Advanced Search Results

Balbir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 9, 72, 124 and 125; Leave Rules - Rule 9; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1973 - Sections 475; Army Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 325

Reported in : 1995(43)BLJR343; 1994(4)SCALE904; (1995)1SCC90; [1994]Supp5SCR422; 1995(1)LC275(SC)

- jurisdiction - Sections 302 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 72, 124 and 125 of Air Force Act, 1950, Section 475 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 -

J.W.O. B.K. Singh Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 21, 226 and 227;; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 4(XV), 34 to 71, 110, 121, 152, 153 and 161;; Army Rules - Rule 37;; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 34 to 38, 40, 40(1), 43 and 43(2), (3) and (8);; Station Routine Orders

Reported in : (2000)3CALLT528(HC)

by any officer empowered for that behalf by warrant of the Central Government under section 153 of the Air Force Act. 1950 (for short 'the Act'). The respondent has moved CAN No 7513 of 1999 for vacating and/or recalling the … and such disobedience to superior's order would expose him to severe consequences. Annexures 'B' P. 33 'D' p. 34, 'E' p. 36, 'F 44 'L' p.49 of A.O. clearly show that the respondents have granted enough opportunities

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … down that every person subject to that Act shall hold office during the pleasure of the President. ' 34. In the Reply on Merits in paragraph 8 it is stated :In reply 8 it was though proper

Gajanan Gangaram Patil and Others Vs. M/S. Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (I) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … dismissed from the employment after following due process of law. There were 34 ex NOCIL employees belonging to various categories who had desired to join … difficulties. 3 On 20 March, 2003, a Closure permission was granted by the State Government to NOCIL under Section 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the ID Act), but this was set aside by

Gajanan Gangaram Patil and Others Vs. M/S. Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (I) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … dismissed from the employment after following due process of law. There were 34 ex NOCIL employees belonging to various categories who had desired to join … difficulties. 3 On 20 March, 2003, a Closure permission was granted by the State Government to NOCIL under Section 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the ID Act), but this was set aside by

Orissa State Road Transport Corporation Employees' Association of Unio ...

Court : Orissa

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 25-N; Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Orissa State Road Transport Corporation (Classification, Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1978 - Regulations 49 and 116; Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950 - Sections 34; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : (2001)ILLJ927Ori

or retrenchment has led to thatdispute, but does not include any such person--(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of,1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or theNavy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or(ii) … Transport Corporation (Classification, Recruitment and Conditions of Service) Regulations, 1978' (hereinafter referred to as 'Service Regulations') framed under section 34 of the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950. In regulation 49, classification and categories of all the services of

Sanjeet Singh Kaila vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

EWHC694is relied upon. Learned counsel also argues that the petition is not covered under Section 27 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Counsel argues that Section 27 requiring a complaint to be made to the Central Government first, operates merely … IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on :21. 04.2016 Pronounced on:02. 05.2017 + W.P.(C) 3414/2013 SANJEET SINGH KAILA ........ Petitioner Through: Sh. Bharat. S. Kumar, Ms. Julien George and Sh. Sai Deepak, Advocates.

The British India Corporation Ltd., Cawnpore Woollen Mills Branch Thro ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 20A and 25G; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 14, 34 and 38; Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946; Army Act, 1960; Air force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Specific Relief Act, 1877 - Sections 21; Constitution of India - Article 311; Industrial Law

Reported in : 2006(2)AWC1511; [2006(109)FLR460]

include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1960 (46 of 1950) or the Air force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) or [the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957); or (ii) who is employed in the … 1946 (here-in-after referred to as '1946 Act') and as such, he could seek the relief of declaration under Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act. Thus, the suit was decreed and the relief of declaration was granted in

Extra Judl.Exec.Victim Families Assnandanr Vs. Union of India and Anr

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

court inherently lacked jurisdiction to try the accused. This Court considered the provisions of Section 72 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (corresponding to Section 70 of the Army Act), Sections 124 and 125 of the said Act (corresponding to … personnel do not act against an enemy or show cowardice, it is a Court-martial offence under Army Act Section 34, punishable with death.”[7]. Reference is made to Ex-Havildar Ratan Singh v. Union of India[8]. to conclude that a

Mr. Karthiyayani and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : (1984)ILLJ259Ker

not include any such person(i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934 (34 of 1934), or (ii) who is employed in … for decision in these three appeals is as to whether a teacher is a workman as defined in Section 2(s), Industrial Disputes Act. Khalid, J. in his judgment in O.P. Nos. 3696 of 1979 and 637 of