(6), 66(1), 73 and 74; Motor Vehicles Act, 1939 - Sections 1(2), 2(4) and 217; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 107; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 100 and 107; Punjab Restitution of Mortgage Lands Act; Travancore-Cochin Motor Vehicles Act, 1950 - Sections 42 and 72; Essential Commodities Act, 1955 - Sections 16; Indian Penal Code; Madras Prohibition Act - Sections 4(2); Stamp Act; Industrial Disputes (Appellate Tribunal) Act, 1950; All India Services Act, 1951; All India Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules, 1955; Prevention of C

Reported in : AIR1990SC2072; JT1990(2)SC448; 1990(1)SCALE342; (1990)2SCC562; [1990]1SCR614

in it under Section 286 and 287 of the Travancore District Municipalities Act 1941, and the provisions of Section 42 of the Travancore-Cochin Motor Vehicles Act 1950 which came into force on January 5, 1950, providing for the … Court in the case of Meghraj and Ors. v. Allahrakhiya and Ors. AIR 1942 FC 27 and the other of the Privy Council reported in … to the State Government or the Corporation which it may establish under the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950. To make an alternative arrangement for running the contract carriages and to prevent both the misuse of the

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … an authority in exercise of the power conferred there under would likewise be efficacious within the said limits.' 42. A Constitution Bench of seven Judges had again an occasion to consider the pleasure doctrine in Moti Ram