Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Vs. E ...
Delhi
Nov-13-2002
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 20(7), 65 and 71; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 18, 18(1), 24, 24(4) and 36; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 45; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(3) and 14(4)
101(2002)DLT267; 2003(1)SLJ171(Delhi)
Force Rules, 1969, was asked to show cause why he should not be dismissed from service under Sub-section 3 of Section 20 of the Air Force Act, 1950 for committing the aforesaid offence. He was also asked … On April 27, 1995, charges were framed against the respondent. He was charged under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950, for having used criminal force to a woman with the intention to outrage her modesty. The respondent was
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskC.A.D. Civilian Workers' Union and Ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and O ...
Mumbai
Jul-07-2006
Other Taxes
Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment Act, 1975 - Sections 3 and 27A; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Traders, Callings and Employment (Amendment) Act, 1991; Trade Unions Act; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 2(1), 2(2), 3, 4 and 21; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 3(10); Air Force Law; Constitution of India - Article 14, 19(1) and 33; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Defence Service (Field Services Liability) Rules, 1957; Army Rules, 1954
2006(6)ALLMR256; 2006(5)BomCR901; 2006(5)MhLj503
forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State.Sub-sections (b), (c) and (d) are … initially, did not contain any power to grant exemption in favour of any person from the charging provision (section 3) of the Act. The Legislature later on granted such exemption. Consequently, Section 27A was inserted by Maharashtra Act
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSwadesh Pal Baliyan Vs. Air Force Commanding-in-chief and anr.
Supreme Court of India
Nov-01-2004
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 18
2005(1)ESC16; JT2004(9)SC405; 2004(9)SCALE195; (2004)12SCC92; 2005(1)SLJ285(SC); (2005)1UPLBEC391
corporal in Indian Air Force was removed form service in exercise of powers under Section 20(3) of the Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 18 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 by order dated 30th June, 1998. The writ
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
Madhavnath B. Tamboli Vs. the State of Maharashtra, Through the Secret ...
Mumbai
Jun-27-2003
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 23; Maharashtra Released Defence Services Personnel (Fixation of Pay and Seniority) Rules, 1974 - Rules 2 and 3(9); Constitution of India - Article 309; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 10; Punjab Recruitment of Ex-Service Rules, 1982
2003(4)ALLMR190; 2004(2)BomCR836
tenure.' 8. The Discharged Certificate which has been issued to the petitioner is under Section 23 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Section 23 provides thus:'23. Certificate on termination of service.-Every warrant officer, or enrolled person who is dismissed, removed, discharged, … general behaviour of the petitioner during the services is recorded as 'exemplary' and the trade proficiency as 'exceptional'. 3. On 11th October 1985, the petitioner was appointed as Surveyor in the Revenue and Forests Department of the
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskMrs. Pramila Nesargi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Karnataka
Nov-20-1996
Constitution
Constitution of India - Articles 226 and 227; Cantonment Act, 1924 - Sections 3; ;Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937 - Rules 5(1), 14(3) and 14(5); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 45, 52 and 57
ILR1997KAR1810
229 of the Constitution of India and is therefore, void and unenforceable in law.27. Section 45 of the Air Force Act, 1950 provides for punishment for the officer governed by the Act who behave in a manner unbecoming of his … of the beauty pageant.23. Admittedly, the Air Force area at Hebbal has not been declared a 'Cantonment' under Section 3 of the Cantonment Act, 1924. Therefore, the 'Cantonment Land (Administration) Rules, 1937 (hereinafter, in short 'the Rules') wilt
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskCourt on Its Own Motion Vs. Mr. Gulshan Bajwa
Delhi
Oct-19-2006
Contempt of Court
Contempt of Courts Act, 1926 - Sections 13; Contempt of Courts Act, 1971 - Sections 3, 5, 6, 8, 9, 13, 17(5) and 19(3); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 65, 110 and 161(2); Constitution of India - Article 215; Contempt of Courts (Amendment) Act; Probation of Offenders Act, 1958 - Sections 3, 4 and 12
141(2007)DLT111
the petitioner under arrest; the purported order dated 14.1.1985 passed by the Central Government under Section 161(2) of Air Force Act, 1950; Section 65 & 110 of Air Force Act; the order for arrest of the petitioner during the trial by … may not be necessary to refer to all those orders and we may refer to the order dated 31.8.2006, when the Court had issued formal notice to show cause as to why the petitioner be not dealt
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskBalbir Singh and anr. Vs. State of Punjab
Supreme Court of India
Nov-10-1994
Criminal
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 4, 9, 72, 124 and 125; Leave Rules - Rule 9; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3 to 6; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - +, 1973 - Sections 475; Army Act, 1950; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 34, 302 and 325
1995(43)BLJR343; 1994(4)SCALE904; (1995)1SCC90; [1994]Supp5SCR422; 1995(1)LC275(SC)
- jurisdiction - Sections 302 and 34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860, Sections 72, 124 and 125 of Air Force Act, 1950, Section 475 of Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - … Bachan Singh and Kabul Singh were convicted by the learned Addl. Sessions Judge for an offence under Section 302/149 IP and sentenced to suffer life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs. 2000/- each and in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskHarikant Ramnarayan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Mumbai
Apr-05-2007
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125, 126 and 126(1); Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Criminal Code and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 4 and 5; Air Force Law; Army Rules - Rule 125
2007(5)MhLj419
Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time … cognizance thereof has already been taken by the competent Criminal Court, whether the Officer Commanding in view of Section 125 of the Army Act is legally entitled to make a request to the Criminal Court to hand … a military personnel. At the relevant time, the petitioner was attached to 333 Missile Brigade Military Cantonment, Kamptee, District Nagpur. It is submitted that on
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskN.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-21-2000
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984
95(2002)DLT770
Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … K. Ramamoorthy, J. 1. The appellants in the Latent Patent Appeals, the petitioner in C.W.P. 3063/95 and the petitioner in C.W.P. 4082/95 have come forward with a grievance that their services have been dispensed
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.M. Malhotra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-04-2005
Service
Army Act 1950 - Sections 19, 45 and 191(2); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 45, 46 and 191(5); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 5, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3) and 16; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16 and 16(4); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 1 to 4, 14 and 16(4); Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Hindu Law
AIR2006SC80; 2006(1)BomCR661; [2005(107)FLR1006]; JT2005(9)SC506; 2006(1)MhLj1; 2006MPLJ1(SC); 2005(8)SCALE202; (2005)8SCC351; 2006(1)SLJ303(SC)
upon to show-cause as to why he should not be dismissed/removed from service under Section 19 of the Air Force Act; 1950 (in short the 'Act') read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969. The charges leveled in … all enunciate a general rule of conduct and behavior followed by specific prohibitions and restrictions. For example, Rule 3 of the Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 which occurs under the heading 'General' provides that every Government
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »