Advanced Search Results

Parkash Chandra Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Acts : Constitution of India - Articles 22, 22(5), 77(2), 166, 166(1) and 226; Preventive Detention Act, 1950 - Sections 3, 3(1), 3(2), 3(3) and 3(4), 7 and 10; General Clauses Act - Sections 3(8)

Reported in : AIR1965P& H270

been charged for purposes of detention he could have been placed for trial before a court-martial under the AIR Force Act, 1950 or he could nave been tried under the Official Secrets Act 1923. It is pointed out that he … has become locus classics on the subject. It was observed at p. 178 (of scr): (at p. 161 of air):'The first part of Article 22 … on 29th Novemeber, 1963 (vide order Annexure 'A').(3) On 4th Decemeber, 1963 the following order was made under Section 3(1)(a)(I) of the Act which must be reproduced in its entirety (Annexure 'B')'GOVERNMENT OF INIDA MINISTRY OF HOME

Parkash Chandra Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Criminal

Reported in : 1965CriLJ119

been charged for purposes of detention, he could have been placed for trial before a court-martial under the Air Force Act, 1950 or he could have been tried under the Official Secrets Act, 1923. It is pointed out that he … habeas corpus for the production of the body of Parkash Chandra, who is at present being detained under Section 3(1)(a)(i) of the Preventive Detection Act, 1950 (hereinafter called the Act) in the Central jail at Tehar, and … has become locus classicus on the subject. It was observed at p. 178 (of SCK) : (at p. 161 of AIR):The first part of Article

Devi Saran Mishra Vs. the Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Subject : Criminal

would apply to the persons who are subject to the Army Act, 1950, Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950. It will also apply to the retired Army personnel, including their dependents, heirs and successors in so for … 1980 (3) SCC 625) : (at p. 1820 of AIR 1980 SC 178), and is not regarded as the definitive test in this field of … that this Court should take note of the change in the legal provision as has been introduced under Section 34 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007, and the present writ petition should be transferred to the

Gwalior Rayon Silk Manufacturing (Weaving) Co. Ltd. Vs. the Union of I ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Subject : Direct TaxationConstitution

Acts : Constitution of India - Article 295(1); Madhya Bharat Regulation of Government Act, 1948 - Sections 3 and 4; Income Tax Act - Sections 13; Finance Act, 1950

Reported in : AIR1960MP330; [1961]43ITR184(MP)

Supreme Court in paragraph 9 of the judgment in Dalmia Dadri Cement Co., Ltd. v. Commr. of Income-tax, AIR 1958 SC 818.He sought to derive support for his contention that though Article 295(1)(b) did not limit the … position was altered by the Indian Independence Act, 1947, which came into force on 15-8-1947. With the coming into force of this Act, the British … The Indian Income-tax Act was made applicable to Part B States, including Madhya Bharat. on 1-4-1950. The Finance Act, 1950, amended the Income-tax Act by inter alia introducing in the Act the definition of the term 'Taxable Territories'.The … (10th edn.), there is a statement at p. 178 that the law laid down in (1790) 100 … from February 1954 in respect of the income of the Staple Fibre Section of the petitioner-Company.2. The events leading to the supplicant's claim for exemption

H. Rama Murthy Vs. K.R.D. Technologies Limited and anr.

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Subject : Labour and Industrial

Acts : Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 - Sections 2, 2A(2) and 33C(2); Air Force Act, 1950; Army Act, 1950; Navy Act, 1957

Reported in : 2009(1)ALT658

retrenchment has led to that dispute, but does not include any such person:(i) who is subject to the Air Force Act, 1950 (45 of 1950), or the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950), or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of … 27.07.2001. The order of dismissal is the subject matter of I.D. No. 178 of 2005 before the Labour Court-I, Hyderabad.2. The petitioner filed Miscellaneous Petition … the Labour Court-I, Hyderabad.2. The petitioner filed Miscellaneous Petition No. 10 of 2002 before the Labour Court, under Section 33-C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short 'the Act'), claiming certain monetary and financial benefits. They

The Chief Conservator Officer Forest Department Haryana and Others Vs. ...

