Advanced Search Results

Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Vs. E ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 20(7), 65 and 71; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 18, 18(1), 24, 24(4) and 36; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 45; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(3) and 14(4)

Reported in : 101(2002)DLT267; 2003(1)SLJ171(Delhi)

On April 27, 1995, charges were framed against the respondent. He was charged under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950, for having used criminal force to a woman with the intention to outrage her modesty. The respondent was … respondent was provided full opportunity to cross-examine the witnesses during the recording of summary of evidence under Rule 24 of the Air Force Rules. He was also given an opportunity to produce defense evidence at that stage.

Sgt. Jeevan Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 20, 22, 24, 73 and 189(2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 15(2), 13 to 18; Constitution of India - Article 20(2)

Reported in : ILR1992KAR1027; 1992(2)KarLJ408

Order under Appeals, had refused to interfere with the orders of discharge of Airmen, who were subject to Air Force Act, 1950 (for short, 'the Act'), we were, to begin with, rather disinclined to entertain these appeals being of the … in such manner as may be prescribed, that is, by Rules made under the Act. The provision in Section 24 of the Act refers to the termination of the services of aperson subject to the Act when he

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Corporal Sharma A.K.

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Indian Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 150, 161, 161(1) and 161(2); Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 109 and 325; Constitution of India - Article 226; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24 and 59

in its support. It is stated that by virtue of the provisions of Section 161 of the Indian Air Force Act, 1950, hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1950', an appeal by way of representation was submitted by the petitioner … Officer. Each one of them was charged separately. It is stated that there was no compliance of Rule 24 of the Air Force Rules, 1969, before refraining the charge and making a very serious allegation under Sections

F.R. Jesuratnam Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 65 and 73

Reported in : AIR1981SC1595a; [1981(43)FLR264]; (1981)IILLJ195SC; 1981(3)SCALE1056; (1981)3SCC525; [1982]1SCR40; 1981(2)SLJ239(SC); 1981(13)LC630(SC)

tried by a General Court Martial on four charges and was convicted on two: (1) under Section 45, Air Force Act, 1950 for behaving in a manner unbecoming of the position and character expected of him as an officer in … sentence of rigorous imprisonment be carried out by confinement in civil prison. Subsequently, by an order dated May 24, 1975, the Central Government remitted the unexpired portion of the punishment of rigorous imprisonment. 3. The appellant was

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … were roped in and were charged with an offence of espionage. Capt. R.S. Rathore was arrested on the 24th of August, 1978. Capt. A.K. Rana was arrested on the 27th of October, 1978.7. Capt. Kulwant Singh, Major

Sanjeet Singh Kaila vs.union of India and Anr.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Right to Information

EWHC694is relied upon. Learned counsel also argues that the petition is not covered under Section 27 of the Air Force Act, 1950. Counsel argues that Section 27 requiring a complaint to be made to the Central Government first, operates merely … was determined that it was originally located around 3 o‟çlock position. This fatigue failure of afterburner manifold occurred 246:45 h after the X- ray and dye penetrant check during the last overhaul at HAL. Sabotage. The element

inder SaIn Bakshi S/O Bakshi Anant Ram Vs. Union of India, Through Sec ...

Court : Delhi

Subject : ServiceConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 197, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2), 372(1) and 447; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Sections 9; The Civilians in defense Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1952 - Rules 1, 3, 4, 8, 9, 24, 25, 26 and 31; Government of India Act, 1935 - Sections 240, 240(3) and 241; Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules - Rules 49 and 55; Railway Establishment Code, 1959 - Rules 148(3) and 149(3); Indian Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934; Army Act, 1950; Indian Air Force Act, 1950; Civil Service Regulations - Regulation 197-A - Schedule - Articles 442 and 443; Motor Vehicles Act - Sections 43-A

Reported in : AIR1969Delhi220

estimates and nto subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Indian Navy (Discipline) Act, 1934, and the Indian Air Force Act, 1950, who is in the whole time employment of the Government of India under the Ministry of defense. In … statement, viz., that in matters at defense personnel the jurisdiction of the Civil Courts is impliedly barred under Section 9, Civil Procedure Code. (This appears to have been raised by way of amendment to the written statement … appellant on 20-7-1950 and he was directed to submit his Explanationn by 24-7-1950. An inquiry was conducted into the charges and finally on 2-4-1951, the

Ex. Sq. Leader Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Service

Acts : Air force Rules, 1969 - Rule 17

Reported in : 1998(47)DRJ652

him to show cause as to why he should not be removed from the service under Section 19, Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 17 Air Force Rules, 1969 for avoiding flying duties and showing lack of confidence in … grant of retiring gratuity to you is at the discretion of the President under the provisions of Regulation 24 of Pension Regulations for the Air Force, Part-I (1961); 4. AND WHEREAS, having regard to the circumstances leading

Wing Commander Rajiv Arora Vs. Union and India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 109, 40, 45, 47, 48, 65, 110, 129, 152 and 161(1); Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 491; Air-Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 24, 37, 37(3), 43, 43(4), 49, 50, 52, 53, 54, 59, 113, 154 and 156; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 2007(93)DRJ229

the said Court had assembled at Gandhinagar (Gujarat). With reference to the provisions of Section 152 of the Air Force Act, 1950, it is stated that no finding or sentence of a general, district or summary general court-martial shall be

Sugreev Singh Desuriya Vs. Central Government of India and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 73 and 82; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 15

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1442

or under Section 82 against the appellant-writ petitioner. If it has been proceeded under Section 82 of the Air Force Act, 1950. it cannot be said that the minor punishment awarded to the appellant-writ petitioner is without jurisdiction.17. In view … of 1999 has been filed by the appellant-writ petitioner, Sugreev Singh Desuriya, against the judgment and order dated 24.11.1995 passed by the learned single Judge, whereby, the learned single Judge, dismissed the Misc. Writ Petition No. 3320