Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 19 · Page 1 of about 3,940 results (0.174 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Nov 13 2002

Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Vs. E ...

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Nov-13-2002

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 20(7), 65 and 71; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 18, 18(1), 24, 24(4) and 36; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 45; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(3) and 14(4)

Reported in : 101(2002)DLT267; 2003(1)SLJ171(Delhi)

On April 27, 1995, charges were framed against the respondent. He was charged under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950, for having used criminal force to a woman with the intention to outrage her modesty. The respondent was … held that an officer who behaves in a manner unbecoming his position can be removed from service under Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950, read with Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954 without being tried by

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 05 2009

Praveen Bhatia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Mar-05-2009

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 15; Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Army Rules - Rule 14; Air Force Pension Regulations

Reported in : AIR2009SC2626; 2009(57)BLJR1253; 2009(3)BomCR750; [2009(121)FLR391]; 2009(3)KLJ549; (2009)IIILLJ9SC; 2009(3)SCALE645; (2009)4SCC225; 2009(2)ShimLC102; 2009(3)SLJ82(SC); 2009AIRSCW4045:2009(2)LHSC858

dated 24.6.1992 by which he was compulsorily retired in exercise of powers conferred by Section 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (in short the `Act') and Rule 15 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 (in short the `Rules').3. Averments

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 04 2005

M.M. Malhotra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : Oct-04-2005

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act 1950 - Sections 19, 45 and 191(2); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 45, 46 and 191(5); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 5, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3) and 16; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16 and 16(4); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 1 to 4, 14 and 16(4); Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Hindu Law

Reported in : AIR2006SC80; 2006(1)BomCR661; [2005(107)FLR1006]; JT2005(9)SC506; 2006(1)MhLj1; 2006MPLJ1(SC); 2005(8)SCALE202; (2005)8SCC351; 2006(1)SLJ303(SC)

upon to show-cause as to why he should not be dismissed/removed from service under Section 19 of the Air Force Act; 1950 (in short the 'Act') read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969. The charges leveled in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Dec 21 2000

N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Dec-21-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984

Reported in : 95(2002)DLT770

Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … held and opportunity should have been held and opportunity should have been given to him as required by Section 19 of the said Act read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969. The learned Single Judge

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Mar 04 1992

Sgt. Jeevan Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court : Karnataka

Decided on : Mar-04-1992

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 20, 22, 24, 73 and 189(2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 15(2), 13 to 18; Constitution of India - Article 20(2)

Reported in : ILR1992KAR1027; 1992(2)KarLJ408

Order under Appeals, had refused to interfere with the orders of discharge of Airmen, who were subject to Air Force Act, 1950 (for short, 'the Act'), we were, to begin with, rather disinclined to entertain these appeals being of the … the modes by which the services of a person subject to the Act, could be terminated. Provision in Section 19 of the Act vests in the Central Government the power of termination of the services of any person

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 02 2003

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Flt. Lt. G.S. Bajwa

Court : Supreme Court of India

Decided on : May-02-2003

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 7, 41, 41(2), 65, 111 and 125; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 21, 22 and 33; Army Act; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 88, 89, 100, 102, 110, 111 and 125; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)

Reported in : 104(2003)DLT618(SC); JT2003(4)SC505; 2003(4)SCALE494; (2003)9SCC630; [2003]3SCR1092; 2003(3)SLJ288(SC); 2003(2)LC849(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1479

Air Force discipline. Accordingly the respondent was charged of offences punishable under Sections 41(2) and 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). According to the respondent the proceedings before the General Court Martial were … prejudicial to the good order and Air Force discipline. Accordingly the respondent was charged of offences punishable under Sections 41(2) and 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). According to the … judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi dated August 3, 1995 in Civil Writ Petition No. 245 of 1986 whereby the High Court

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 11 2008

Union of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Sqn. Ldr. R. Sood

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-11-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 37, 121 and 122(1); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(7), 16, 16(2) and 17; Army Act - Sections 19 and 122; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 149, 365 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197(2); Constitution of India - Sections 311(2)

Reported in : 2008(102)DRJ52

the Armed Forces. The respondent was dismissed from service by the Central Government under Section 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 by issuing an order dated 22nd September, 1993.

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jan 27 2000

Ex. Sqn. Ldr. Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Jan-27-2000

Subject : Service

Acts : Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 17

Reported in : 2000IIIAD(Delhi)451; 84(2000)DLT320; 2000(53)DRJ93

However, the Air Headquarters on 12th February, 1983 issued a show cause notice under Section 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 17 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 terming the appellant's application of the year 1989

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 2008

Ex. Wing Commander V. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Delhi

Decided on : Sep-01-2008

Subject : Service

Acts : Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 124; Custom Rules; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 79; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Air Force Regulations, 1961; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 16, 16(2), 16(3), 16(5) and 17; Constitution of India - Article 226

Reported in : 153(2008)DLT210

7/79.6. However, a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner dated 24.4.1990 under Section 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Feb 22 2011

Joy Thomas Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry ...

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi

Decided on : Feb-22-2011

Subject : Right to Information

working as a Commissioned Officer in Air Force. He was removed from service under Section 19 of the Air Force Act 1950 read with Rule 16(7) of the Air Force Rules 1969. He has filed this proceedings challenging the order

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial