Advanced Search Results
Union of India (Uoi) Through Its Secretary, Ministry of Defense, Vs. E ...
Delhi
Nov-13-2002
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 20(3), 20(7), 65 and 71; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 18, 18(1), 24, 24(4) and 36; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 19 and 45; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(3) and 14(4)
101(2002)DLT267; 2003(1)SLJ171(Delhi)
On April 27, 1995, charges were framed against the respondent. He was charged under Section 71 of the Air Force Act, 1950, for having used criminal force to a woman with the intention to outrage her modesty. The respondent was … held that an officer who behaves in a manner unbecoming his position can be removed from service under Section 19 of the Army Act, 1950, read with Rule 14 of the Army Rules, 1954 without being tried by
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskPraveen Bhatia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Mar-05-2009
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 15; Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Army Rules - Rule 14; Air Force Pension Regulations
AIR2009SC2626; 2009(57)BLJR1253; 2009(3)BomCR750; [2009(121)FLR391]; 2009(3)KLJ549; (2009)IIILLJ9SC; 2009(3)SCALE645; (2009)4SCC225; 2009(2)ShimLC102; 2009(3)SLJ82(SC); 2009AIRSCW4045:2009(2)LHSC858
dated 24.6.1992 by which he was compulsorily retired in exercise of powers conferred by Section 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (in short the `Act') and Rule 15 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 (in short the `Rules').3. Averments
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskM.M. Malhotra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Supreme Court of India
Oct-04-2005
Service
Army Act 1950 - Sections 19, 45 and 191(2); Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 45, 46 and 191(5); Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 4, 5, 11, 12, 12(1), 12(2), 12(3) and 16; Marriage Laws (Amendment) Act, 1976; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16 and 16(4); Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 1 to 4, 14 and 16(4); Central Civil Services (Conduct) Rules, 1964 - Rule 3; Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965; Hindu Law
AIR2006SC80; 2006(1)BomCR661; [2005(107)FLR1006]; JT2005(9)SC506; 2006(1)MhLj1; 2006MPLJ1(SC); 2005(8)SCALE202; (2005)8SCC351; 2006(1)SLJ303(SC)
upon to show-cause as to why he should not be dismissed/removed from service under Section 19 of the Air Force Act; 1950 (in short the 'Act') read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969. The charges leveled in
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask18-section briefs on any result in this list
N.R. Ajwani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Dec-21-2000
Service
Army Act, 1950 - Sections 18, 19, 63, 69, 117(3), 154, 160(4) and 165; Army Rules, 1954 - Rules 17, 23, 23(5), 82(3) and 147A; Indian Official Secrets Act, 1923 - Sections 3, 3(1) and 5; Army Pension Regulations, 1961 - Regulations 3 and 22; Constitution of India - Articles 1, 11, 14, 19(1), 19(5), 21, 31(1), 33, 53, 74, 74(1), 77, 154, 163(1), 226, 309, 310, 310(1), 311, 311(2) and 356; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 18 and 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 16; Railway Establishment Code - Rules 148, 148(3), 149 and 149(3); Government of India Act, 1919 - Sections 96B; Constitution of India (Fiftieth Amendment) Act, 1984
95(2002)DLT770
Division Bench of this Court. In that case the President passed the Order under Section 18 of the Air Force Act, 1950 dismissing Hazara Singh from service with immediate effect. The main argument addressed was that as Hazara Singh had … held and opportunity should have been held and opportunity should have been given to him as required by Section 19 of the said Act read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969. The learned Single Judge
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskSgt. Jeevan Kumar Vs. Union of India (Uoi)
Karnataka
Mar-04-1992
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 20, 22, 24, 73 and 189(2); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 15(2), 13 to 18; Constitution of India - Article 20(2)
ILR1992KAR1027; 1992(2)KarLJ408
Order under Appeals, had refused to interfere with the orders of discharge of Airmen, who were subject to Air Force Act, 1950 (for short, 'the Act'), we were, to begin with, rather disinclined to entertain these appeals being of the … the modes by which the services of a person subject to the Act, could be terminated. Provision in Section 19 of the Act vests in the Central Government the power of termination of the services of any person
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Flt. Lt. G.S. Bajwa
Supreme Court of India
May-02-2003
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 2, 7, 41, 41(2), 65, 111 and 125; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 19, 19(1), 19(4), 21, 22 and 33; Army Act; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 88, 89, 100, 102, 110, 111 and 125; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC)
104(2003)DLT618(SC); JT2003(4)SC505; 2003(4)SCALE494; (2003)9SCC630; [2003]3SCR1092; 2003(3)SLJ288(SC); 2003(2)LC849(SC); (2003)2UPLBEC1479
Air Force discipline. Accordingly the respondent was charged of offences punishable under Sections 41(2) and 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). According to the respondent the proceedings before the General Court Martial were … prejudicial to the good order and Air Force discipline. Accordingly the respondent was charged of offences punishable under Sections 41(2) and 65 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'). According to the … judgment and order of the High Court of Delhi dated August 3, 1995 in Civil Writ Petition No. 245 of 1986 whereby the High Court
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskUnion of India (Uoi) and ors. Vs. Ex. Sqn. Ldr. R. Sood
Delhi
Jan-11-2008
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19, 37, 121 and 122(1); Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 14, 14(2), 14(7), 16, 16(2) and 17; Army Act - Sections 19 and 122; Indian Penal Code (IPC) - Sections 147, 149, 365 and 304; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) - Sections 197(2); Constitution of India - Sections 311(2)
2008(102)DRJ52
the Armed Forces. The respondent was dismissed from service by the Central Government under Section 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 by issuing an order dated 22nd September, 1993.
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEx. Sqn. Ldr. Anil Gupta Vs. Union of India and anr.
Delhi
Jan-27-2000
Service
Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rule 17
2000IIIAD(Delhi)451; 84(2000)DLT320; 2000(53)DRJ93
However, the Air Headquarters on 12th February, 1983 issued a show cause notice under Section 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 read with Rule 17 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 terming the appellant's application of the year 1989
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskEx. Wing Commander V. Mehta Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Delhi
Sep-01-2008
Service
Customs Act, 1962 - Sections 124; Custom Rules; Gold (Control) Act, 1968 - Sections 79; Air Force Act, 1950 - Sections 19; Air Force Regulations, 1961; Air Force Rules, 1969 - Rules 16, 16(2), 16(3), 16(5) and 17; Constitution of India - Article 226
153(2008)DLT210
7/79.6. However, a show cause notice was issued to the petitioner dated 24.4.1990 under Section 19 of the Air Force Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as the said Act) read with Rule 16 of the Air Force Rules, 1969 (hereinafter
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskJoy Thomas Vs. Union of India, Represented by the Secretary, Ministry ...
Armed forces Tribunal AFT Regional Bench Kochi
Feb-22-2011
Right to Information
working as a Commissioned Officer in Air Force. He was removed from service under Section 19 of the Air Force Act 1950 read with Rule 16(7) of the Air Force Rules 1969. He has filed this proceedings challenging the order
Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & AskAI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free
- ‹ Prev
- 2
- 3
- 4
- 5
- 6
- 7
- 8
- 9
- 10
- 11
- Next ›
- Last »