Advanced Search Results

District Forest Officer, Madurai Division Vs. P. Ganesan (Died) and or ...

Court : Chennai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2; Workmen Compensation Act, 1923 - Sections 2, 2(1), 30, 30(1) and 30(2); Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 - Sections 28; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; ;Tamil Nadu Pension Rules, 1978 - Rules 36 and 43; Constitution of India - Article 226; Limitation Act - Sections 5

Reported in : 2007ACJ1521; [2007(112)FLR561]; (2006)4MLJ1653

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-(1) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … to entertain the claim petition of a Government servant, is also unsustainable, in view of the fact that Section 28 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985, exempts the Industrial Tribunal, Labour Court or any other authority constituted under

The Union Carbide (India) Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Kumbla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(5), 28 and 44; Constitution of India - Article 227; Trade Union Act, 1926; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR540; 1999(1)BomCR705; 1999(2)MhLj63

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the Police service or as an officer … the petitioner seeks to do by the present petition.3. The complaint was filed by the first respondent under section 28 of the 1971 Act alleging that the petitioner had committed unfair labour practices mentioned in Item Nos. 1(a),

Mangal Singh Bhatti Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Kerala

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 78, 78(1) and 78(2); Navy Regulations - Regulations 28, 30, 149 and 151; Army Act, 1950; Air Force Act, 1950; Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of jurisdiction) Rules, 1978 - Rules 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 8 and 9; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 549

Reported in : 1993CriLJ3070

Code and, the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time … Commanding Officer, INS Venduruthy, for trial under the Navy Act, 1957, and in accordance with the provisions of Section 78 of the Navy Act, 475 of the Cr.P.C. and the Criminal Courts and Court Martial (Adjustment of … service, and opted for voluntary retirement. He was to be relieved on 28-3-1992 at Bombay, and before going to Bombay he was to be relieved

Harikant Ramnarayan Singh Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 125, 126 and 126(1); Navy Act, 1957; Air Force Act, 1950; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 192, 209, 240, 246(1), 252, 254, 255(1), 255(2), 256(1), 257, 475 and 475(1); Criminal Code and Court Martial (Adjustment of Jurisdiction) Rules, 1952 - Rules 3, 4 and 5; Air Force Law; Army Rules - Rule 125

Reported in : 2007(5)MhLj419

Code and the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957), and the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950) and any other law, relating to the Armed Forces of the Union, for the time … cognizance thereof has already been taken by the competent Criminal Court, whether the Officer Commanding in view of Section 125 of the Army Act is legally entitled to make a request to the Criminal Court to hand … impugned order whereby the case papers and documents of Sessions Trial No. 28/2006 as well as custody of accused (petitioner) was directed to be handed

Kalawati Pandurang Fulzele Vs. Divisional Controller

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 2, 2(14), 3, 3(5), 10(2), 28 and 44; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 25B, 25F and 25G; Industrial Disputes (Bombay) Rules, 1957 - Rule 81; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Sales Promotion Employees (Conditions of Service) Act, 1976 - Sections 2; Contract Labour Act; Labour and Industrial Law; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 15(1), 15(3), 38, 39, 41, 42, 43, 46, 47 and 227

Reported in : 2007(5)ALLMR80; 2007(5)BomCR177

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person-(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … treated as the one under Article 227 of the Constitution of India.FACTS3. The petitioner filed a complaint under Section 28 read with item (1) of Schedule IV of the Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions & Prevention of Unfair

Union of India Rep. By the Secretary Ministry of Home Affairs Vs. Ranj ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Criminal

purpose of any law referred in Section 25(1) of the PC Act. Only the Army Act, 1950; the Air Force Act, 1950; the Navy Act, 1957; the Border Security Force Act, 1968; the Coast Guard Act, 1978 and the National … special Judge shall be deemed to be a Court of Sessions. It is also necessary to refer to Section 28 of the PC Act which provides that the provisions of the PC Act shall be in addition to,

Union of India (Uoi) Through Its General Manager, North Eastern Railwa ...

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Reported in : [2007(115)FLR536]

dispute, but does not include any such person-(i) who is subject 10 the Army Act, 1950 or the Air Force Act, 1950 or the Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; or (ii) who is employed in the police service or as an … piece rated basis. The action of the respondents in closing the establishment without complying with the provision of Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, was patently erroneous and volatile of the provisions of the. Act. The … Railways Establishment Manual and other statutory Rules and Regulations. As per Para 2839 of the Indian Railways Establishment Manual the petitioner provide benefits to the

Official Liquidator, Palai Central Bank Ltd. (In Liquidation), Ernakul ...

Court : Kerala

Subject : Company

Acts : Limitation Act, 1908 - Sections 3; Companies Act, 1913 - Sections 235 and 235(1); Companies Act, 1956 - Sections 205 and 543; Banking Companies Act, 1949 - Sections 45O(2) and 45H(1); Companies Act, 1114 - Sections 291

Reported in : AIR1966Ker121

theyapply to causes of actions which arose before their enactment' -- the quotation is from Ramanathan v. Kandappa AIR 1951 Mad 314, para. 3. That might well be so, although the qualification must be added--qualification expressly declared … Banking Companies Act, giving a longer period of 12 years, came into force on 30-12-1953, the present application for the same relief is necessarily barred; … Rs. 25.fi lakhs is in respect of similar payments for the years 1950 to 1658, the only difference being that the false income and profits … being overlooked or misapplied. The first is the elementary proposition that, except by the operation of provisions like Section 28 of the Indian Limitation Act, 1908, I shall for purposes of illustration refer to the more familiar provisions

Wazira and anr. Vs. Shamulal and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Property

Acts : Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950 - Sections 46

Reported in : AIR1960Raj283

of such matters, because if that were allowed, the purpose of Section 46' or for that matter of Section 28 of the Act of 1950 would be completely frustrated. I hold accordingly. 13. Now let us see how … be referred to in this connection is Abdul Majid v. P.R. Nayak, AIR 1951 Bom 440. The facts in this case were these. The Deputy … interpretation of Section 46 of the Act or1950 which bad come into force on 18-4-1950, before the present suit was instituted on 8-12-1950.Section 46 reads … a particular property is or is not an evacuee property. Section 46 of the Administration of Evacuee Property Act, 1950, says that save as otherwise expressly provided in this Act, no civil or revenue court shall have jurisdiction:

V.K. Singh 803537 Nc (E) 00 Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Subject : Service

Reported in : 1998(1)WLC435; 1997(2)WLN306

why action should not. be taken against him to separate him from service under Section 20 of the Air Force Act, 1950, hereinafter called 'Act' as he entered in the service by making misrepresentation. Petitioner filed reply to the same … like the petitioner were members of non combatant force and also subjected to the provisions of the Act. 28. Thus, learned Counsel failed to substantiate this ground and it also fails.