Court : Punjab and Haryana

Subject : Labour and Industrial

led to that dispute. The last segment of the definition specifies certain exclusions. A person to whom the Air Force Act, 1950, or the Army Act, 1950, or the Navy Act, 1957, is applicable or who is employed in the … made to Annexure D-1 to show that the workman worked only for 178 days and, therefore, he had not completed 240 days. The Labour Court, … basis and the definition of the term retrenchment was quite comprehensive. The Apex Court has further held that Section 2(s) contains an exhaustive definition of the term 'workman' and the source of employment and the method of

Ramesh Birch and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Constitution

Acts : Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 - Sections 87 and 89; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction (Amendment) Act, 1985; East Punjab Urban Rent Restriction Act, 1949 - Sections 2; Constitution of India - Articles 143(1), 246(4) and 248; East Punjab Rent Restriction (Chandigarh Amendment) Act, 1982

Reported in : AIR1990SC560; JT1989(2)SC483; 1989Supp(1)SCC430; [1989]2SCR629

1985) (hereinafter referred to as 'the 1985 Act), as it was in force in the State of Punjab at the date of the notification and … also necessary here to contrast the above two provisions with Section 2 of the Part C States (Laws) Act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to, for purposes of convenience, as Act III). That provision reads as follows:Section 2 of Act … this Court. The judgments in R. v. Burah (1878) 5 I A 178. Jatindra Nath Gupta, , the Delhi Laws Act case, : [1951]2SCR747 , … Singh, : [1957]1SCR605 , Banarsi Das : [1959]1SCR427 , Edward Mills : (1954)IILLJ686SC , Western India Theatres, : AIR1959SC586 , Hamdard Dawakhana : 1960CriLJ671 , Vasantlal Maghanbhai : 1978CriLJ1281 , Jyoti Prashad : [1962]2SCR125 , Shama Rao

3398223 M Sep Jagjit Singh Versus Union of India and Others

Court : Armed forces Tribunal AFT Principal Bench New Delhi

Subject : Land Acquisition

of service in respect of persons subject to the Army Act, 1950, the Navy Act, 1957 and the Air Force Act, 1950 and also to provide for appeals arising out of orders, findings or sentences of courts-martial held under the … deemed to be a criminal court for the purposes of sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 193, 195, 196 or 228 of the Indian Penal Code … (SCM)/District Court Martial (DCM) pertained to the area which falls within the jurisdiction of different Benches established under Section 4 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (which is hereinafter referred as “The Act”). It is also

Union of India and Ors. Vs. Major General Shri Kant Sharma and Anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Subject : Land Acquisition

of the Army Act, 1950 (46 of 1950) or the Navy Act, 1957 (62 of 1957) or the Air Force Act, 1950, (45 of 1950) as the case may be; or if sentence is found to be excessive, illegal or … deemed to be a criminal court for the purposes of sections 175, 178, 179, 180, 193, 195, 196 or 228 (45 of 1860) of the … JUDGMENT SUDHANSU JYOTI MUKHOPADHAYA, J In these appeals the question raised is whether the right of appeal under Section 30 of the Armed Forces Tribunal Act, 2007 (hereinafter referred to as the 'ct'), against an order of

Adelaide Mande Tobias Vs. William Albert Tobias

Court : Kolkata

Subject : FamilyCivil

Acts : Divorce Act, 1869 - Sections 3(9), 10, 22 and 23

Reported in : AIR1968Cal133,71CWN605

read with the last clause of Section 10 thereof. While appreciating the force of her submission it is difficult for this Court to accent it … no application to the continuing matrimonial offence of desertion as defined in Section 1(1)(b) of the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1950. Desertion as a ground for divorce was not a part of the traditional law of England appearing in … 10 of the Indian Divorce Act by the Madras Full Bench in Siluvaimani Ammal v. Thangiah Nadar : AIR1956Mad421 . Incidentally, this Madras Full Bench decided that on the mere evidence that the husband was keeping a … was made to the Supreme Court of Judicature (Consolidation) Act 1925, Section 178(2), as substituted by the Matrimonial Causes Act, 1937, Section 4, which simply