Skip to content

Advanced Search Results

Act1: air force act 1950 section 181 · Page 1 of about 175 results (0.081 seconds)

Pulse this search Log in to save a LexPulse alert for this search

AI Studio

AI Brief on every result

Start a 7-day free trial - 18-section briefs and case chat on any judgment in these results, plus Semantic Search on your next query.

Jul 21 1971

Aswini Kumar Banerjee Vs. State and ors.

Court : Kolkata

Decided on : Jul-21-1971

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1972CriLJ1505

Lord Summer in the case of Quebec Railway Light Heat and Power Co Ltd v. Vandry reported in AIR 1920 PC 181 at page 186 thatEffect, must be given if possible to all the words used, for … West Bengal (Prevention of Violent Activities) Act, 1970, it shall be in force for three months only from the date of detention, unless on a … detention. Mr. Dutt next contended that he is conscious of the line of decisions under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, referred to by Mr. Acharya but the said decisions have tried to read more into the provisions of … N.C. Talukdar, J.1. This Rule was issued on an application under Section 491 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, praying for a writ and/or

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Aug 11 2000

Union of India and Another Vs. Mohammed MohiuddIn and Others

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Aug-11-2000

Subject : Property

Acts : Cantonments Act, 1924 - Sections 3(1 and 2), 108, 178, 181, 274, 280, 282 and 283; Constitution of India - Articles 14, 226, 295(2) and 300-A; Urban Land (Ceiling and Regulation) Act, 1976 - Sections 6(1) and 15(2); Cantonment Land Administration (Amendment) Rules, 1937; Eviction of Unauthorised Occupants Act, 1971; Hyderabad Land Revenue Act, 1337 Fasli; Evidence Act, 1872 - Sections 65 and 90; Municipalities Act - Sections 330; Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1925 - Rules 1(A), 2, 3 and 6; Secunderabad and Aurangabad Cantonment Land Administration Rules, 1930; Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317-F; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1973 - Sections 11; Hyderabad Municipal Corporation Act - Sections 428, 433 and 450

Reported in : 2000(6)ALD376; 2000(6)ALT551

the petitioners shows that they are prima facie in possession has no force in the eye of law. The learned single Judge committed a mistake … right over the said property as held by this Court in Jaya Rao v. Cantonment Board Secunderabad, : AIR1961AP113 . The finding of the learned single Judge that earlier there was a direction of this Court to … learned single Judge took into consideration the contention of the respondents that no permission can be granted under Section 181(a) of the Cantonments Act and the Government may refuse sanction if the right of the builder on the

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 01 1997

Seth Srenikbhai Kasturbhai and ors. Etc. Vs. Seth Chandulal Kasturchan ...

Court : Patna

Decided on : Jul-01-1997

Subject : Civil

Acts : Trusts Act, 1882 - Sections 48; Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) , 1908 - Sections 11, 105 and 115 - Order 1, Rules 8 and 9 - Order 3, Rule 1 - Order 6, Rules 15 and 17 - Order 7, Rule 11 - Order 27, Rule 1; Specific Relief Act, 1963 - Sections 34; Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 - Sections 2 and 3(1); Constitution of India - Articles 14, 25, 26, 27, 31A and 226; Validation Act, 1969; Places of Worship (Special Provisions) Act, 1991 - Sections 3; Contract Act, 1872 - Sections 20, 22 and 23; Bihar Land Reforms (Amendment) Act, 1954 - Sections 4, 13 and 14(3); Forest Act - Sections 29

is found from the records but after Zamindari Abolition Act coming into force of the Bihar Land Reforms Act, 1950 there was a notification on 2-5-1953 by the Governor of Bihar Vide Notification No. 955/LR/ZAN/ under Section 3(1) … of Kerala High Court was also referred to being AIR 1972 Kerala 181 (George v. State), wherein also it was held that a class of … before the Privy Council by both the parties and the judgment of the Privy Council is reported in AIR 1926 PC 13. As regards 20 tonks and shrines of Gautam Swami, it was held by the Privy

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

18-section briefs on any result in this list

Oct 15 1951

Jagjiwanrao Dayabhai and ors. Vs. the State

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-15-1951

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1952CriLJ646

Tribunals Regulation, was considered and declared invalid by a Full Bench in Abdur Rahim v. Joseph A. Pinto AIR 1951 Hyd 11. Naik, C.J. stated:The portions which offend the Constitution are the whole of Sub-section (2) of … the Code and of any other law for the time being in force in so far as they may be applicable and in so far … January 1951, in exercise of the powers conferred by Section 12 of the Madhya Pradesh Public Security Measures Act, 1950, hereafter referred to as the Act, constituted a Special Court of criminal jurisdiction for the Akola District. By … Court of criminal jurisdiction for the Akola District. By another notification No. 181-121-XVII-B, issued on the 19th January 1951, the State Government in exercise of

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Sep 01 1977

K. Venkaiah and ors. Vs. K. Venkateswara Rao and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Decided on : Sep-01-1977

Subject : Limitation

Acts : Andhra Pradesh (Telengana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950 - Sections 89 (2) and 93; ;Limitation Act, 1963 - Sections 5 and 12 to 24; Andhra Pradesh Tenancy Act; Hyderabad Tenancy Act - Sections 93

Reported in : AIR1978AP166

S. 5 of the Limitation Act to proceedings under the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1950. Before the coming into force of the Indian Limitation Act, 1963, this court held uniformly that S. 5 … Disputes Act. Article 137 of the new Limitation Act, corresponds to Article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908. They are in the nature of residuary … Rao, J, came to the said conclusion on the basis of the observation in Sivakumar v. Sivaiah, : AIR1966AP14 , to the effect that it is well settled by a series of decisions of this Court that … such express exclusion in the Hyderabad Tenancy Act, the Bench held that Section 5 does apply to proceedings under the said Act. When the said

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Oct 03 1958

Sushila Mahendra Nanavati Vs. Mahendra Manital Nanavati

Court : Mumbai

Decided on : Oct-03-1958

Subject : Family

Acts : Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 - Sections 12(1), 12(2) and 23; ;Code of Civil Procedure (CPC), 1908 - Order 8, Rule 5; ;Evidence Act - Sections 58

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR431

- Order 8, Rule 5; Indian Evidence Act - Section 58Cases Referred: Motabhoy Mulla Essabhoy v. Mulji Haridas, AIR 1915 PC 2, 42 Ind App 103; John Over v. Muriel A.I. Over, AIR 1925 Bom 231, 27 … jurisdiction to entertain the suit. The Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, came into force on 18-5-1955 and the petitioner filed the present petition on 18-4-1956 for … amended by S. 4 of the matrimonial Causes Act, 1937, (now S. 4 (1) of the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1950). In a later English case (1954) 1 All ER 536 Hodson L. J. who delivered the Judgment of … a 'quasi-criminal offence,' s for instance in (1948) P. 179 at P. 181. It was conceded that this description was condemned in later English cases,

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 26 2006

Siel Limited Vs. the Punjab State Electricity

Court : Appellate Tribunal for Electricity APTEL

Decided on : May-26-2006

Subject : MRTP

Reported in : (2006)LCAPTEL931

the following observation at page 770 (of SCR): at p. 465 of AIR): The conjoint effect of Sections 14(3)(b), 34 and 45(2)(c) is that the … 2003, the Electricity Act, 2003 (for short Act of 2003), came into force. By virtue of the first proviso to Section 82 of the Act … State Road Transport Corporation v. Gopinath Gundachar Char which was a case arising under the Road Transport Corporation Act, 1950. Under Section 14 of that Act a Road Transport Corporation was entitled to appoint officers and servants as … Regulations consistent with the Act and the Rules generally to carry out the provisions of this Act. Likewise, Section 181(1) of the Act of 2003 provides that the State Commissions may make Regulations. It is not only in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Jul 10 1958

Sudhindra Kumar Deb and ors. Vs. the State of Assam and ors.

Court : Guwahati

Decided on : Jul-10-1958

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 10 and 33; General Clauses Act, 1897 - Sections 21

Sub-section (1) of the section. The decision of the Supreme Court in S.S. Shetty v. Bharat Nidhi Ltd. AIR 1958 SC 12 (A) to which the respondent referred in this context was a case falling under Sub-section … was legally justified in revoking the said reference. It was also contended that the Industrial Disputes Appellate Tribunal Act 1950 was repealed by the provisions of the Industrial Disputes Amending Act on 28-8-1956; but Section 33(c) came into … In Rivers Steam Navigation Co., Ltd. v. Radhanath Hazarika. Civil Rule No. 181 of 1956, D/-18-7-1957 (E) which is a Division Bench judgment of this … and other benelits that accrued to him during the period of his forced unemployment. The Company will calculate the amount and pay to Deb within

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

May 04 2012

Mrs. Vanmala Manoharrao Kamdi and Others Vs. the Deputy Charity Commis ...

Court : Mumbai Nagpur

Decided on : May-04-2012

Subject : Education

Sangh..Versus.. Arun Nathuram Gaikwad and others). (20) 2007 (2) Supreme Court Cases 181 (Rajesh Kumar and others..Versus.. D.C.I.T. and others). (21) AIR 2008 Supreme Court … (11) 2011(1) Bom.C.R. 486 (Sambhaji Raje Sadashiv Dahatonde and another ..Versus. State of Maharashtra and others). (12) 2011(1) AIR Bom. R. 750 (Nagpur Bench) (Murlidhar Janrao Kale and others..Versus.. State of Maharashtra and others). (13) AIR (87) … When the rights of the parties are adjudicated, there is a binding force to such orders they cannot be termed as administrative orders nor Section … for the appellant in Letters Patent Appeal No.368/2011 made the following submissions : (i) The Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 was enacted to regulate and make better provisions for the administration of public religious and charitable Trusts in

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

Dec 31 1956

State Vs. Gangadhar

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Decided on : Dec-31-1956

Subject : CriminalConstitution

Acts : Madhya Bharat Maintenance of Public Order Act, 1949 - Sections 7, 7(1) and 11; Code of Criminal Procedure (CrPC) , 1898 - Sections 144; Constitution of India - Article 19 and 19(1)

Reported in : AIR1957MP54

Dattatraya v. State of Bombay, AIR 1952 SC 181 (C) and P. Joseph John v. State of … was placed upon the decision of Calcutta High Court reported in Khagendro Nath De v. District Magistrate Dinajpur, AIR 1951 Cal 3 (A) and State v. Motilal, 1953 Madh-B LJ 607: (AIR 1952 Madh-B 114) (B). It … Magistrate Gird Gwalior. 5. While this order was said to be in force on 22-10-1952 at 3 P. M., a profession was take out with … In Dattatray's case (C) the person who signed the confirmation order of the detenu under the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 was Assistant Secretary to the Government of Bombay and expressed the order as for the Secretary to the … Nevaskar, J. 1. Accused Gangadhar Sakharam Dandawate and 20 others prosecuted under Section 7 (2) of the Madhya Bharat Maintenance of Public Order Act (7

Tag this Judgment! AI Brief & Ask

AI Brief (18 sections) + Semantic Search - 7 days free

  • ‹ Prev
  • Last »

AI Briefs · Semantic Search · Save & annotate judgments

Start your 7-day free trial