Advanced Search Results

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Service

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 32; Air Force Act, 1950 - Section 39(a),161(1),180(1),184; Code of Criminal Procedure (CPC) - Section 428; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

employee of Indian Air Force, who has been found guilty of the offence under Section 39(a) of The Air Force Act, 1950 (for brevity “the Act”) and has been awarded sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months along with … habeas corpus.13. We have been apprised that the petitioner has submitted a representation under Section 180(1) read with Section 184 of the Act. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the said representation, we direct the Competent

Air Cmde Mrigendra Singh, Vsm Vs. Union of India, Represented by the S ...

Court : Guwahati

Subject : Education

records were sought for by respondent No.8 purportedly in exercise of his powers under Section 108 of the Air Force Act, 1950, though he does not, according to the petitioner, have such an authority. The obtaining of the call records … (2010) 13 SCC 255, and Major AR Malhotra Vs Union of India, reported in Mil LJ 2005 JandK 184, were included in the compilation of the respondents, but have not been cited by the respondents at the

Dhirendra Kumar Singh and Others Vs. State of A.P. and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1973 - Sections 4, (2), 5, 428, 437 and 439; Navy Act, 1957 - Sections 2, 3(22), 77, 78, (1), (2), 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 93, (2), (3), 151 and 184; Indian Penal Code (IPC), 1860 - Sections 342 and 392; Arms Act, 1959 - Sections 25(1-B)(A) and 27; Air-Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950 - Sections 176; Navy (Discipline and Miscellaneous provisions) Regulations, 1965 - Regulations 89 and 92(2)

Reported in : 1999(4)ALD452; 1999(2)ALT(Cri)312; 1999CriLJ4421

Thus, it cannot be said that under the provisions of the Navy Act including the regulations made under Section 184 of the Act, there is no provision regarding confinement of a person or release of person pending trial. … Procedure would be applicable in respect of persons proceeded under Court-Martial under the Army Act, Navy Act or Air-Force Act came up for consideration before the Supreme Court in the case of Ajmer Singh v. Union of

Samrendra Beura Vs. U.O.i. and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Education

employee of Indian Air Force, who has been found guilty of the offence under Section 39(a) of The Air Force Act, 1950 (for brevity “the Act”) and has been awarded sentence to suffer rigorous imprisonment for three months along with … habeas corpus.13. We have been apprised that the petitioner has submitted a representation under Section 180(1) read with Section 184 of the Act. Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the said representation, we direct the Competent

Hindustan Lever Limited Vs. Hindustam Lever Employees Union and B.S. B ...

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971; Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A, 3A, 9A, 10A(3A), 18, 19, 25F, 25G, 25O, 36, 36(1) and 38; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Army Act, 1950; Bombay Industrial Disputes Rules, 1957 - Rules 25 and 62; Constitution of India - Article 32; Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules; Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules; Revised Leave Rules; Civil Service Regulations; Civilians in Defence Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules; Indian Railway Establishment Code; Karnataka Industrial Rules - Rule 59

Reported in : (2006)ILLJ1119Bom

has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 962 of … (1973)IILLJ403SC , (ix) Brooke Bond India Limited v. Workmen 1981 III LLJ 184 , (x) Raza Buland Sugar Co. Ltd. v. Their Workmen : (1972)IILLJ35SC … said unfair labour practice. iii) It is further declared that discontinuation of lines in Hard Soaps Department, a Section of Toilet Soaps Departments, Printing Department and the closure of E.P.C. (Machine Building) Department and the Sulphanation Department,

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Etc. Vs. H.K. Khatau and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 10(1); Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 - Sections 1(3), 2, 4 and 7

Reported in : 1983(2)BomCR747; [1984(48)FLR322]; (1984)ILLJ448Bom

hold a civil post under the Central Government or a State Government, or who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957.'The learned counsel urged that the definition of 'employee' under … the single Judge of the Madras High Court in Writ Petn. No. 184 of 1977 Oriental Fire and General Insurance Co. v. A. Shrinivas to … any instrument or contract having effect by virtue of any enactment under the Act. The sweep of this Section clearly provides that the right to claim gratuity by an employee under the provisions of this Act is

L/D Clerk Vinod Kumar Sharma Vs. Union of India and ors

Court : Rajasthan Jodhpur

Subject : Education

to which the said Act of 2007 applies, namely, the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950 to the said Armed Forces Tribunal. Learned counsel for the respondents has also drawn the attention of the … issue involved in the present case does not fall within the definition of 'Service Matters' as defined under Section 3 (o) of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (for short, hereinafter referred to as 'Act of 2007')

The Union Carbide (India) Ltd. Vs. Ramesh Kumbla and Others

Court : Mumbai

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2 and 33; Industrial Disputes Act, 1985 - Sections 2; Maharashtra Recognition of Trade Unions and Prevention of Unfair Labour Practices Act, 1971 - Sections 3(5), 28 and 44; Constitution of India - Article 227; Trade Union Act, 1926; Air Force Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957; Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972

Reported in : 1999(1)ALLMR540; 1999(1)BomCR705; 1999(2)MhLj63

led to that dispute, but does not include any such person - (i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957; or (ii) who is employed in the Police service or as an officer … Palwankar v. Presiding Officer of First Labour Court & others (1992) I.C.L.R. 184, the employee was a Foreman in Job Department of a newspaper Company. … the preliminary issue that the complaint was maintainable since respondent No. 1 was a 'workman', as defined in section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short 'I.D. Act') or an employee as defined in clause

Hamdan Vs. Rumsfeld

Court : US Supreme Court

Subject : MRTP

consisted of “disinterested civilian judges,” and concluding that there was no reason for the Court to address an Air Force Captain’s argument that he was entitled to remain free from confinement pending appeal of his conviction by court-martial … the Articles of War were codified and re-enacted as the UCMJ in 1950, Congress determined to retain Article 15 because it had been “construed by … and mandamus petitions, Hamdan asserted that the military commission lacks authority to try him because (1) neither congressional Act nor the common law of war supports trial by this commission for conspiracy, an offense that, Hamdan says, … habeas corpus filed by … an alien detained … at Guantanamo Bay.” Section 1005(h)(2) provides that §§1005(e)(2) and (3)-which give the D. C. Circuit “exclusive” … War, the commission “as such” was inaugurated in 1847. Id. , at 832; G. Davis, A Treatise

Property Owners Association Vs. State Of Maharashtra .

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

for public purpose, and shall include the following purposes, namely:- (a) for strategic purposes relating to naval, military, air force, and armed forces of the Union, including central paramilitary forces or any work vital to national security or … West Bengal vs. Anwar Ali Sarkar, AIR1952SC75(“Anwar Ali Sarkar”), this Court struck down the West Bengal Special Courts Act, 1950, holding that it violated Article 14 of the Constitution. Vivian Bose J.in a separate judgment stated that provisions … said amendment, Civil Appeal No.1012 of 2002 Etc. Page 5 of 139 Section - 1A was also inserted in that Act and it contains a