Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Flt. Lt. G.S. Bajwa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 7, 41, 41(2), 65, 111 and 125; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 21, 22 and 33; Army Act; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 88, 89, 100, 102, 110, 111 and 125; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 104(2003)DLT618(SC); JT2003(4)SC505; 2003(4)SCALE494; (2003)9SCC630; [2003]3SCR1092; 2003(3)SLJ288(SC); 2003(2)LC849(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1479

Air Force discipline. Accordingly the respondent was charged of offences punishable under Sections 41(2) and 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). According to the respondent the proceedings before the General Court Martial were … which, on proof, entailed a sentence of imprisonment for a term which could extend to 14 years under Section 41(2) and 7 years under Section 65 of the Act. Moreover he was denied copies of the day to

G.S. Bajwa Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950; Air Force Rules - Rule 102

Reported in : 59(1995)DLT742

good order and Air Force discipline, and thereby committing offences punishable under Section 41(2) and Section 65 of Air Force Act. 1950. The said General Court Martial was conducted illegally and improperly. In proceeding of the said General Court Martial

Battula Veeraswamy Vs. the Regional Provident Fund Commissioner and or ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Employees Provident Fund and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 - Sections 1, 3, 5, 5A, 5D, 6, 6C, 6D, 7, 11, 14, 14A, 16, 17(1), 17(1C), 27 and 27A; Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1972 - Rules 49(1), 50(1) and 50(2); Central Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1971 ;Constitution of India - Articles 36, 37, 41, 47 and 226; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Civil Service Regulations

Reported in : 2009(6)ALT464

(Department of Expenditure) (Defence Division), paid out of the Defence Services Estimates and not permanently subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … violation thereof as punishable offences.11. A combined reading of Articles 36, 37, 41 and 47 of our Constitution makes it clear that the principles enunciated … The writ petitioner initially joined the services of Accounts Department on 6.11.1959. While he was working as a Section Officer (Accounts), he came on deputation to Mishra Dhatu Nigam Ltd, Hyderabad, a Government of India Undertaking (hereinafter

Gajendra Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Border Security Force Act, 1968 - Sections 46, 47, 47(1), 80, 81 and 141(2); Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 307, 323 and 452; Border Security Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 41, 41(1) and 42; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1974 - Sections 192, 439 and 475; Criminal Courts and Security Force Courts (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1969 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6 and 8; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 and 4; Constitution of India; Air Force Law

Reported in : 1995CriLJ3347; 1995(3)WLC635; 1995(2)WLN31

may make rules, consistent with this Code and the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957, and the Air Force Act, 1950, and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time being in force, … that the offences levelled against the petitioner arc not covered under Rule 41 of the Border Security Force Rules. 1969 (in short, 'the Rules, 1969'), … July, 1994, passed by the learned Sessions Judge, Jodhpur, whereby he allowed the application dated 23-5-1994 filed under Section 80 of the Border Security Force Act, 1968 (in short, 'the Act') by the D. I. G., B.

Sgt Mohanti Bk Vs. the Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Service

There was no illegality in detailing Sgts for guard duty as the provision for the same exist in Air force Regulations 1964. It was therefore decided that the number of guards was to be increased and to cater … was tried on the following charges:First Charges Section 41 (1) AF Act 1950DISOBEYING, SUCH MANNER AS TO SHOW WILFUL DEFIANCE OF AUTHORITY, A LAWFUL COMMAN … Court Martial (DCM) was convened on 27 March 1996 and he was tried on the following charges:First Charges Section 41 (1) AF Act 1950DISOBEYING, SUCH MANNER AS TO SHOW WILFUL DEFIANCE OF AUTHORITY, A LAWFUL COMMAN GIVEN PERSONALLY

Subhash Chandra Sarkar Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 41 and 164; Army Rules, 1954 - Rule 25

Reported in : AIR1973MP191; (1972)IILLJ611MP

for consideration before Sankaran, J., in Vishnu-krishnan Namboodiri v. K. N. Kripal, AIR 1952 Trav-Co 7, wherein the learned Judge held that ordinarily the Civil … of the Constitution would be able to interfere with the decision of a Court constituted under the Army Act, 1950, subject to the limitations pertaining to interference with decisions of Special Tribunals of course, as provided by Sub-clause … attending the investigation in spite of an order given by the Station Commandant amounted to an offence under Section 41 of the Army Act.9. The necessary facts for the decision of the said question of law are as … or tribunal constituted by or under any law relating to the Armed Forces.'Therefore, court-martial can in no sense be considered to be a Tribunal subordinate

Ajaib Singh Lehna Singh Vs. the State of Punjab and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 13, 14, 15, 19, 19(1), 19(5), 19(6), 21, 22, 51, 227, 245 and 253; Abducted Persons (Recovery and Restoration) Act, 1949 - Sections 4, 6, 6(1) and 7

Reported in : AIR1952P& H309

a person's freedom of locomotion 'except in making a lawful arrest.'In 'Gopalan A. K. v. State of Madras', AIR' 1950 SC 27, Patanjali Sastri J,. observed as follows:'Article 19 seems to my mind to presupposethat the citizen … of India and the Government of Pakistan for the restoration of abducted persons. It is to remain in force till the 31st October, 1952. According to section 2 an 'abducted person' means a male child under the … in the present case is whether the Abducted Persons (Recovery and Restoration) Act, 1949, is inconsistent with or violative of the Constitution of India. 2. … 8 Wall 168 at p. 130; 'Ward v. Maryland', (1870) 12 Wall 418 at p. 430.25. This was not the first occasion on which the

C.A.D. Civilian Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and O ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment Act, 1975 - Sections 3 and 27A; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment (Amendment) Act, 1991; Trade Unions Act; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 3, 4 and 21; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(10); Air Force Law; Constitution of India - Article 14, 19(1) and 33; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Defence Service (Field Services Liability) Rules, 1957; Army Rules, 1954

Reported in : 2006(6)ALLMR256; 2006(5)BomCR901; 2006(5)MhLj503

forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State.Sub-sections (b), (c) and (d) are … no orders to costs. Rule accordingly in both matters. - CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE, 1973 [C.A. No. 2/1974]. Section 41: [ Swatanter Kumar, CJ, Smt Ranjana Desai & D.B. Bhosale, JJ] Arrest of accused - Held, A Police

Arshnoor Kaur & Anr. versus the Union of India & Ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

Reported in : [2025] 8 S.C.R. 1241

Secretary & Anr., 2010 SCC OnLine Del 1116, wherein it has been held as under: - “45. The Air Force after due sanction of the President of India itself brought a policy into force for recruitment of women. … virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of the Indian Constitution that Parliament has enacted the Army Act, 1950 - Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950 restricts the Fundamental Right of females to join the Indian Army, except … such restrictions or abrogation must be made by law passed by Parliament. 41. It is by virtue of the power conferred by Article 33 of

Kush Kalra vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Education

Air Force and Navy. We find that Section 12 of the Army Act, 1950; Section 12 of the Air Force Act, 1950 as well as Section 9 of the Indian Navy Act, 1957 contain specific and express provisions excluding women … the court also considered the stereotypes and cultural norms and the requirement of deeper judicial scrutiny in paras 41 and 42 in following terms : “Stereotype roles and right to options 41. Professor Williams in The Equality