Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 30 · Page 1 of about 3,180 results (0.122 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Oct 01 2004

U.P. State Electricity Board Vs. Shri Shiv Mohan Singh and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-01-2004

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Apprentices Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 2(9), 3, 5, 4(1), 4(4), 4(5), 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 26(1), 26(2), 29, 30, 31 and 37; Uttar Pradesh Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2(I) and 4K; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 6(N) and 25(F); Indian Boilers Act, 1923; Apprenticeship Rules, 1992 - Rules 6, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 14; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Contract Labour (Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970; Apprenticeship Rules, 1962 - Rules 4B and 6; Contract Act - Sections 23

Reported in : AIR2004SC5009; JT2004(8)SC272; 2004(3)KLT686(SC); (2005)ILLJ117SC; 2004(8)SCALE475; (2004)8SCC402; (2005)1UPLBEC175

but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Army Act, 1950 or the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy (Discipline) Act,1934; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an officer … breach of the non-registration of the contract of apprenticeship. But that has not been done so because under Section 30 of the Apprentices Act, 1961 any offence arising under this Act has been penalized, like apprentice who is

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 29 2006

District Forest Officer, Madurai Division Vs. P. Ganesan (Died) and or ...

Court : Chennai

Decided on : Sep-29-2006

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 2(1), 30, 30(1) and 30(2); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 28; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; ;Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 - Rules 36 and 43; Constitution of India - Article 226; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2007ACJ1521; [2007(112)FLR561]; (2006)4MLJ1653

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-(1) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … 2002 (1) CTC 675. In paragraph 8 of thejudgment a specific point was raised and taking note of Section 30 of the workman compensation Act, enabling the party against whom the award passed, provides for an appeal remedy,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 17 2013

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Aug-17-2013

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … the appellant, extend the time within which an appeal may be preferred by him to that Court under Section 30 or Sub-Section (2) of Section 31. 37. There is no provision in the AFT Act or the Rules

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 11 2015

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Major General Shri Kant Sharma and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-11-2015

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the Air Force Act, 1950, (45 of 1950) as the case may be; or if sentence is found to be excessive, illegal or … JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J In these appeals the question raised is whether the right of appeal under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ct'), against an order of Armed

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 07 2014

Lac Rahul Chandra Kapari Vs. Uoi and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Decided on : May-07-2014

Subject : Education

Matched in: Judge R.C. Mishra, Member &Amp; the Honourable Mr. Air Marshal J.N. Burma, Member

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 02 1992

Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Decided on : Sep-02-1992

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3070

Code and, the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time … Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and the Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of … incident which took place on 29-2-1992, he was taken into custody on 30-3-1992 by the naval authorities. Thereafter his wife filed a habeas corpus application,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 09 2013

Ex. Lac Gk Singh (656393), Trade – Med/Asst Vs. Union of India, M ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : Sep-09-2013

Subject : Land Acquisition

tried by the District Court Martial for two charges. The first charge was under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950 for committing a civil offence, that is to say, using criminal force to a woman intending to outrage … outside India, or (c) at a frontier post specified by the said Government by notification in this behalf.” 30. Section 71 of the Air Force Act, in our view, deals with the civil offences, according to which

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 11 1999

Air Marshal Amarjeet Singh Sethi Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Feb-11-1999

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 14, 16 and 226; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 7(2), 58(1) and 191

Reported in : 1999(3)KarLJ336

the reason the same is not published in the Official Gazette as required under Section 191 of the Air Force Act, 1950, which governs the service conditions of the petitioner. Therefore, a request is made to declare that the impugned … alia seeking a declaration, to declare that the policy letter No. 7(1) 79(D) AIR III Volume II, dated 30-8-1986 has no statutory force and the same is arbitrary and unreasonable or in the alternative to hold that

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2004

Avm M.S. Brar, Avsm, Vm Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-03-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2004SC5141; 2004(4)AWC3085(SC); 113(2004)DLT514(SC); JT2004(7)SC148; 2004(7)SCALE410; (2004)12SCC114; (2004)3UPLBEC2641

rank of Air Marshal. Against this denial the appellant submitted a statutory application under Section 27 of the Air Force Act, 1950. The appellant also filed Civil Writ Petition No. 3242 of 2001 against the denial of extension of service … approved by the authorities because of the remarks in his Annual Report for the period from 1.12.1997 to 30.9.1998 and also on the basis of the Appraisal Reports for the preceding five years. The respondent in the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 03 2002

Sugreev Singh Desuriya Vs. Central Government of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Decided on : Apr-03-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 73 and 82; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 15

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1442

or under Section 82 against the appellant-writ petitioner. If it has been proceeded under Section 82 of the Air Force Act, 1950. it cannot be said that the minor punishment awarded to the appellant-writ petitioner is without jurisdiction.17. In view … orderly duty. (c) While on Mail orderly duty, misplacedthe two copies of SRO (No. 28 and 29) on 30th July, 1989.27.5.1987Absented himself from duty at 7.00 hrs. on27.5.1987 and reported back to duty at 7.00 hrs, on

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial