Advanced Search Results

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … In August, 1979 the appellant was shifted to Jaipur where also he was kept under close arrest.22. On 31.8.1979 a statutory complaint was made to the Chief of Army Staff but that was not considered at all

Sq Ldr C. Singh Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Jaipur

Subject : MRTP

and hence could not be promoted to the next rank after retirement. 11. As regards the applicability of Air Force Act, 1950, Sec. 26 of the Reserve and Auxiliary Air Force Act,1952 lays down the conditions of applicability. It clearly … of 57 years, the applicant was superannuated from Indian Air Force on 31.8.2004 and was thereafter placed on regular Air Force Reserve till 31.8.2006. 3. … the rank of Wing Commander and consequential retrial benefits. The writ petition was transferred to this Tribunal under Sec.34 of the Armed Forces Tribunals Act, 2007 and the same has been registered as Transfer Application No. 144

Gajanan Gangaram Patil and Others Vs. M/S. Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (I) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Later, the permission was once again granted on 20 March 2003. On 31 January 2004, the Industrial Tribunal set aside closure permission under Section 25-O(5). … difficulties. 3 On 20 March, 2003, a Closure permission was granted by the State Government to NOCIL under Section 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the ID Act), but this was set aside by

Gajanan Gangaram Patil and Others Vs. M/S. Relene Petrochemicals Ltd. ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (I) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … Later, the permission was once again granted on 20 March 2003. On 31 January 2004, the Industrial Tribunal set aside closure permission under Section 25-O(5). … difficulties. 3 On 20 March, 2003, a Closure permission was granted by the State Government to NOCIL under Section 25O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short, the ID Act), but this was set aside by

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(9), 3, 5, 4(1), 4(4), 4(5), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26(1), 26(2), 29, 30, 31 and 37; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(I) and 4K; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(N) and 25(F); Indian Boilers Act, 1923; Apprenticeship Rules, 1992 - Rules 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Apprenticeship Rules, 1962 - Rules 4B and 6; Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act,1934; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer … to, the Apprenticeship Advisor can file an appropriate complaint before a competent court of law. In terms of Section 31 of the Act the only penalty which can be imposed upon the employer is fine which shall not

Secretary, Madras Gymkhana Club Employees Overruled

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Media and CommunicationLabour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Discipline Act, 1934; Central Provinces and Berar Industrial Disputes Settlement Act, 1974; Commonwealth Conciliation and Arbitration Act - Sections 4

Reported in : AIR1968SC554; [1967(15)FLR411]; (1967)IILLJ720SC; [1968]1SCR742

does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950, or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Discipline Act, 1934; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an office … is admittedly a members' club and not a proprietary club. On December 31, 1962 its membership was about 1200 with 800 active members. The object … or industrial occupation or avocation of workmen'. 5. The word 'employer' is defined by clause (g) of the section as :- 'employer means - (1) in relation to an industry carried on by or under the authority

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … which an appeal may be preferred by him to that Court under Section 30 or Sub-Section (2) of Section 31. 37. There is no provision in the AFT Act or the Rules made thereunder making the Limitation Act,

M.E.S. Employees Union, A.P. Area, Secunderabad Vs. Govt. of A.P. and ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Andhra Pradesh Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employees Act, 1987 - Sections 2, 3, 4, 5, 6(2), 27-A, 31, 32 and 35; Financial Regulations - Regulation 288-A; Army Act, 1950; Constitution of India - Article 276; Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950

Reported in : [2002]126STC523(AP)

288-A reads :--'A person subject to the Army Act, 1950 (Act XLVI of 1950) the Navy Act, 1957/the Air Force Act, 1950, who is compelled by the exigencies of Army/ Navy/Air Force duty to reside within the limits of the … employers, as the case may be, shall not be liable to pay tax on behalf of such person. Section 31. Power to exempt :--The Government may, by notification, make an exemption or reduction in the rate of tax

M.P. Menon Vs. State

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1953CriLJ1786

5 of 1950. The stand taken by the accused is that Section 31 of the Public Safety Measures Act 1950 is ultra vires of Article 19(1)(a) and (2) of the Constitution and infringes upon the fundamental rights guaranteed … first entry in the State List is 'Public Order' (but not including the use of naval, military or air forces or any other armed forces of the Union in aid of the Civil Power). The State Legislature … the State and spread false reports about the Government and the Police Force. Such contravention was punishable as an offence under Section 31(5) of the

G. Sitaram, (Ex. Sergeant, Indian Air Force) Versus Union of India and ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Chennai

Subject : Land Acquisition

in exercise of the power of the Air officer Commanding-in-Chief (AOC-in-C), Maintenance Command, IAF, under Section 20(3) of Air Force Act 1950 r/w Rule 18 of Air Force Rules 1969 on the ground of conduct which has led to his … also to settle the petitioners claim in lieu of the Government of India, Ministry of Defence order dated 31.10.1990, by way of filing W.P.No.5536 of 2004 before the High Court of Judicature at Madras, which has, after