Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 27 · Page 1 of about 2,829 results (0.099 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jan 07 2002

M.S. Brar Vs. Union of India and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-07-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 27

Reported in : 2002IIIAD(Delhi)611; 96(2002)DLT483

granted the extension of service. Against this communication the petitioner submitted a petition under Section 27 of the Air Force Act 1950 (for short the Act) on 20 March 2000, raising the following objections to the denial of extension, to

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 03 2004

Avm M.S. Brar, Avsm, Vm Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Sep-03-2004

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 27

Reported in : AIR2004SC5141; 2004(4)AWC3085(SC); 113(2004)DLT514(SC); JT2004(7)SC148; 2004(7)SCALE410; (2004)12SCC114; (2004)3UPLBEC2641

rank of Air Marshal. Against this denial the appellant submitted a statutory application under Section 27 of the Air Force Act, 1950. The appellant also filed Civil Writ Petition No. 3242 of 2001 against the denial of extension of service

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Apr 01 1997

U.S. Boparai Vs. Union of India

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Apr-01-1997

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 27; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 1997IIIAD(Delhi)810; 1997(41)DRJ474b

of the Promotion Board. It may be pertinent to observe that the petitioner has submitted statutory complaint under Section 27 of the Air Force Act'1950 on 16.5.1996 against non promotion to the rank of Air Vice Marshal. The … Training Establishment in the year 1962-63 and got promotions up to the level of Air Commodore in the Air Force. The petitioner's main grievance before this Court is that the respondents arbitrarily have not promoted him to the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Mar 07 2003

Indian Air Force Employees Union Vs. State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Mar-07-2003

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Indian Trade Unions Act, 1926 - Sections 2(1), 3 and 27A; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1975 - Sections 4, 27 and 27A; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions Trades, Callings and Employments (Amendment) Act, 1976; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19(1), 33 and 276; Civil Service Rules; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 21; ;Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions Trades, Callings and Employments (Amendment) Act, 1991; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions Trades, Callings and Employments Ordinance, 1996; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions Trades, Callings and Employments (Amendment) Act, 1997; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions Trades, Callings and Employments (Amendment) Act, 2000

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR804; 2003(5)BomCR817; 2003(4)MhLj609

the armed forces of theUnion, that is to say to whom the provisions ofthe Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, orthe Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part ofthe State. 12. Section 27 A Clause (a) was

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 10 2011

Devendra Singh Rajput Vs. Gp. Capt. S.K. Sharma and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kolkata

Decided on : Mar-10-2011

Subject : Criminal

that is to say, murder, punishable under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, - Section 71 Air Force Act, 1950 In that he, at 5 Wing, Air Force on 16 Sep. 2008, by causing death of 637030-K JWO … Force Act, Committing a Civil offence, that is to say using arms for an unlawful purpose, punishable under Section 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 In that he, At 5 Wing, Air Force on 16 Sep. 2008, fired

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 21 2000

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … Capt. R.S. Rathore was arrested on the 24th of August, 1978. Capt. A.K. Rana was arrested on the 27th of October, 1978.7. Capt. Kulwant Singh, Major R.K. Midha, Capt. J.S. Yadav, Capt. Arun Sharma, Capt. Vijay Kumar

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 20 2000

H.E. Education Society, Barkheda, Bhopal Vs. the Appellate Authority a ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Jul-20-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 1(3), 2, 3, 4 and 7(4); Minimum Wages Act - Sections 2, 3, 7 and 27; Industrial Disputes Act - Sections 2; Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Madhya Pradesh Payment of Gratuity Rules, 1973

Reported in : (2001)ILLJ691MP; 2001(2)MPHT383

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person- (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or theArmy Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of1957); or … appended to the Minimum Wages Act by the Government of Haryana in exercise of the power conferred under Section 27 of the Minimum Wages Act. It was observed that a combined reading of Sections 3, 2(i) and 27

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 07 2009

Jetlite (India) Ltd. Vs. Capt. R. Khosla

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-07-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 27, 33C and 33(C)(2); Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 157(2009)DLT677

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … to determination of the issue as to whether the petitioner is a workman or not as envisaged under Section 27 of the Industrial Disputes Act, therefore, once the said issue has yet to be finally decided by the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Nov 16 1999

Employees' Union Ordnance Factory and Ors. Vs. State of M.P. and Anr.

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Nov-16-1999

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Army Act, 1950; ;Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1975 - Sections 27 and 27A; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226 and 276; Central Civil Services Control and Appeal Rules; Madhya Pradesh Vrittikar Adhiniyam, 1995 - Sections 2, 3, 3(2), 3(3), 4 and 6

Reported in : 2000(1)MPHT496; 2000(1)MPLJ514

forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State.'The Division Bench took note of … entitled to any relief. A stand has also been taken that the word 'employee' has been defined under Section 2(c) of the Act and the likes of the petitioners come under the ambit and sweep of that … and Collection of Tax :-- (1) Subject to the provisions of Article 276 of the Constitution of India, and of this Act there shall be

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 06 2000

Pratiraksha Mazdoor Sangh and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Sep-06-2000

Subject : Other Taxes

Acts : Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1975 - Sections 27A; Constitution of India - Articles 14 and 226

Reported in : 2001(2)BomCR414

forces of the Union, that is to say, to whom the provisions of the Army Act, 1950, the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957 apply serving in any part of the State, (b) x x x(c) x … under the Army Act, 1950, so as to get themselves included in the class of persons exempted under section 27-A of the Maharashtra State Tax on Professions, Trades, Callings and Employments Act, 1975 ('Act' for short) from payment

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial